So in this sense, something being a THC "antagonist" is a good thing, yes? Regardless of whether that substance is CBD or THCV as pops suggests below.peanutbutter said:One way that THC antagonists show themselves is in the duration of effect of the THC. The onset of effects take a little longer and the high lasts longer.
Onset delay of about 15-20 min. and duration of as much as four hours vs 1.5 without.
Think creeper weed.
Which could mean that several strains in circulation contain this antagonist, most of the stuff I grow is seriously creeper. Now, if CBD is causing the creeper effect, as you suggest, how can we say that none of the modern strains have significant CBD?
In any case that statement sounds extreme to me, especially when something as abstract as "western breeding" gets blamed. What's that supposed to mean??? Seems like the usual stoner paranoia / love of conspiracy theories coming into play. I mean there are hundreds of Afghans, Pakis and Indians on the market, and more coming in all the time!
Are you seriously suggesting that the.... "Dutch" (ROFLMAO) are sitting there waiting to select out anything with CBD because it would make weed too creeper? Sounds daft, no?
In fact if CBD enhances the experience of the smoke, you'd think people would select for it, as a nice smoke will make for more customers. It is evident from these pages that lots of people want a nice mellow anxiety-free smoke, I bet a lot more than those after hyped supposedly-high-THC stuff.
Last edited: