zanog
Member
Hmm I was thinking that terpenes make the weed good, modifying thc effects? Is that untrue?
-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
True Terpenes VISCOSITY extract liquifier LAB TESTS: Mineral oil but no terps!!
- Thread starter ExtractNinja
- Start date
Some more than others. Terpenes like Linalool and and Myrcene make a profound difference, but some others, not so much.
Terpenes like Pulegone and Myrcene are also suspected of being a carcinogen in the land of CA.
All make the dab harsher and some don't taste like they smell.
By offering them a position after certain circumstances have been met you are only supporting the continuance of lies.
There is zero room for deceit withing a community that seeks truth for their health!
True Terpenes does not deserve to be a part of any community that they may deceive in the future. As a matter of fact, due to the number of individuals they have deceived, they deserve to be sued out of existence. But that probably wont happen so it becomes the jobs of regular folks to inform others about True Terpenes deceitful advertising practices. As a matter of fact, you, Dustin/Future4200, have obligated yourself to placing True Terpenes on blast all over the community! Failing to do so shows your integrity.
CannaRed
Cannabinerd
Worded perfectly.
Future4200
Member
They have been removed from the GLG, and we have decided they will not be allowed back in.
They have been publicly denounced, and each one of our 750 members has been privately informed that TT lied about their product which is why they were booted.
They have been publicly denounced, and each one of our 750 members has been privately informed that TT lied about their product which is why they were booted.
I believe oxidation/degradation products (carotenoids,floral aroma)sugar transformations and plethora of other "new" molecules from standard and long term exotic cures also play a large part in making weed good. Let or make a bud be all it can be, I'm wondering if some of the heavier less flighty terpenes also transform with time etc. Some want garden fresh I want rank and stanky!
Which begs the question of where is EN, and what have you done since being vindicated and handed the keys to the city?
To a previous question raised, if TT was going to respond to my questions, they ostensibly would have.
While we await the requested data, may I suggest simply voting with our feet, with regard to TT products, based on what we already know for certain?
In one hand we have their declarations of purity and industrial leadership in QC, while in the other actual test results flying in the face of those claims.
What actually happened is no doubt faaaar less mal-intended than our worst case imagined scenario, but if TT can't share enough information for us to start to rebuild a semblance of trust, how can a sane prudent person justify risking using their products???
haze*ekiel420
Well-known member
What i learn of all this is Simply to Stick to Bud ans homemade extract.. iso is bought at a Pharmazie, and purged till clean.. but mostly bud and Dry sieve will do fine..
Sometimes Good Import...
But Why Risk my Health to Hype style consumption...
Take care
Sometimes Good Import...
But Why Risk my Health to Hype style consumption...
Take care
If you make your own, you know what's in it and what not.
Easy peasy
Easy peasy
Any chance you might be willing to share said peasy method?
In five short months there has been 65630 views of this post.
There are lots of similar quotes but I'll use Warren Buffets version which says "It takes a lifetime to build a reputation and only five minutes to destroy it. If you think about that you'll do things differently."
I've studied quite a bit about reputation over the last several years and crisis management and this is a textbook example of what not to do.
Rule number one is being prepared and educated about what constitutes a reputation risk/crisis event and then what you do about it. In determining a crisis rule one for that is protect the public, don't hurt anybody or be percieved even as not caring.
Own it get in front of it admit your part, the penalty you paid and what your doing about it. I was watching TV a while back and a commercial from PGnE came on talking about the pipeline explosion. They said what happened why it happened how big a fine they paid the pipes replaced how they were inspecting everything and a new modern control center. I thought THAT is how professional reputation people do it.
There are two really good short articles by Harvard Business Review. Reputation and its Risks and Reputation Warfare. The second talks about what happened here except all of you were straight up, the article talked about the damage one cook can do on social media. A good example is the Deep Water Horizon spill.
A guy opened a similar sounding tweet account and in the middle of the crisis posted mundane stuff like the lunch menu and people were so made it retweeted give times the number of the real account. Or in Palestine. Israel has the superior army but the Palestinians won the public opinion war, that one is called bullets and blogs.
And finally an example of the US Census Bureau bought a 15 second super bowl ad saying mail in your forms and watchdog groups learned about it and went nuts. John McCain brought it up on the senate floor saying it was a waste of money. The census bureau had a media monitoring service contract that alerts you when negative news hits anything including social media.
They had a plan that came with the service you pay a monthly fee. They went on youtube, tweeted and Facebook saying how if just some small number mailed in forms instead of sending a guy out in a car they would save 90 million dollars and by the time super bowl came it had died and the watchdog group tweeted to mail in your forms.
To me it was telling, if the freaking US Census Bureau cares more and manages their reputation better than the cannabis industry which is not at all we got a serous problem.
There are lots of similar quotes but I'll use Warren Buffets version which says "It takes a lifetime to build a reputation and only five minutes to destroy it. If you think about that you'll do things differently."
I've studied quite a bit about reputation over the last several years and crisis management and this is a textbook example of what not to do.
Rule number one is being prepared and educated about what constitutes a reputation risk/crisis event and then what you do about it. In determining a crisis rule one for that is protect the public, don't hurt anybody or be percieved even as not caring.
Own it get in front of it admit your part, the penalty you paid and what your doing about it. I was watching TV a while back and a commercial from PGnE came on talking about the pipeline explosion. They said what happened why it happened how big a fine they paid the pipes replaced how they were inspecting everything and a new modern control center. I thought THAT is how professional reputation people do it.
There are two really good short articles by Harvard Business Review. Reputation and its Risks and Reputation Warfare. The second talks about what happened here except all of you were straight up, the article talked about the damage one cook can do on social media. A good example is the Deep Water Horizon spill.
A guy opened a similar sounding tweet account and in the middle of the crisis posted mundane stuff like the lunch menu and people were so made it retweeted give times the number of the real account. Or in Palestine. Israel has the superior army but the Palestinians won the public opinion war, that one is called bullets and blogs.
And finally an example of the US Census Bureau bought a 15 second super bowl ad saying mail in your forms and watchdog groups learned about it and went nuts. John McCain brought it up on the senate floor saying it was a waste of money. The census bureau had a media monitoring service contract that alerts you when negative news hits anything including social media.
They had a plan that came with the service you pay a monthly fee. They went on youtube, tweeted and Facebook saying how if just some small number mailed in forms instead of sending a guy out in a car they would save 90 million dollars and by the time super bowl came it had died and the watchdog group tweeted to mail in your forms.
To me it was telling, if the freaking US Census Bureau cares more and manages their reputation better than the cannabis industry which is not at all we got a serous problem.
http://centeronreputation.com/brand-vs-reputation/
Anybody in business should read this short report its really good. It is what the cannabis industry should be doing but isn't.
I think it has something to do with throwing a ball on a train or a cat in a box...cant remember...maybe shining a light through two slits ...damn ADHD...look a squirrel!
Anybody in business should read this short report its really good. It is what the cannabis industry should be doing but isn't.
I think it has something to do with throwing a ball on a train or a cat in a box...cant remember...maybe shining a light through two slits ...damn ADHD...look a squirrel!
I am just curious. If someone were to pay you money, would you, then share your knowledge?
Thanks
Thanks
AgentPothead
Just this guy, ya know?
So will anything actually happen or are they just gonna keep peddling poison and profiting off public perception?
S
Sertaiz
ahahahahahaha that is hilarious. what a joke.
what is 100 percent terpenes supposed to mean?
what crazyness is this?
bill clinton definition of is.
thank you for posting, this is funny.
what is 100 percent terpenes supposed to mean?
what crazyness is this?
bill clinton definition of is.
thank you for posting, this is funny.
