BotanicalBill
Member
..
You'd be surprised what you read in the paper here..
Another idea along those lines I had considered indoors was, assuming the fact that it's the amount of darkness that triggers flowering, not hours of light, which has always been my understandingm, I often wondered if you could decrease the total number of daylight hours to say 10 hours a day, but still keep it for 12 hours of darkness. This would knock off 14 hours from a plant's cycle a week(2 hours x 7 days), so in one 'real' month you're essentially really in the flowering cycle for 1 month + 2 days. After 2 months you've knocked off 4 days, and after a full year you're at 24 days extra of flowering. Obviously you're losing daylight and as a result yield, but I often wondered if being able to get almost another half-flowering cycle a year in to each calendar year would offset those benefits.. I never went through the hassle but it's just one more example of the endless possibilities with having total control..
BB
If they make a reliable soil moisture tester that puts out an electrical signal (4-20ma, 0-5V, 0-10V are common) then you could definitely make a smart watering system. One method of doing it is buying some HVAC control hardware (glorified PLCs) such as an Andover Controls LCX 810 which has I believe 8 analog/digital inputs, and 8 digital outputs. Wire the soil meters to the inputs, wire solenoids for the valves to the outputs, write a handful of lines of software, and away you go. You could take it farther and wire some potentiometers as well on the inputs that could serve as a "watering setpoint" for each zone so you wouldn't have to fire up a laptop every time you wanted to change the point at which watering occurs. I was in the HVAC controls industry for years and did this sort of thing all the time..
Hey Tom. Thank you. The above and earlier mentioned addressing more the specifics of scenario 2, as new to the California controlled daily access environment. I believe I had heard you state somewhere at sometime in the past regarding the above, backing off on feeding (dietary, levels) during extreme heat periods. (100's, high 100's, even 110+, etc...) I also then further wondered whether the option of lighter day to day feedings (waterings) might be better than the typical schedule if currently less. (daily reduction of temps of containers, medium.) Regardless of source (water) temps, I would think an easy 20-40 degree reduction in container temps right there.) Am no stranger to such heat levels, but in ground (right there a reduction in temps) pre prepped without day to day access/feedings, so, as above, a completely different matter/environment. (And due to specifics of such locations, another factor being probably used to, in such periods, a much, much higher humidity than CA, be that good or bad)TomHill said:Hi all,
I got a heads-up from a friend along the lines that alternate higher temperature feeding schedules should be addressed. I won't mention names, but he is most welcome to give his thoughts on this too, it's an interesting topic imo.
Here are some of my thoughts and it may perhaps relate to some of this auto water scheduling conversation.
When soil temps rise, so does the availability of plant nutrient ions (look at all the light green plants in the cool countries to the north forums) - same thing happens when oxygen levels rise - more nutrients become available.
2) It's the dog days of summer, time to feed but hot as hell. I might feed rather lightly in this scenario, then keep the soil rather to the moist end over this period as well.