Dunno about LA. I'm talking about towns in the mountains in Colorado
Why would you be talking about Colorado when you responded to my posts regarding California laws specifically? You're not making any sense. Did you read my original post? I'm not talking about Colorado, guy.
Maybe, I should've clarified that I was talking about California, but it seemed obvious to me. When I say, "the number of dispensaries decreased because of laws" it's pretty obvious I'm not talking about Colorado, where restrictions on the number of grow licenses issued were recently lifted. The point of our little discussion was whether, or not California will adopt Colorado's laws. Not what the market trends of Colorado are in comparison to California.
The laws in your state are designed to control the population and for that reason your state's laws likely won't be adopted by larger states who don't have a need to limit the population.
...and Colorado in general. Folks here have seen dispensaries pop up and disappear in large numbers...and I don't know anyone at this point in time who was a skilled grower who is >still< doing the licensing/retail thing. Most got burned/burned out/taken advantage of when the medical thing was exploding in the first green rush in 2009.
I highly doubt the market trends of a state with 5 million people are comparable to a state with 38 million people. Colorado isn't in any a way a reflection of what will happen in states with larger populations. It truly is a tiny little "experiment." To be honest, it's probably the worst state to conduct such an experiment given the limited size of land to populate. I don't blame Colorado, of course. The Federal Government is liable for all the problems this will cause for Colorado by not legalizing it on a national level when 33 out 50 states have approved some form of legalization. Right now Federal Law is being dictated by 17 fucking states in a system where the majority is supposed to be represented when political decisions are made. The "experiment" is over.
I know dozens of people who have absolutely no interest in taking the time to grow weed. They would rather buy the finished product in a retail environment. These are people who have grown weed, too. The vast majority of weed smokers in the world are that way. They don't want to work 50 hours a week, have kids to take care of, bills, wife, etc. and then after all that water plants. Any bit of work is undesirable for the average Joe. Even if that work is merely watering and tending to a few plants in a closet.
This is why people don't brew their own beer. Just because you can do it doesn't mean that people will do it. The fact of the matter is...most weed smokers simply will not grow their own weed.
Fans of high-priced pot and corporate control (you?) are in heaven. LOL.
I'm a fan of corporate control because I believe residents should be allowed to grow for retail out of their homes and compete against bigger operations? Again, you're not making a single bit of sense. The regulations I'm proposing would cause prices to drop. You're the one defending a big system that allows guys like that Subway shop owner to be the only participants in the industry. It's amazing how you're criticizing your own system and simultaneously defending it. You don't seem like you're a smart guy. You're not comprehending what I'm saying and you're not comprehending what your saying before you post it.
The regulations you're speaking in defense of are the regulations that are causing those high prices that you're whining about. Talking to you is like showing a creationist evidence of evolution. There is no logic in anything you have to say on the subject.
P.S. People like Subway guy will probably realize there is more of stable profit in wholesale purchasing from small craft growers who produce a better product. The profit margins per pound won't be as large as the dispensary owner who grows his stock himself, but that's irrelevant when the pounds are a better a quality that is guaranteed to sell and produce a profit. These dispensaries keep closing because they're not producing a good enough product. Not because there isn't a market.
the drama is caused by the folks posting about CO who don't live in CO to know what they are talking about. That's the message I keep getting.
The drama is caused by people who are tired of the low quality, overpriced, pesticide covered weed your state is producing, as a result of your laws. Resident, or not. It's caused by people who would like to pay taxes on the weed they grow in their homes. As opposed to participating in the black market.
It's justified drama being criticized by a bunch of Colorado residents who simply can't make a good point in defense of it.Other than, "Oh well, laws are better than Oklahoma."
Last edited: