well iv put my cab on the back burner for a while. i ran across a 4.4 cubic foot mini fridge and cant decide on the ventilation. would 2 41cfm fans side by side be suffecient enough 2 keep the temps down? i stil havnt decided if im going with a 150 watt hps or 200 watt cfl. so temps could become an issue as far as the hps goes. not realy sure how much heat the 200 watt cfl puts out and id rather over do the ventilation than not enough. i should have some pics posted of the mini fride with in a couple weeks when i start the demo and reconstruction. this will be my first build so keep your fingers crossed.
redgreenry: With the two stage design do you mean to say that each chamber would be vented separately and the lights would also be vented separately?
So for example, say you have a cooltube in a single chamber for flowering. That would mean the entire ventilation of the cabinet would contain:
Is that correct?
- A single fan would ventilate the light. It would be a flow through system with no scrubber
- A single fan would ventilate the grow chamber. This would have a carbon filter, but it would be divided into two stages to allow for minimal pressure loss.
-Phr3
Yes, that's the basic design. The lights get the full unrestricted airflow of a axial fan. Size the scrubber to the number of air changes/ minute to keep the plants happy. Scrubbers block airflow so they don't belong on the duct connected to the lights.
This is the most efficienct way to ventilate your air box. Requires two fans and a way of isolating the lights from the grow chamber but makes the fans much smaller, cheaper and quiet.
Check out my R2D2 and 150HPS cab designs which use 2 stage cooling. I get the maximum performance out of computer fans.
Two fans in Series increases the Pressure. Two fans in Parallel increases the Flow. The actual increase depends on the fan curve and the system resistance curve. Most guys think doubling up will give double results but becuase the ventilation calculations have squares and square roots in them the results are 1.4 not 2.0 times at best.
Thanks to everyone for dropping by. If anyone has a ventilation problem or a system that needs to be tinkered with don't be afraid to drop by. I've already fixed a couple of guys up already.
Earlier in the thread I believe you said in parallel obtains 200% cfm but no increase in pressure. Just confirming this with you, and lets say both fans are 6" centrifugal, how would I have to configure my ducting to maximize the cfm? 6" to 8" adapters and a 8" Y to a 8" exhaust? Could I just run two 6" blowers to a Y leading to a single 6" exhaust without killing cfm too badly? Already cut a 6" hole in my attic itd take a while to re-do, I ordered 2 fans when I needed only 1 I guess but if I can put it to good use, then hey.. why not. ( Keep cfm the same and be able to turn the fans down ). Would this work? Sorry for lack of grammar, too high to think
My scrubber is 6" so I guess 8" ducting wouldnt help since it has that bottleneck?
Basically can I run a 6" duct from my 6" 50lb scrubber, run it to a Y or T, have a fan on each leg of that split, then merge the ducts again and exhaust thru the hole I cut, or would I need a 2nd or larger scrubber?
Or I could put the 2nd fan to use scrubbing my living ( read smoking ) area, eliminating the need for me to re-up on incense every few days and look suspicous