What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Wuhan Coronavirus is an Offensive Biological Warfare Weapon

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
I got half way through and they didn’t say anything.

i'm not surprised that they didn't say anything, lol...anyone see where youtube banned any and all sites pushing misinformation about vaccinations? they'll still let you spew, rave, and panic over rumors about those being developed & tested, but nothing about the ones approved & in use already.
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
I don't disagree with the idea that the virus originated from the lab but it is unfortunate the film included such commentary as it did from Trump and his yes-boy. Many people have said? {paraphrased} A president can say things others cannot?
At that point, the production lost all credibility for me and I shut it off.

You seem to not realize the message. Pompeo was referring to HIGHLY CLASSIFIED information and the fact that the President can LEGALLY say things publicly (that underlings can not).
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
i'm not surprised that they didn't say anything, lol...anyone see where youtube banned any and all sites pushing misinformation about vaccinations? they'll still let you spew, rave, and panic over rumors about those being developed & tested, but nothing about the ones approved & in use already.

It reminded me of clickbait. It was designed to keep you watching but there’s no substance.
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
You seem to not realize the message. Pompeo was referring to HIGHLY CLASSIFIED information and the fact that the President can LEGALLY say things publicly (that underlings can not).

and YOU seem to not realize what is in my head. I was referencing the fact that the foundational information to support the thrust of the production appeared to being built on those ridiculous statements by Trump. This was followed by the producer's insertion by the statement by Pompeo, thereby setting up the puny brains.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
and YOU seem to not realize what is in my head. I was referencing the fact that the foundational information to support the thrust of the production appeared to being built on those ridiculous statements by Trump. This was followed by the producer's insertion by the statement by Pompeo, thereby setting up the puny brains.

what? you obviously stopped watching quite early. but yes it has been dumbed down a bit. but the important points about this story are shown.
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
what? you obviously stopped watching quite early. but yes it has been dumbed down a bit. but the important points about this story are shown.

Yes. 22 minutes. I could not bear to keep watching when they presented this innuendo. If Trump had presented a factual statement (at that point) I would have clung on.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
Yes. 22 minutes. I could not bear to keep watching when they presented this innuendo. If Trump had presented a factual statement (at that point) I would have clung on.

i do understand, but to be honest its exactly one of the problems. just because trump says something doesn't make it false automatically. even a blind chicken will find a corn once in a while. by using that as your method of analysis you might be missing something. its important to make your own decision, just doing the opposite of someone you don't like isn't really very logical way to think about a subject.
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
i do understand, but to be honest its exactly one of the problems. just because trump says something doesn't make it false automatically. even a blind chicken will find a corn once in a while. by using that as your method of analysis you might be missing something. its important to make your own decision, just doing the opposite of someone you don't like isn't really very logical way to think about a subject.

You completely misunderstand. It is not Trump. It is what he said.
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
I don't disagree with the idea that the virus originated from the lab but it is unfortunate the film included such commentary as it did from Trump and his yes-boy. Many people have said? {paraphrased} A president can say things others cannot?
At that point, the production lost all credibility for me and I shut it off.
I found it entertaining much thanks to Trump. The others were interesting to listen to and all but not funny like him.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
You completely misunderstand. It is not Trump. It is what he said.

hm...i don't want to argue senselessly, but can you elaborate? he (trump) doesn't say much, basically he thinks the evidence shows its from the wuhan lab and that he thinks its an accident not on purpose. so whats wrong with that? didnt you say you agreed it was a distinct possibility?
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Yes. 22 minutes. I could not bear to keep watching when they presented this innuendo. If Trump had presented a factual statement (at that point) I would have clung on.

I didn’t watch that long, but I didn’t hear any false/true statements. It was all about what could be. It was designed to draw you in. Did it ever get to any actual information?
 
Top