Biden: No Guns for Weed Smokers
- Thread starter Three Berries
- Start date
Don't feed it to a buffoon 
GasD
Member
You're speaking the truth here. I work with guys that shoot 6-8 deer a season with zero respect for them. All sitting on their ass in a stand or a blind. They only want to become "more consistent killers with a bow" as they've put it. They don't even process the animal.
the bow i've been using the last couple of years is old, built by a man who's been deceased a spell. the brand name is LoneTree. Mr. Ralph Castoe, the builder, passed from cancer several years ago. i heard that he and a brother both built bows, but split.
Not sure if this has been brought up elsewhere but it's a slippery slope.
www.kcra.com
Extenuating circumstances but the precedent seems to be set.
Mother of 6-year-old boy who shot teacher gets 21 months for marijuana use while owning a gun
The mother of a 6-year-old boy who shot his teacher in a Virginia classroom has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for using marijuana while owning a gun.
www.kcra.com
Extenuating circumstances but the precedent seems to be set.
Crazy Chester
Well-known member
It's just control freak Biden saying "no guns for anyone" - most gun owners use cannabis.
No guns for weed SMOKERS, so just use edibles instead. 
I saw that too. The 6 year old climbed up the dresser and took the gun from her purse; who expects their 6 year old kid to do that kind of thing? The school district knew there was a problem and did nothing. The mother apparently has mental health issues; the kid obviously too. People like that need help. The media and government need a scapegoat so they used a terrible law to send her to prison.
Ironically in the context of this thread, it's the same law they used to prosecute Hunter Biden. Filmed himself using coke and owned a gun. It doesn't matter what drug you use, if you own legally own a gun they can prosecute you. But they usually only prosecute you if you get busted for something else, or if the federal government has a grudge against you. Those kinds of laws are very very bad.
I mentioned this earlier in this thread but this isn't a new law created by the Biden administration. Obama's justice department created it; Trump's extended it and so did Biden's. Because it's a 'tool' they can use to attack enemies of the state.
Any responsible parent would consider that a possibility
Sure. But if 6 year old kids regularly snuck into their parents' rooms at night while they're sleeping and stole their guns to shoot their teachers. There wouldn't be any teachers left in this country. I knew where my dad's gun was when I was a kid. If I'd stolen it I knew I'd never sit down again. He smoked ganja too.
The woman kept the gun in her purse. Out of reach of the child; apparently it had to built a makeshift ladder to get to it. The only other place she could have kept it was in a safe under lock and key. But then there's no way should could have accessed it quickly if an intruder broke into the apartment to attack her and her child.
How many other women who live in dangerous cities do the same thing? Or men who keep guns under their pillow. Or in a dresser. If you think this is a crime, and there should be a law. That guns should be kept under lock and key 24/7 and only removed for sport. Or handguns should be banned, that's okay. That's your position but don't pretend like this woman is different from all those other people and a criminal. Because there's no point in owning a handgun for self-defense if you can get to it quickly.
That's not what we're discussing here, the main issue is that she's going to prison for using cannabis. If you support the law, and you think the woman should go to jail, that's your position. That's okay. But I don't know what you're doing here..
How many other women who live in dangerous cities do the same thing? Or men who keep guns under their pillow. Or in a dresser. If you think this is a crime, and there should be a law. That guns should be kept under lock and key 24/7 and only removed for sport. Or handguns should be banned, that's okay. That's your position but don't pretend like this woman is different from all those other people and a criminal. Because there's no point in owning a handgun for self-defense if you can get to it quickly.
That's not what we're discussing here, the main issue is that she's going to prison for using cannabis. If you support the law, and you think the woman should go to jail, that's your position. That's okay. But I don't know what you're doing here..
Now that I think it over. My grandma kept a 22 revolver my uncle gave her for protection. In an unlocked cabinet shelf 8 feet off the ground in her bedroom. When I was 5,6,7. In case some rapist nut broke into her room at night. I guarantee in her wildest paranoid grandma imagination she the thought never crossed her mind that I'd sneak in, build a makeshift ladder. Steal the gun and shoot my 1st grade teacher.
Actually she showed me where it was, told me it wasn't a toy and not to use it unless bears or rapists attacked and she was incapacitated. My grandpa taught me to how to shoot it. Luckily they weren't addicted to marijuana or it would have been prison for them!
Actually she showed me where it was, told me it wasn't a toy and not to use it unless bears or rapists attacked and she was incapacitated. My grandpa taught me to how to shoot it. Luckily they weren't addicted to marijuana or it would have been prison for them!
my parents showed me where mom's .38 was, how to load/unload it, and took me shooting with it from about 9 or 10 years of age. by then i had my own shotguns etc.
this! ^^^ a handgun with a trigger lock is no more or less than an odd looking hammer. a ball bat, actual hammer or a hatchet would be more valuable for defense,
Heck I was leaving my 12 ga. single shot shotgun on the bus when I went to school by the time I was 12 years old and kept the ammo in my desk. I'd walk through the woods to the bus stop with it and grab it for the walk home at the end of the school day.
My uncle was a instructor who worked for Smith and Wesson when I was a little kid and had us shooting all sorts of revolvers when we were 6-8 years old.
None of the guns in any of our homes were locked up. We kids just knew not to do stupid shit with them.
My uncle was a instructor who worked for Smith and Wesson when I was a little kid and had us shooting all sorts of revolvers when we were 6-8 years old.
None of the guns in any of our homes were locked up. We kids just knew not to do stupid shit with them.
Brother Nature
Well-known member
In the case of a bear attack I certainly hope you were a proficient shot with that 22
RobFromTX
Well-known member
In the case of a bear attack I certainly hope you were a proficient shot with that 22
Lol like a one in a million shot
a bear vs a .22? he'd be better off shooting her to put her out of her misery. shoot the bear, and then you have a REAL problem...In the case of a bear attack I certainly hope you were a proficient shot with that 22
Medical Marijuana Growers And Caregivers Can Own Guns, But Patients Can’t, FBI Says In Little-Noticed Memo
Being a state-registered medical marijuana caregiver or grower doesn’t automatically disqualify a person from owning a firearm, the FBI says. But merely possessing a medical cannabis card as a patient does render a person ineligible. Amid the growing tension between federal gun policies and the...
www.marijuanamoment.net
Politics
Medical Marijuana Growers And Caregivers Can Own Guns, But Patients Can’t, FBI Says In Little-Noticed Memo
Published
1 day ago
on
December 8, 2023
By
Kyle Jaeger
Being a state-registered medical marijuana caregiver or grower doesn’t automatically disqualify a person from owning a firearm, the FBI says. But merely possessing a medical cannabis card as a patient does render a person ineligible.
Amid the growing tension between federal gun policies and the ever-expanding state marijuana legalization movement, a little-noticed FBI memo from 2019 offers a lens into the byzantine legal interpretations surrounding cannabis and firearms—an issue that’s recently been raised in multiple federal court cases.
The government has several different ways it assesses firearm eligibility in the context of cannabis, according to the memo from FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, which was briefly noted in a report from The New York Times last week. In some cases, that involves affirmatively restricting gun rights based on activities or documentation that doesn’t necessarily mean a person is an active marijuana consumer.
At their core, the federal rules say that being an “unlawful user” of a controlled substance, including marijuana, means a person cannot buy or possess a gun. Would-be gun purchasers are required to disclose such use as part of a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) form before making a purchase, and lying on that form is a felony offense.
The statute behind that prohibition has been challenged in a number of federal courts over the past couple of years, with more than one judicial body determining that the restriction is unconstitutional. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has steadfastly defended the ban, however, contending that medical marijuana patients and everyday consumers pose unique dangers to society that justify withholding Second Amendment rights.
I remember when they used to...
