The answer to your questions are yes, ...yes there have been noobs who have thought to add airstones and yes it is redundant and un-necessary.
Peace, SOG
Anybody have any links or side by side's with an airstone hempy bucket vs non airstone? I understand that hempy used to get quite grumpy when anybody tried to tinker with the system but I have yet to find anyone who has actually tried this despite the rhetoric of 'an airstone is not necesary'.
EVen if the airstone is not necesary to grow dank plants, I'm curious as to the effects or lack there of.
In one of my runs, i used cement mixing tubs as a coco/perlite hempy bed sog with an airstone in the bottom of the perlite. That run got me the most yield of any hempy grow. However, because there were too many variables I can't claim the airstone had anything to do wiht it. That being said, after seeing the growth rate of non aerated hempy buckets, it seemed quite apparant to me that the growth rate was more hydro like with the airstone.
It makes sense logically to me that aerating the internal res would result in faster growing plants.
Just like in Soma's sog beds where he uses pvc under the beds to increase o2 at the root zone (even though its not necesary as people grow dank all the time in beds with no pvc), there might be some improvement in the hempy bucket growth, despite it violating the simplicity rule.
In order to further illustrate this. Picture an undercurrent system of fast hydro with a perlite bucket sumberged 2 inches into the system. This is essentially an extreme version of 'hempy + airstone' concept. It would be hard to imagine that this system would not outyield a traditional hempy bucket.
Any one have any insights to share about this?