What's new
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Great Awakening

Is the Great Awakening happening?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 39.0%
  • No

    Votes: 21 51.2%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 4 9.8%

  • Total voters
    41

audiohi

Well-known member
Veteran
Trump Commerce official was arrested in November on child pornography charges
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/05/trump-commerce-official-arrested-473906

According to the pretrial detention memo, Hageman’s phone “contained at least 33 videos that appear to contain sexually explicit depictions of children, including of prepubescent children.”

Hageman is the most recent political operative arrested on federal child pornography charges. In February, authorities arrested and charged Ruben Verastigui, a former Senate Republican staffer, with similar offenses.


"Only the best people"
 

Sunshineinabag

Active member
What-color-is-your-flow-800x800.png
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
Well in one of your posts you started out somewhat with reasoning but rapidly deteriorated into ramblings of 'clandestine weather modification operations'.

I am missing what CO2 in a grow room has to do with the subject.

Just as the carbon police cannot argue, a strict CO2 cause, neither can the nay sayers present baseless arguments against. Whether brought about by CO2 with CH4 or a gazillion other toxins, I form little doubt in my mind that it (accelerated climate change) is not a man made problem.

Gas mass quantification is relative to the density influenced spatially, electrically/magnetically, pressureally and temperaturally. These influences must be considered when estimating resting places of gases in earth's upper atmosphere. Additionally gases in the upper atmosphere (and elsewhere) can become mixed, taking on different and unique properties. Whatever their composition, it is fairly obvious there is a shield/barrier formed.

Unless they are lying I believe scientists report test results revealing the existence of CO2 in the upper atmosphere.

It sounds like you are aware that one cannot simply apply confined observations where 'size' and space is limited. [when forming a hypothesis regarding the collection of gases in the atmosphere]

The positioning of gases is influenced and relative to those attributes of surrounding gases as well as electrical, temperature and gravitational gradients.

Can we not then state that an enormous wafer-thin 'chunk' of CO2 floated to the heavens where it co-mingled with other gases forming the 6 mil plastic over the greenhouse?

An arguably unsuitable metaphor > concrete sinks in water; a concrete boat floats in water; cement mixes with water; a piece of a concrete ship at the ocean's bottom analyzed; yup it's concrete.

There
Is
No
Wafer.

There is no wafer of CO2. Yes, they are lying. They are lying about the temperature in Death Valley surpassing all time records. They had to fraudulently invalidate the scientific record. They are liars and there is no wafer. Heat simply thins out the CO2. It rises up and then falls back down at a speed determined by the rate at which it cools.


I was looking at a candle last night. It was a tea light type of candle. they area around the wick was a pool of melted wax. In the wax were many tiny flecks of ash, either from my joint or from the burning wick of the candle. I noticed that the ashes were caught in a current in which they were drawn toward the wick and flame as the candle pulled the wax fuel up the column of the flame. As the ashes met the base of the wick the high heat and associated pressure blasted the ashes back away from the wick and this kept repeating over and over. The ash would rush toward the wick and then be repelled from the wick, only to rush right back to the wick, over and over again. It made me realize that this is a fairly good model for experimentation to show my CO2 understanding. The ash is repelled from a central radiant heat source and reaches it's pinnacle distance away from the candle's wick only to be drawn back through the current of wax fuel which is being vaporized and rising very rapidly through the candle's flame (a side note). The current of "wax pull" loosely approximates the force of gravity on a small particle (the ash or CO2). And if the mainstream climate narrative about CO2 were true, then the ash particles movement should theoretically accelerate and the temperature of the wax would cease to be stable, it would rise.

The reason I bring up a grow room or grow tent is that the answer is "no, temps will not rise if you add CO2." This is not insignificant. I read about CO2 in Jorge Cervantez' books and I seem to recall reading, in his well cited books, of a study that he mentioned in which CO2 levels were measured over a corn field and, if I recall correctly, a corn field has roughly 50% less CO2 right above it than an acre of non planted earth. These books came out before the climate change narrative became mainstream. Also, Jorge's books talked about how CO2 is only usable by plants to a certain point and in order for the plant to absorb more CO2 or increase the rate of absorption, THE TEMPERATURE MUST BE RAISED HIGHER. This is very important for understanding climate change and CO2 on a global scale. The earth has the laws of thermodynamics and physics to protect against CO2 becoming hot, but it also has natural biological preventative measures as well. So, if the temps do rise for any reason the plants (think: amazon and evergreen tundra) can compensate on any excessive CO2 load (not saying CO2 would cause temps to rise).

The fact that "fighting climate change" means cutting and burning down the amazon so that we can grow biofuel which still combusts and creates CO2, is completely insane and just shows that the climate fraud pushers are outright grifting one of the biggest global grifts mankind has ever known.

There is no magical CO2 wafer in the sky and temps wont rise in your grow tent if you add CO2.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top