What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Vote YES or NO on Prop 19

Vote YES or NO on Prop 19


  • Total voters
    1,103
Status
Not open for further replies.

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
anything so divisive cannot be good for our community

Community? All of these people lurking behind anonymous keyboards, afraid to exchange contact information? Can't let anyone other than your oldest and dearest friends or loved ones know about your hobby? Yes, I can clearly see why this "community" should be perpetuated over being made legal with all of the attendant ramifications.
 

Greyskull

Twice as clear as heaven and twice as loud as reas
ICMag Donor
Veteran
If the proposal succeeds, the governor will really have no direct and specific input.

i dont think you understand what i am saying/asking...

my question is about making changes (amendments) to the bill if it passes... and the role of the governor in regards to getting changes applied - like 'can the governor veto proposed amendments to prop 19?'

my question has nothing to do with the passing of the bill itself.
:thank you:
 

NUG-JUG

Member
haven't read 90% of this thread but, i guess california is letting kim-jong il have a grow in oakland off the highway??
 

hydroman65

New member
ROCK THE VOTE CALIFORNIA YES ON 19

ROCK THE VOTE CALIFORNIA YES ON 19

GET OUT AND MAKE IT HAPPEN SHOW THE REST OF THE COUNTRY THE WAY!!!:jump:
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
Sorry to put you in there dag.

I do remember fulfilling my obligation as an enemy within checking the box on the ballot that said "Screw dag over" on the last election day.

My bad. :jerkit:

I can't believe after experiencing the treatment of the system you will still refer to other growers as prohibitionists.

You are shameful. You are illogical. You are hypocritical.

are being a pot grower and a prohibitionist somehow mutually exclusive?

im pretty sure there were plenty of prohibition supporting moonshiners as well..

if you mark your ballot against 19 your vote is a vote for continued prohibition..

what is shameful or illogical about that?

is it somehow "hypocritical" to say someone who would vote to continue the current prohibition is a prohibitionist?

do you prefer economic objector?

what title will alleviate the guilt that makes one protest the correct title so much?

you have done so much to argue against this proposition you admittedly don't even know what it is (according to your own vote in the poll) how would you like to be referred to?

disinformation specialist?
fearmonger extrordinaire?
how about....
purveyor of mythical 2012 free for all props?

what is more comfortable for you than the proper title of prohibitionist

pro·hi·bi·tion·ist noun \-sh(ə-)nist\
: one who favors prohibition; especially capitalized : a member of a United States political party advocating prohibition

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prohibitionist?show=0&t=1288673095
 
Last edited:
Don't count your chickens before they hatch. Nobody knows what will happend until the results are in...they poll less than 1500 people at their choosing in a state of 34 million people. That not even a 1/8th of a percent of voters...
Yeah and most the people polled are republican Peace.
 

Hash Zeppelin

Ski Bum Rodeo Clown
Premium user
ICMag Donor
Veteran
i dont think you understand what i am saying/asking...

my question is about making changes (amendments) to the bill if it passes... and the role of the governor in regards to getting changes applied - like 'can the governor veto proposed amendments to prop 19?'

my question has nothing to do with the passing of the bill itself.
:thank you:

It is like 215. the people vote on amending it, like they did with prop 420.
 

Hash Zeppelin

Ski Bum Rodeo Clown
Premium user
ICMag Donor
Veteran
are being a pot grower and a prohibitionist somehow mutually exclusive?

im pretty sure there were plenty of prohibition supporting moonshiners as well..

if you mark your ballot against 19 your vote is a vote for continued prohibition..

what is shameful or illogical about that?

is it somehow "hypocritical" to say someone who would vote to continue the current prohibition is a prohibitionist?

do you prefer economic objector?

what title will alleviate the guilt that makes one protest the correct title so much?

you have done so much to argue against this proposition you admittedly don't even know what it is (according to your own vote in the poll) how would you like to be referred to?

disinformation specialist?
fearmonger extrordinaire?
how about....
purveyor of mythical 2012 free for all props?

what is more comfortable for you than the proper title of prohibitionist



http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prohibitionist?show=0&t=1288673095

dude your argument is done. you are pulling at the strings of desperation here. what you just said above has got to be the most asinine statement I have ever seen arguing against this bill.

I mean, God damn you are dumb. You might as well just go away, you are wasting bandwidth

I would not call you an economic objector. I would called you a small minded fool
 

Greyskull

Twice as clear as heaven and twice as loud as reas
ICMag Donor
Veteran
wasnt 420 a senate thing/bill... hence SB420?
i dont remember getting to vote on that one....
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Dag... I ignored you for a time. I expected something different from the same BS I saw before. I am that stupid. I'll hand you that.

I'll say this before I do it again with finality:

The shameful hypocritical part has already been addressed.

You may call me a grower.

:thank you:
 

Big D

icmagic
Veteran
The debate is over!

The debate is over!

Come on Cali!!!!!!!!!!!

VOTE YES ON 19!

I know that everyone wants to change the world.... here's YOUR chance! Don't blow it!
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
dude your argument is done. you are pulling at the strings of desperation here. what you just said above has got to be the most asinine statement I have ever seen arguing against this bill.

I mean, God damn you are dumb. You might as well just go away, you are wasting bandwidth

I would not call you an economic objector. I would called you a small minded fool

umm im in the pro category...

i was responding to mr mustards assertion that by supporting prohibition he is not a prohibition...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top