Brother you realize the information you got from google research on AER model google took from ic mags this post
So... you just sat at a desk and thought of something and think this is good enough to share it?I don't get your point man, this model i created with critital thought and used ai for conversing with to make model and put into a format for sharing? if you like the model good, but dont say i stole it. it is my work i want to share no one elses. google got the information from this post.
If you want to use the AER or like the information good, but if not stop making assumptions like the other guy saying it wasn't my ideas or that i just thought of some idea's its alot more complex with that and this idea is the results of 1000;s of hours of research and thought over time that led to me able to make the associations and connections and to understand the plant at such a level. if you want to make assumptions as well like saying i "So... you just sat at a desk and thought of something and think this is good enough to share it?" go to someone elses thread, if you have a critical response why this model doesn't work or a question pertaining to it great, but you and the other dude if your just being trolls your not welcome on this thread just to try and get a rise out of me, or say some bullshit about scientific research without even contributing intellectually to the conversation.So... you just sat at a desk and thought of something and think this is good enough to share it?
I mean... that's how science worked in the 19th century. You look at two things, e.g. Shiva and Zeus, ascertain that both have a lightning bolt and BAM! it's the same. That there are 5000 years and 10000 km between both cultures doesn't matter. (that's how you sound, but with more rambling and less education)
In the modern world hypothesis are tested by experiment. Go ahead, make a controlled experiment that tries to disprove your point and if you fail to do so repeatedly you're up to something.
Why is your thing that you just thought up more credible than 100 years of modern biology, which is backed by experiment and was revised many times as new evidence was presented?If you want to use the AER or like the information good, but if not stop making assumptions like the other guy saying it wasn't my ideas or that i just thought of some idea's its alot more complex with that and this idea is the results of 1000;s of hours of research and thought over time that led to me able to make the associations and connections and to understand the plant at such a level. if you want to make assumptions as well like saying i "So... you just sat at a desk and thought of something and think this is good enough to share it?" go to someone elses thread, if you have a critical response why this model doesn't work or a question pertaining to it great, but you and the other dude if your just being trolls your not welcome on this thread just to try and get a rise out of me, or say some bullshit about scientific research without even contributing intellectually to the conversation.
This is why I didn't even read his garbage.So... you just sat at a desk and thought of something and think this is good enough to share it?
I mean... that's how science worked in the 19th century. You look at two things, e.g. Shiva and Zeus, ascertain that both have a lightning bolt and BAM! it's the same. That there are 5000 years and 10000 km between both cultures doesn't matter. (that's how you sound, but with more rambling and less education)
In the modern world hypothesis are tested by experiment. Go ahead, make a controlled experiment that tries to disprove your point and if you fail to do so repeatedly you're up to something.
Why is your thing that you just thought up more credible than 100 years of modern biology, which is backed by experiment and was revised many times as new evidence was presented?
Your rambling is full of logical errors. For example you say that photoreceptors do not measure the lenght of days but rather the intensity of light. But what is night if not low intensity light? Integrating both signals yields to the same result: lenght of day.
I could go on buy why argue with a chatbot...
Both of you guy's are fool's, yes i did think of something that is better than 100 years of scientific research that was based on the wrong ideas, and sally dont lie you didnt read it because you don't understand.This is why I didn't even read his garbage.
Cool, can you poke me when you won a noble prize/became a billionaire/cured cancer (or all 3 at the same time). While you're waiting for your accolades I recommend you read the following article. It's a good 20 years old and excellently makes the point why your thought experiment is irrelevant: biology is unimaginably complex. It doesn't follow logic.Both of you guy's are fool's, yes i did think of something that is better than 100 years of scientific research that was based on the wrong ideas, and sally dont lie you didnt read it because you don't understand.
Not sure why you would pick a fight with me as I have a degree in Biology, Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics, and Chemical Engineering. As indicated in previous posts you are not adding anything and your understanding is layman/rural. I suggest you learn how to write without inflaming half your audience before they even start reading. For the most part you have a child's vocabulary, lack social skills, and are a crappy person to even try to communicate with let alone to debate. Have fun with yourself and don't bother responding as I have added you to my ignore list for being a disrespectful person.Both of you guy's are fool's, yes i did think of something that is better than 100 years of scientific research that was based on the wrong ideas, and sally dont lie you didnt read it because you don't understand.
It seems like those degrees are about as good as toilet paper if you have nothing intelligent to add to conversation or can consider my ideas, the fact that you have all these degrees and wont even read my information further supports why i have my position on current science being close minded and structured in a way it keeps the minds of the people in that institution very rigid.Not sure why you would pick a fight with me as I have a degree in Biology, Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics, and Chemical Engineering. As indicated in previous posts you are not adding anything and your understanding is layman/rural. I suggest you learn how to write without inflaming half your audience before they even start reading. For the most part you have a child's vocabulary, lack social skills, and are a crappy person to even try to communicate with let alone to debate. Have fun with yourself and don't bother responding as I have added you to my ignore list for being a disrespectful person.
Ps i looked at your grows try to grow a plant without burning its leaf tips...i have no degrees and can grow a plant without nute burns. notice my carangola f1 plantlings no leaf burnNot sure why you would pick a fight with me as I have a degree in Biology, Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics, and Chemical Engineering. As indicated in previous posts you are not adding anything and your understanding is layman/rural. I suggest you learn how to write without inflaming half your audience before they even start reading. For the most part you have a child's vocabulary, lack social skills, and are a crappy person to even try to communicate with let alone to debate. Have fun with yourself and don't bother responding as I have added you to my ignore list for being a disrespectful person.
Thankyou, Since it seems some members appreciate this information ill add a few more bits that tie into the model:Thankyou for sharing your research and starting a conversation. I’m not surprised to read intellectual ego’s going into complete disrespect of your findings. I would rather read a critical scientific response with factual evidence rather than childish tantrums and abrasive words towards your intelligence.
pH Range | Dominant Terpenes | Effect Characteristics | Nutrient Profile |
5.5 (Acidic) | Sesquiterpenes (e.g., beta-caryophyllene, humulene, bisabolol) | Slow onset, creeper high; long-lasting; grounding and relaxing. Can also produce uplifting effects depending on the profile. | High Mn, Fe, Zn; low Ca, Mg; moderate K |
6.4 (Balanced) | Balanced (Mix of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes) | Immediate lift with sustained effects; balanced cerebral and physical high. Versatile in experience. | Balanced macro- and micronutrient availability |
7.2 (Alkaline) | Monoterpenes (e.g., limonene, pinene, myrcene) | Fast onset, strong rush; shorter-lived; uplifting and energetic. Can also produce sedative effects if high in myrcene. | High Ca, Mg; moderate K; low Mn, Fe, Zn |
pH Range | Structure | Hormonal Profile |
5.5 | Vine-like, sprawling | High auxins, high cytokinins, low gibberellins, low amplitude |
6.4 | Tree-like, upright | Balanced auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins; medium amplitude |
7.2 | Bush-like, compact | Moderate auxins, high cytokinins, moderate gibberellins, low amplitude |
Aspect | 5.5 (Acidic) | 6.4 (Balanced) | 7.2 (Alkaline) |
Dominant Terpenes | Sesquiterpenes | Balanced | Monoterpenes |
Onset | Slow, creeper | Immediate and sustained | Fast and intense |
Duration | Long-lasting | Moderate | Short-lived |
Effect Type | Grounding, relaxing | Balanced, versatile | Energetic, uplifting |
Structure | Vine-like, sprawling | Tree-like, upright | Bush-like, compact |
Applications | Relaxation, medicinal | General use, versatility | Quick relief, energy |
Tha Ai can be a great tool if used correctly, my observations combined with the ai's knowledge has allowed me to get this far, after i have detailed conversations and upload data from previous conversations, i can talk about these things with a source that knows the answers to most of my questions, then when the understanding if corrected, I can have the ai make a paper of the knowledge so i can save and don't forget about pieces of it. It does this in such an efficient and good way most of the time, sometimes it confuses ideas and misintreprets but you have to double check it. I am sharing the ideas now regardless if i have proff here is a picture of a plant i flowered completely in rising daylight hours using pot and drought stress, I am an honest person, i would not try to intentionally lie to people for attention only. I think its important to share my idea's what if something happens to me today or tommorow, and i never get the chance to share again? I doubt that but I put alot of time and thought into these ideas and feel they are worthy of sharing with others on icmag. I do things my own way, i dont need to have an experient set up and record finding and take pictures ect and put alot of energy into seomthing that isnt paying me anything. I grow and learn for my own interest and understanding, no for work, just because i want to nothing more.hey bro.
grow more out
make observations..
log them
use your own words
don’t use AI
get back to us please
until then..
[as a not a scientist or mma fighter]
"there is something inside every seed that is triggered
either by time or photoperiod that makes it go to flower
...there maybe other factors that helper hinder it..
but I think thats the deal..
a short cut is along shot
Can you explain your idea then on photoperiodism? Pr—>Pfr and it’s reaction on short day plants? After which Critical Day Length vs DLI.I am trying to explain how flowering works, its more based on the auxin levels in the plant not the plant counting light hours, the reasons plants flower in reduced light hours is because they have less energy which in turn leads to less auxins or growth hormone. basically growth hormone and flowering compete, when the plant is low in growth hormone it flowers is how i am saying it works, science now says the plant counts the amount of light hours but cannot explain autolflowering and equitorial flowering in the same light as this model.
nah...with the ai's knowledge has allowed me to get this far,
Yes Sir, let me explain, how would i classify terpenes into different groups with the ai to tell me all their weights ect, to do the same work while using the internet and nit picking through information and building a chart would take hours where i can do the same thing with AI in minutes. even i was learning about strigolactones the other day and how they work with myrcorrhizae in the roots without ai i wouldnt even know what strigolactones are or how healthy they are for us, and i made a system to farm them in drinking water. heres example of how i classify the terpenes:nah...