yes every where they say you are supposed to carry id, but not everywhere are you asked to produce said id when just walking down the road or some thing like that.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Trump cancels summit with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un
- Thread starter Tudo
- Start date
- Status
No we don't have a national ID card system that is compulsory in the UK, and you are not required by law to carry any identification papers on you even while driving a car....
This is one of the reasons why so many illegal migrants like to come to the UK because they can ditch their old national identity and 'reinvent' themselves as a 'refugee'....
This is one of the reasons why so many illegal migrants like to come to the UK because they can ditch their old national identity and 'reinvent' themselves as a 'refugee'....
yup. Nixon used extralegal efforts trying to bring Timothy Leary to heel after he escaped from jail & fled to Algeria & Switzerland. the US tried to have the Swiss extradite him (Algeria told them to go fuck themselves) but they looked at what he was accused of (possession of 2 roaches) and agreed with Algeria. but, you know? having trump agreeing with Nixon does not look good in the long term for trump or what is left of the gop, LOL!
These, and the medic's post that I put up, exemplify why this crap has got to change. Europe has shot themselves in the foot with unbridled immigration and rather than follow them off of the cliff, the US needs to put a stop to the leakage across a phenomenally porous border. We need to stop abrogating citizen's rights and stop creating an attractive nuisance that is getting people killed or horrifically abused.
Boo hoo. After that lady kicked her out, she followed her across the street to another restaurant and continued to harass her. Classy.
As if generating and driving the refugees had not been a deliberate event.
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
I was in the US this week to catch a concert. We stayed in a BnB where the host was a retired constitutional lawyer. She told me something I never knew. As a tourist, or even an immigrant, the instant you step foot in the USA you are protected by the Constitution. Almost completely (can't vote).
Here's a quick search on the topic.
"The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law."
"once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
ZADVYDAS v. DAVIS
"U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education"
Plyler vs. Doe
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens - for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
Here's a quick search on the topic.
"The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law."
"once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
ZADVYDAS v. DAVIS
"U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education"
Plyler vs. Doe
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens - for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
This post appeared to have some credibility until it took a pro trump ending.
I guess any media besides fox is discrediting trump, since they are the only ones reporting unfavorable news?
You missed the point, AND did some selective editing - "[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Personally I could care less what you think of President Trump but where I draw the line is when we start taking down innocent people and painting them as villains in an effort to destroy someone else. These GOOD POEPLE working on this crisis have done so for the past 15 years without one word from anyone else until just recently."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]15 years of the same old, same old, and it wasn't an issue until a week or so ago. What conclusion would you draw from that?
[/FONT]
rives, when someone shows a concern for trump getting bad press it’s worth asking why that is.
Certain bias being displayed is the point.
If a person was able to focus on one thing at a time versus 24/7 deflect mode, maybe that would simplify things.
rives, it does NOT matter why that bloated lying pig was thrown out!!! her response should NOT have been on her PressScy twitter account, period!!!
BOLD & RED is what MANY consider her criticizing (I refer to as bitching out) the restaurant owner, period!!!
I'm going one step farther here, highlighted in BOLD & BLUE are Sarah's 5 magic words, her typical Republican 'get out of jail free' card w/a bullshit phrase... "I always do my best"
So when she fails as in this case she can write it off as 'she tried her best' but guess what, it just wasn't good enough. FAIL Sarah FAIL.
She along with the little orange man will go down in history as the biggest fucking liars to step foot on Capitol Hill.......
if thats an ethics violation what would it be if she did some personal trading on info she gets in her job? thats also an ethics violation right? you see where i'm going with this right? you are diluting the word, just like people do when they use the Nazi word because the barman says you had enough, or when you compare Putin to Hitler, it dilutes the evil he did. words must be chosen with care in these situations. what she did was mix up her twitter account or add a personal comment on her official account, it's nothing, it's such a small thing to jump on with so much energy that it just looks weird imo. not you, but the msm in general.
I think that it had far less to do with concern about Trump getting bad press than the FACT that it has been going on for 15 years with no notice until it can be used to attack Trump. Same thing with the foil blanket/cage pictures from 2014 - they were met with a large yawn under Obama, but now everyone is pissing down their legs. Anyone who is the slightest bit rational would question why that is, and come to the obvious conclusion.
Who cares....
The Obama administration basically took over the upper echelons of the DOJ and illegally used every tool at their disposal to torpedo a Presidential candidate, including forbidding the IG access to the department responsible. Somehow, you choose to ignore that and are concerned about a press secretary saying, correctly, that the Pussyhat wearing moron's actions said more about her than it did the press secretary. No hyperventilating rhetoric or large bold font is going to make it something that doesn't even rise to an insignificant transgression.
I didn't use the word Nazi, but I can see how people think that way. The whole political world moves further to the right, the press gets suppressed, and we are divided with propaganda. Authoritarian government takes babies away from their mothers. Sound like something from your history book?
We have already moved far to the right with billionaires voices millions of times more powerful than a single voter. I don't think this is what they had in mind at the inception.
- Status
