demonicaardvark
Member
little by little our rights are being taken away, id hate to see what its going to be like in a couple years.
-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Pablo
Member
Paranoia pays for your freedom . - Casey Chaos ,
I've got something to hide , my person . Which is mine .
How has being guilty till proven innocent come about . This is all propaganda aimed at making us feel safe , safe from what . Some "Orwellian" never ending war ?
Piece by piece our rights are going and for what . An invasion of oil producing countries (Iran to follow) , Attacks in New York and London , both having proof of secret service involvement .
UK has 1/5 of cctv to watch the people , supposed to make the country safer . Crime continues to rise . Luckily US is too large for mass installation of cctv , but there in place are satilites(sp) .To catch terrorists .....right.
If you think these dangerous machines make flying safer think again people.
Security services or a rogue spin-off we slip in behind airport security so the machines are there for another reason.
Alex Jones warned that the attack on the WTC would happen a year before it did, even naming Bin Laden as the scapegoat. He asked us to call Senators and let them know we know , putting phone numbers on the screen.
And the sheep still follow the shepperd.....
We are all too comfortable in our stoned lives to think about changing what is happening . I think it's too late anyway and a world war of civil war might sort the problems out .
Nazi Germany and Red Russia at their best could only have dreamed of having so much control over their citizens.
I've got something to hide , my person . Which is mine .
How has being guilty till proven innocent come about . This is all propaganda aimed at making us feel safe , safe from what . Some "Orwellian" never ending war ?
Piece by piece our rights are going and for what . An invasion of oil producing countries (Iran to follow) , Attacks in New York and London , both having proof of secret service involvement .
UK has 1/5 of cctv to watch the people , supposed to make the country safer . Crime continues to rise . Luckily US is too large for mass installation of cctv , but there in place are satilites(sp) .To catch terrorists .....right.
If you think these dangerous machines make flying safer think again people.
Security services or a rogue spin-off we slip in behind airport security so the machines are there for another reason.
Alex Jones warned that the attack on the WTC would happen a year before it did, even naming Bin Laden as the scapegoat. He asked us to call Senators and let them know we know , putting phone numbers on the screen.
And the sheep still follow the shepperd.....
We are all too comfortable in our stoned lives to think about changing what is happening . I think it's too late anyway and a world war of civil war might sort the problems out .
Nazi Germany and Red Russia at their best could only have dreamed of having so much control over their citizens.
How did being guilty until proved innocent come about?
Simple, they wanted to invade iraq, but there were no weapons of mass destruction to be found, how could they do it? They stopped saying we will search for your weapons to prove you guilty, you must prove you haven't got them, and if you can't we will invade. Then they realised, hey this is handy, lets use this arguement more, and they applied it to their own people, its the same thing going on here in the uk at the moment. They are moving to a french stance. Where you have always needed to prove you are innocent rather than anyone needing to prove you are guilty. Its much handier for the ruling class to pick out those they object to this way. Even though the French used it to weed out the ruling classes. Not saying there are any lessons to be learned from France, but I would have thought the ruling classes would be nervous about adopting French habbits incase the people do too.
Simple, they wanted to invade iraq, but there were no weapons of mass destruction to be found, how could they do it? They stopped saying we will search for your weapons to prove you guilty, you must prove you haven't got them, and if you can't we will invade. Then they realised, hey this is handy, lets use this arguement more, and they applied it to their own people, its the same thing going on here in the uk at the moment. They are moving to a french stance. Where you have always needed to prove you are innocent rather than anyone needing to prove you are guilty. Its much handier for the ruling class to pick out those they object to this way. Even though the French used it to weed out the ruling classes. Not saying there are any lessons to be learned from France, but I would have thought the ruling classes would be nervous about adopting French habbits incase the people do too.
u got that GMT, its fuckery mate, absoloue fuckery
moose eater said:
Moose ...sorry that's only a joke .... : )
I know what the threads about ....I have been searched once or twice myself
best advice
Dont get CaughtPeace
no your advice was good : ) ///
GMt !
Harry
Peace
GMt !
Harry
Peace
The backscatter scanners have been around for at least two years, problem is they are god awful expensive and lack enough qualified operators to make them more than secondary scanners of suspect people only that fail the initial scanners and the follow up wandings.
I have seen them in almost all the major airports I have gone thru and every single one of them wasnt being used. Easy to tell them from the regular scanners since they look like a big giant square box instead of the typical thin rectangle unit that does the mass scannings.
Doesnt bother me too much since I dont carry my weed in a tin, I also cant remember the last time I flew anywhere in the US without weed. Then again I have no criminal record to look up either, if you do I wouldnt carry at all near an airport since they will violate any and all privacy you have in the name of preventing terrorism.
I have seen them in almost all the major airports I have gone thru and every single one of them wasnt being used. Easy to tell them from the regular scanners since they look like a big giant square box instead of the typical thin rectangle unit that does the mass scannings.
Doesnt bother me too much since I dont carry my weed in a tin, I also cant remember the last time I flew anywhere in the US without weed. Then again I have no criminal record to look up either, if you do I wouldnt carry at all near an airport since they will violate any and all privacy you have in the name of preventing terrorism.
Not sure if anyone posted what they look like but heres one and their results. Plenty of time to ditch yer stash if your waiting in line for one of these.
I also just saw a flawed area on the scan, looks like if you sock-stash your stuff in front of your shin bone it gets lost in the front side scan of you unlike the backside scan does.. good to know.
I also just saw a flawed area on the scan, looks like if you sock-stash your stuff in front of your shin bone it gets lost in the front side scan of you unlike the backside scan does.. good to know.
Last edited:
J
Jam Master Jaco
Verite said:
Thank you for clarifying all that, I was just about to post what you said in your first few sentences, that the scanners are only used if you fail the first set of scannings.
Either way people, as Mr. Nevermind and a few others pointed out, flying is a priviledge, not a right. You don't want to show your X-rayed penis to someone to get on a flight? Then don't fly.
