What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

The Great Awakening

Is the Great Awakening happening?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 39.0%

  • No

    Votes: 21 51.2%

  • Not Sure

    Votes: 4 9.8%
  • Total voters
    41
Microbeman

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Hempy McNoodle said:
Scientific debate, which is an essential part of science, is being done away with. It has been slowly replaced over the last 15 years or so with the term 'consensus', which is pretty much the opposite of science. Science exists to break through 'consensus'. Consensus would imply that science is a democratic process (which it is not). Also, 'scientific consensus' is easily manipulated by HR departments at any and all institutions. I've seen so many examples of dissenting scientists losing their jobs for going against the pseudo-scientific narratives.

And if a scientist debates a pseudo-scientist, the pseudo-scientist will predictably use and hide behind another pseudo-scientific tool, 'Occam's Razor.'
Click to expand...

[real] Debate between scientists is done by email, messaging; trading observations, photos, videos, conclusions, methods; most people are not privy to this. For example you do not know about my research into EM culturing, fungal pathogen suppression in plants and humans, dark septate endophytes and nutrient delivery but there are some scientists who do.

Some of this debate results in publications, some results in ongoing research at universities, farms, garages.
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Microbeman said:
[real] Debate between scientists is done by email, messaging; trading observations, photos, videos, conclusions, methods; most people are not privy to this. For example you do not know about my research into EM culturing, fungal pathogen suppression in plants and humans, dark septate endophytes and nutrient delivery but there are some scientists who do.

Some of this debate results in publications, some results in ongoing research at universities, farms, garages.
Click to expand...

People will have a hard time debating something if it is a 'private debate.' I am mainly talking about 'open debate' as opposed to pseudo-scientific 'Case Closed / majority has ruled' ideology.
 
Microbeman

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Hempy McNoodle said:
People will have a hard time debating something if it is a 'private debate.' I am mainly talking about 'open debate' as opposed to pseudo-scientific 'Case Closed / majority has ruled' ideology.
Click to expand...

so false show and tell you mean...not true debate...I am mainly talking....like letters from Einstein
 
Switcher56

Switcher56

Comfortably numb!
unclefishstick

unclefishstick

Fancy Janitor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Hempy McNoodle said:
Haha, shaggy come back!
Click to expand...


can't happen,if you and shaggy were online at the same time we would all be flung into the delta quadrant!


voyager-900x506.jpg
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
My Current Grow

My Current Grow

Just wanted to share my current grow. 3 Pakistani (Chitral) Kush from Ace on the left and on the right that is a Pre-98 Bubba Kush (Cali Connection), a Granddaddy Purple (Ken Estes), and the little one is a deformed Iraqi Pilgrim from Derg Corra Collective. They are in 25 gallon pots and I hope they aren't over crowded as thois was sort of a new experimental set up. I normally don't grow more than one plant per container. They are well branched so I hope they have room for buds. I mostly feed them worm tea. I also give them blood meal, bone meal, and wood ash. The lights are Optic 1XL LED COB lights.
I finally have fertilization down! The plants are much deeper green than the photos suggest.

What say you? Will I have enough room for buds with the spacing provided, after flowering starts?

 
armedoldhippy

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
unclefishstick said:
can't happen,if you and shaggy were online at the same time we would all be flung into the delta quadrant!


View Image
Click to expand...

if Hempshaggy had 2 computers sitting side by side & he/they typed on both simultaneously using both hands, would they both be wrong? could either of them be right? would the left hand have a clue what the right was up to? or would it open up a wormhole full of already disproven conspiracy theories that would kill & eat t/him?:ying:
 
G

Guest

WHAT?!

You've been drinking whiskey. It's obvious!

Galileo proves my original point? HUH?

I say: You raised Galileo's failure to convince the Church aka the Pope of the day (Il Papa giggle giggle chortle choke) and linked that to Science.

I think you thought, by bringing up Gal that you had made an irrefutable argument re Science.

But seems to me you just displayed a lack of UNDERSTANDING that you never previously could have until the invention of the PC and the Web. (Fuck the Web!)

And if this was the Middle Ages you would have me burned as a Wizard! (Or a Witch. I don't care ...)

Hempy McNoodle said:
I didn't know you were expecting a comment. I will say that in your comment, you seem to fail to see how Galileo proves your original point (that a single person wont likely undermine an entire consensus of the 'scientific' community) to be erroneous.
Click to expand...
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Sat X RB said:
WHAT?!

You've been drinking whiskey. It's obvious!

Galileo proves my original point? HUH?

I say: You raised Galileo's failure to convince the Church aka the Pope of the day (Il Papa giggle giggle chortle choke) and linked that to Science.

I think you thought, by bringing up Gal that you had made an irrefutable argument re Science.

But seems to me you just displayed a lack of UNDERSTANDING that you never previously could have until the invention of the PC and the Web. (Fuck the Web!)

And if this was the Middle Ages you would have me burned as a Wizard! (Or a Witch. I don't care ...)
Click to expand...

No. No. You've once again mischaracterized or misunderstood what I've said. And, you also seem unaware of multiple contradictions in things you've been saying.

Example: You just mischaracterized my reasoning for bringing up Galileo by saying that he"failed to convince the church." That is not why I mentioned Galileo, or 'Gal,' as you refer to him. I brought up Galileo's triumph over 'flat-earthers' who also thought that the earth was the center of the universe (or, what we now understand to be our solar system) and were essentially the 'scientific consensus of the time and place.
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle said:
That didn't take long...
Meanwhile, dems have full control of house, senate and executive branch. Why won't they help the struggling American people???

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-syria-strike-exclusive-int-idUSKBN2AP337
Click to expand...

I had a little more time to think about this one...

This is very interesting. My thinking is that Biden is not in control of the US military and thus can't order such an attack. A few days ago there was chatter about Russia accusing the US and ISIS of preparing to stage a new false-flag chemical weapons attack in Idlib Province. Normally, The Obama -Biden admin never struck Iranian Backed militias, that was Trump's military's tactic.

Word is that Kamala Harris is upset that she was not informed of the attack prior to the strike. Donald Trump Jr put out a message on social media asking if Biden was aware, either.

What I'm saying is that it is possible that the US military took out a Deep State target with Assad's permission and against the desires of the Biden admin, who has no say in the matter. Now, the admin has to answer tough questions about why it was wrong for Trump to strike in Syria, Iraq, and Iran, but fine for Joe Biden. And now all their old Tweets against Trump are being used against them exposing their hypocrisy. And the funny thing is that striking terrorists is the last thing they want to do. And they can't say anything about it because they can't let the people know that they have no authority over the military at this time.
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle said:
I had a little more time to think about this one...

This is very interesting. My thinking is that Biden is not in control of the US military and thus can't order such an attack. A few days ago there was chatter about Russia accusing the US and ISIS of preparing to stage a new false-flag chemical weapons attack in Idlib Province. Normally, The Obama -Biden admin never struck Iranian Backed militias, that was Trump's militarie's tactic.

Word is that Kamala Harris is upset that she was not informed of the attack prior to the strike. Donald Trump Jr put out a message on social media asking if Biden was aware, either.

What I'm saying is that it is possible that the US military took out a Deep State target with Assad's permission and against the desires of the Biden admin, who has no say in the matter. Now, the admin has to answer tough questions about why it was wrong for Trump to strike in Syria, Iraq, and Iran, but fine for Joe Biden. And now all their old Tweets against Trump are being used against them exposing their hypocrisy. And the funny thing is that striking terrorists is the last thing they want to do. And they can't say anything about it because they can't let the people know that they have no authority over the military at this time.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1365116665860657161

Donald Trump Jr.
@DonaldJTrumpJr
"Was Joe Biden informed?"
Quote Tweet
Jack Posobiec Flag of United States
@JackPosobiec
· Feb 25
"Kamala Harris was not informed prior to the Syrian bombing and is very upset about being left out of the loop, per WH official"
5:49 PM · Feb 25, 2021·
 
H

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle said:
I had a little more time to think about this one...

This is very interesting. My thinking is that Biden is not in control of the US military and thus can't order such an attack. A few days ago there was chatter about Russia accusing the US and ISIS of preparing to stage a new false-flag chemical weapons attack in Idlib Province. Normally, The Obama -Biden admin never struck Iranian Backed militias, that was Trump's militarie's tactic.

Word is that Kamala Harris is upset that she was not informed of the attack prior to the strike. Donald Trump Jr put out a message on social media asking if Biden was aware, either.

What I'm saying is that it is possible that the US military took out a Deep State target with Assad's permission and against the desires of the Biden admin, who has no say in the matter. Now, the admin has to answer tough questions about why it was wrong for Trump to strike in Syria, Iraq, and Iran, but fine for Joe Biden. And now all their old Tweets against Trump are being used against them exposing their hypocrisy. And the funny thing is that striking terrorists is the last thing they want to do. And they can't say anything about it because they can't let the people know that they have no authority over the military at this time.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/jrpsaki/status/850173258540474368


Jen Psaki
@jrpsaki
"Also what is the legal authority for strikes? Assad is a brutal dictator. But Syria is a sovereign country."
7:27 PM · Apr 6, 2017·
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top