There
Is
No
Wafer.
There is no wafer of CO2. Yes, they are lying. They are lying about the temperature in Death Valley surpassing all time records. They had to fraudulently invalidate the scientific record. They are liars and there is no wafer. Heat simply thins out the CO2. It rises up and then falls back down at a speed determined by the rate at which it cools.
I was looking at a candle last night. It was a tea light type of candle. they area around the wick was a pool of melted wax. In the wax were many tiny flecks of ash, either from my joint or from the burning wick of the candle. I noticed that the ashes were caught in a current in which they were drawn toward the wick and flame as the candle pulled the wax fuel up the column of the flame. As the ashes met the base of the wick the high heat and associated pressure blasted the ashes back away from the wick and this kept repeating over and over. The ash would rush toward the wick and then be repelled from the wick, only to rush right back to the wick, over and over again. It made me realize that this is a fairly good model for experimentation to show my CO2 understanding. The ash is repelled from a central radiant heat source and reaches it's pinnacle distance away from the candle's wick only to be drawn back through the current of wax fuel which is being vaporized and rising very rapidly through the candle's flame (a side note). The current of "wax pull" loosely approximates the force of gravity on a small particle (the ash nor CO2). And if the mainstream climate narrative about CO2 were true, then the ash particles movement should theoretically accelerate and the temperature of the wax would cease to be stable, it would rise.
The reason I bring up a grow room or grow tent is that the answer is "no, temps will not rise if you add CO2." This is not insignificant. I read about CO2 in Jorge Cervantez' books and I seem to recall reading, in his well cited books, of a study that he mentioned in which CO2 levels were measured over a corn field and, if I recall correctly, a corn field has roughly 50% less CO2 right above it than an acre of non planted earth. These books came out before the climate change narrative became mainstream. Also, Jorge's books talked about how CO2 is only usable by plants to a certain point and in order for the plant to absorb more CO2 or increase the rate of absorption, THE TEMPERATURE MUST BE RAISED HIGHER. This is very important for understanding climate change and CO2 on a global scale. The earth has the laws of thermodynamics and physics to protect against CO2 becoming hot, but it also has natural biological preventative measures as well. So, if the temps do rise for any reason the plants (think: amazon and evergreen tundra) can compensate on any excessive CO2 load (not saying CO2 would cause temps to rise).
The fact that "fighting climate change" means cutting and burning down the amazon so that we can grow biofuel which still combusts and creates CO2, is completely insane and just shows that the climate fraud pushers are outright grifting one of the biggest global grifts mankind has ever known.
There is no magical CO2 wafer in the sky and temps wont rise in your grow tent if you add CO2.
It has bupkis to do with CO2 raising temperatures. That is one of the dumbest hypotheses ever presented. Your thoughts do not address the co-mingling of gases in the upper atmosphere.
In effect, your first paragraphs are 'nanananana - I can't hear you'. They have nothing to do with what I stated.
It appears that you are so caught up in what you perceive as some scam presented by a fictitious enemy that you miss the true enemy and thoughtful consideration of the elements and their behavior.
BTW I have no idea what this is about; "The fact that "fighting climate change" means cutting and burning down the amazon so that we can grow biofuel which still combusts and creates CO2, is completely insane and just shows that the climate fraud pushers are outright grifting one of the biggest global grifts mankind has ever known."
Also BTW Jorge Cervantez????!!!!!!!