What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Trump thread part 2 (Or anything else we want to talk about that's ridiculous in politics today)

Porky82

Well-known member
hypoxia is real porky and not ' fucking bullshit' . do you wear a face mask porky? sat on business class with your stupid tattoos and gimp mask on .
either you pretend to be a business owner or you pretend to be a aussie green commie . or are you both ? some kind of hybrid retard?
Fuck just leave ya hovel and go outside you pathetic little man. 🤣
You scared of masks your sacred of outdoor activities your delusional of your own intelligence.
You trying to insult me because I can afford holidays and have tattoos. 🤣
Your a sad little pauper pommy who has nothing more than a computer in his bedroom at his mums house. 😉
images.jpeg
 

shiva82

Well-known member
Fuck just leave ya hovel and go outside you pathetic little man. 🤣
You scared of masks your sacred of outdoor activities your delusional of your own intelligence.
You trying to insult me because I can afford holidays and have tattoos. 🤣
Your a sad little pauper pommy who has nothing more than a computer in his bedroom at his mums house. 😉
View attachment 19104221
you are mentally unwell . which is fine . i can help
 

Captain Red Eye

Active member
I don't know about you but I like drugs and whores and guns.

case closed.

Drugs and whores and guns aren't the big issues with Hunter's laptop though.

It's the coverup / denial of the existence of the laptop to help swing an election and the possibility the big guy was getting 10%.

Case wide open.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
apparently migrants are welcome, but not in the playground of the rich... just an observation
you've gotta be some sorta truth whisperer, what a challenging conclusion to have come to... was the journey perilous?

i'll throw you a bone for the next fact: they don't like em brown, either
 

Captain Red Eye

Active member
regardless if the age of consent was 17 (it's not), a grown 40+ year old man having sex with a 17 year old is still illegal. the exemption is carved out for up to 23 year olds, and that is still high. 23 to 16 is predatory still in my opinon.

View attachment 19104105

This close in age thing is interesting, it appears to be legislating morality, rather than protecting a person from having their actual consent violated.

If I understand the info. in your post correctly, a young lady is "lawfully" capable of consenting to sex with a person close to her age, but not capable of consenting to sex with somebody beyond a certain age, set by some group of all-knowing legislators. Looks like, according to the law, it's okay for a young lady to consent to bouncing on a firm and erect young penis, but if the penis is "too old", she couldn't possibly consent to that.

What if a 35 year old guy, got John Bobbitted (ouch!) and had a new, but younger penis stitched on? Do you think the young lady would be able to actually and "lawfully", consent to that? "Oh well Mr. 35 year old, I see your penis was donated by a 19 year old cadaver, therefore you're not raping me,
let's get it on" !!

How does the age of a penis effect the ability of the young lady involved to consent or not?

I suppose the same question would apply if things were reversed. A young guy of 17 can bang a 22 year old woman, but if he bangs a 35 year old woman, even if he really likes it, he's being raped.

It sounds like this law attempts to redefine the meaning of consent to mean, it's whatever the law says and not what the actual people involved have or have not consented to.

Also, if age differences are the criteria used to determine a person being "taken advantage of" I wonder why there's no legislation preventing hot 40 something year old gold digging women from banging rich 85 year old men? Are those 85 year old men being raped? 40 something gold digging hot chick being raped? I mean there's an age difference of 45 years!!
1732271815063.png
1732272023066.png
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
I don’t understand how these guys have all this power and not smart enough to not get caught.
Presidents, Kings, Tyrants, & Despots


I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way against holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. That is the point at which the negation of Catholicism and the negation of Liberalism meet and keep high festival, and the end learns to justify the means. You would hang a man of no position, like Ravaillac; but if what one hears is true, then Elizabeth asked the gaoler to murder Mary, and William III ordered his Scots minister to extirpate a clan. Here are the greater names coupled with the greater crimes. You would spare these criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them, higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice; still more, still higher, for the sake of historical science.
John Emerich Edward Dalberg, Lord Acton
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Presidents, Kings, Tyrants, & Despots


I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way against holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. That is the point at which the negation of Catholicism and the negation of Liberalism meet and keep high festival, and the end learns to justify the means. You would hang a man of no position, like Ravaillac; but if what one hears is true, then Elizabeth asked the gaoler to murder Mary, and William III ordered his Scots minister to extirpate a clan. Here are the greater names coupled with the greater crimes. You would spare these criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them, higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice; still more, still higher, for the sake of historical science.
John Emerich Edward Dalberg, Lord Acton

Uhh what ? 😂😂
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
Uhh what ? 😂😂
Just sound the words out.

Lord Acton writes to Bishop Creighton that the same moral standards should be applied to all men, political and religious leaders included, especially since “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887)
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Just sound the words out.

Lord Acton writes to Bishop Creighton that the same moral standards should be applied to all men, political and religious leaders included, especially since “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887)

I’m just trying to understand why your trying to tell me all this ? Seems like you have made some kind of false assumption about something I said
 

zachrockbadenof

Well-known member
Veteran
you've gotta be some sorta truth whisperer, what a challenging conclusion to have come to... was the journey perilous?

i'll throw you a bone for the next fact: they don't like em brown, either
the journey was fine, encountered no illegals... and even better no liberals.... it was a fine trip
 

iTarzan

Well-known member
Veteran
Attention non U.S.A. citizens. Your countries are pathetic. You can't do or achieve anything without help from the U.S.A. You love to accept our monetary help. You can't even fight to save your country without our physical and monetary help. You always need our scientific, engineering and medical assistance. We had to come up with a vaccine for you pathetic pussies. You can't even save trapped miners, kids in caves, fight off Russia or China without us. You idiotic weaklings let your governments take your guns. You don't have half the freedom we have in America. You all need to STFU about U.S.A. politics. I have no desire to even talk to you foreigners about such stuff. I want to puke when I find out I am arguing with somebody not an American US citizen.
Fact is the good old U.S.A. can literally destroy all of you. The U.S.A. could defeat the entire world if we were so inclined but we don't. We help the entire world and the thanks we get is a bunch of freeloaders telling us how terrible we are.

Some of you get to go on holidays though. Do you know why? Because your countries have been mooching off the U.S.A. so you can have paid holidays.
The U.S.A. is better than your country. Stronger, smarter, braver, more resilient, more generous, better doctors, lawyers, builders, thinkers and just better in general.
Don't ever forget we could take you out. We don't though. We take care of you like our own pet ant farm.
It is time we cut you off. Trump is going to cut you off. That is what you are worried about.

Now get the fuck out of this thread. Go start the "What will we do without help from the U.S.A." thread.

Losers!!!!
 

Captain Red Eye

Active member
Just sound the words out.

Lord Acton writes to Bishop Creighton that the same moral standards should be applied to all men, political and religious leaders included, especially since “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887)

Those are good points.

Legal standards exempt some people from moral standards, which should raise suspicions from authority worshippers.

The vaunted "founding fathers" hypocrisy is exposed, since many were slave owners. They talked the talk, but didn't always walk the walk, while blathering on about liberty and all that.
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
I read your reply that I quoted above and responded to it. In my mind I understood about power and corruption leading to getting caught. Do you understand now?
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top