What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The 2020 Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.

med4u

Active member
Veteran
I think the evidence shows exactly what he did. And I think those witnesses would only prove it more. Think of them as part of the glue keeping the swamp from being drained.

What could shithead not want them to say under oath?

Oh I see...didnt Schiff subpoena all them cats in the investigation phase?
 
Last edited:

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
full of lies and exaggerations of his "accomplishments"

not to mention it doesn't even sound like he wrote it lol


Give me some examples. You guys are too easy! Please don't change the subject!



What do you disagree with in President Trump's letter to Pelosi December 17? :smoke:
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It was a perfect letter..


There are a lot of representatives and citizens including constitutional lawyers who agree. Surpreme court is looking to be a leverage point of the DEmocrats. If they can prevent the supreme court picks of an Impeached President Trump they have reduced the power of the Republican Government. :smoke:
 

audiohi

Well-known member
Veteran
pipeline style...

CHRISTIANITY TODAY

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/december-web-only/trump-should-be-removed-from-office.html

Trump Should Be Removed from Office

It’s time to say what we said 20 years ago when a president’s character was revealed for what it was.​

In our founding documents, Billy Graham explains that Christianity Today will help evangelical Christians interpret the news in a manner that reflects their faith. The impeachment of Donald Trump is a significant event in the story of our republic. It requires comment.

The typical CT approach is to stay above the fray and allow Christians with different political convictions to make their arguments in the public square, to encourage all to pursue justice according to their convictions and treat their political opposition as charitably as possible. We want CT to be a place that welcomes Christians from across the political spectrum, and reminds everyone that politics is not the end and purpose of our being. We take pride in the fact, for instance, that politics does not dominate our homepage.

That said, we do feel it necessary from time to time to make our own opinions on political matters clear—always, as Graham encouraged us, doing so with both conviction and love. We love and pray for our president, as we love and pray for leaders (as well as ordinary citizens) on both sides of the political aisle.

Let’s grant this to the president: The Democrats have had it out for him from day one, and therefore nearly everything they do is under a cloud of partisan suspicion. This has led many to suspect not only motives but facts in these recent impeachment hearings. And, no, Mr. Trump did not have a serious opportunity to offer his side of the story in the House hearings on impeachment.

But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.

Trump’s evangelical supporters have pointed to his Supreme Court nominees, his defense of religious liberty, and his stewardship of the economy, among other things, as achievements that justify their support of the president. We believe the impeachment hearings have made it absolutely clear, in a way the Mueller investigation did not, that President Trump has abused his authority for personal gain and betrayed his constitutional oath. The impeachment hearings have illuminated the president’s moral deficiencies for all to see. This damages the institution of the presidency, damages the reputation of our country, and damages both the spirit and the future of our people. None of the president’s positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such grossly immoral character.

This concern for the character of our national leader is not new in CT. In 1998, we wrote this:

The President's failure to tell the truth—even when cornered—rips at the fabric of the nation. This is not a private affair. For above all, social intercourse is built on a presumption of trust: trust that the milk your grocer sells you is wholesome and pure; trust that the money you put in your bank can be taken out of the bank; trust that your babysitter, firefighters, clergy, and ambulance drivers will all do their best. And while politicians are notorious for breaking campaign promises, while in office they have a fundamental obligation to uphold our trust in them and to live by the law.

And this:

Unsavory dealings and immoral acts by the President and those close to him have rendered this administration morally unable to lead.

Unfortunately, the words that we applied to Mr. Clinton 20 years ago apply almost perfectly to our current president. Whether Mr. Trump should be removed from office by the Senate or by popular vote next election—that is a matter of prudential judgment. That he should be removed, we believe, is not a matter of partisan loyalties but loyalty to the Creator of the Ten Commandments.

To the many evangelicals who continue to support Mr. Trump in spite of his blackened moral record, we might say this: Remember who you are and whom you serve. Consider how your justification of Mr. Trump influences your witness to your Lord and Savior. Consider what an unbelieving world will say if you continue to brush off Mr. Trump’s immoral words and behavior in the cause of political expediency. If we don’t reverse course now, will anyone take anything we say about justice and righteousness with any seriousness for decades to come? Can we say with a straight face that abortion is a great evil that cannot be tolerated and, with the same straight face, say that the bent and broken character of our nation’s leader doesn’t really matter in the end?

We have reserved judgment on Mr. Trump for years now. Some have criticized us for our reserve. But when it comes to condemning the behavior of another, patient charity must come first. So we have done our best to give evangelical Trump supporters their due, to try to understand their point of view, to see the prudential nature of so many political decisions they have made regarding Mr. Trump. To use an old cliché, it’s time to call a spade a spade, to say that no matter how many hands we win in this political poker game, we are playing with a stacked deck of gross immorality and ethical incompetence. And just when we think it’s time to push all our chips to the center of the table, that’s when the whole game will come crashing down. It will crash down on the reputation of evangelical religion and on the world’s understanding of the gospel. And it will come crashing down on a nation of men and women whose welfare is also our concern.

Mark Galli is editor in chief of Christianity Today.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran


Not much there to go off of. Thanks for sharing! What do you think about the statements made about the lack of due process in the prosecution. Pelosi and the Democrats created special "trial rules" for this impeachment. They did not follow the criteria of a fair criminal court!!!!:smoke:




Please read this again!


picture.php



picture.php
 

med4u

Active member
Veteran
There are a lot of representatives and citizens including constitutional lawyers who agree. Surpreme court is looking to be a leverage point of the DEmocrats. If they can prevent the supreme court picks of an Impeached President Trump they have reduced the power of the Republican Government. :smoke:

I wouldn't sweat it...hes still the prez doin all the prez shit...nothin new here...the executive branch does not
Serve at the pleasure of the legislative branch...if they dont like it they should have him removed in a senate trial...but apparently they dont feel to confident bout all that
:tiphat:
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I wouldn't sweat it...hes still the prez doin all the prez shit...nothin new here...the executive branch does not
W
Serve at the pleasure of the legislative branch...if they dont like it they should have him removed in a senate trial...but apparently they dont feel to confident bout all that
:tiphat:


Its time to start sweating. Listen to Mitch McConnell. I posted it earlier! :smoke:
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tml?ns_mchannel=rss&ito=1490&ns_campaign=1490


Mitch McConnell threatens to CANCEL Donald Trump's Senate trial if 'scared' Nancy Pelosi does not hand over 'slapdash' articles of impeachment - as Speaker slams him as a 'ROGUE leader' and president gloats he will be cleared by 'default'


  • Nancy Pelosi forced the Trump impeachment across the finish line Wednesday
  • Now the process moves to a U.S. Senate trial but Pelosi said she's in no hurry
  • She blasted Senate leader Mitch McConnell for saying he's not an 'impartial' juror, and declared she won't hand him the baton without a pledge of 'fairness'
  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing for witness subpoenas that Republicans don't want to agree to
  • Impeachment trial can't start until Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy choose 'managers' to carry the House's case to the Senate
  • McConnell slammed Pelosi in a floor speech and warned the Senate's more patient pace will have a 'calming' influence after 'slapdash' impeachment
  • President Donald Trump warned that '[t]he Do Nothing Party want to Do Nothing with the Articles & not deliver them to the Senate, but it's Senate's call!'
By David Martosko, U.S. Political Editor and Emily Goodin, Senior U.s. Political Reporter For Dailymail.com
Published: 08:08 EST, 19 December 2019 | Updated: 13:04 EST, 19 December 2019

  • e-mail
3.5k shares
3.4k
View comments

Mitch McConnell threatened on Thursday to cancel Donald Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate if 'scared' Nancy Pelosi refuses to send him the formal articles of impeachment that Democrats passed Wednesday night.
The Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority leader went to war over next steps in the impeachment process, with Pelosi slamming McConnell as a 'rogue leader'⁠—and he blasted her indictment of the president as 'slapdash' and 'unfair.'
The dispute exploded into the open the morning after Democrats voted to impeach Trump, with the president bragging he coulld prevaIl by 'default.'
'If the Do Nothing Democrats decide, in their great wisdom, not to show up, they would lose by Default!,' Trump argued on Twitter of his upcoming Senate trial, which is now in doubt.
Pelosi has to transmit the articles of impeachment and appoint 'managers' to prosecute the president. She offered no timeline, saying she wanted to see the Senate's plan for a 'fair trial,' effectively holding the articles over McConnell's and Trump's heads.
McConnell, who previously said he wanted to hold a trial in January, responded: 'It's beyond me how the Speaker and Democratic Leader in the Senate think withholding the articles of impeachment and not sending them over gives them leverage.'
'Frankly, I'm not anxious to have the trial. If she thinks her case is so weak she doesn't want to send it over, throw me into that briar patch.'
View Image+9



Open warfare: Nancy Pelosi slammed Mitch McConnell as a 'rogue leader' and he called her articles of impeachment 'slapdash' and 'unfair' as the two clashed over the Senate trial of Donald Trump







View Image+9





+9




Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell claimed in a floor speech that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is afraid to send him the articles of impeachment that House Democrats passed Wednesday night

He and the president both blasted Pelosi for refusing to move to the next step, with Trump unleashing a storm of tweets and retweets and venting: 'PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT.'
McConnell also criticized Democrats on the Senate floor, accusing them of creating what he called an 'unfair, unfinished product'—Tcharges rump that stemmed from 'partisan rage.'
Calling Pelosi's work 'constitutionally incoherent,' he said impeaching a president on the basis of political disagreements would 'invite an endless parade of impeachable trials' in the future, making House leaders 'free to toss up a jump-ball every time they feel angry.'
'She's failed the country,' McConnell said.
'It was like the speaker called up Chairman [Jerrold] Nadler and ordered up "One impeachment, rushed delivery, please".'

+9



Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate minority leader accused McConnell of offering no defense of Trump's actions


+9



President Donald Trump held a rally as House Democrats were passing the articles, sticking to his guns and mocking them

Pelosi herself held a press conference after McConnell spoke and offered no hint on when she would move.
'Just to get this off the table right away, we impeached the president immediately and everybody was on to the next thing,' she said.
'The next thing will be when we see the process that is set forth in the Senate. Then we'll know the number of managers that we may have to go forward and who we would choose.'
And she grew testy as reporters pressed her for more details on when the two articles of impeachment will end up on McConnell's desk.
'I'm not going to answer anymore questions on this. Clearly you understand when we see what their process is we will know who and how many we want to send over, not until then. I'm not going to go there anymore,' Pelosi said.
Our founders, when they wrote the constitution, they suspected that there could be a rogue president. I don't think they suspected that we could have a rogue president and a rogue leader in the Senate at the same time.
Nancy Pelosi


But she did react angrily to McConnell's speech, saying: 'I saw some - I didn't see it - but heard some of what Mitch McMconnell said today and it reminded me that our founders, when they wrote the constitution, they suspected that there could be a rogue president.
' I don't think they suspected that we could have a rogue president and a rogue leader in the Senate at the same time.'
In the Senate, McConnell declared that 'their slapdash process has concluded in the first purely partisan presidential impeachment since the wake of the Civil War.'
Citing previous House votes that fell short of authorizing impeachment inquiries, he said Democrats had 'tried to impeach President Trump for being impolite to the press, for being mean to professional athletes, for changing President Obama's policy on transgender people in the military.'
'All of these things were high crimes and misdemeanors according to the Democrats,' he said.
McConnell cited Democrats' earlier pledges to impeach Trump as proof that Wednesday's vote 'was not some neutral judgment that Democrats came to with great reluctance. It was the predetermined end of a partisan crusade that began before President Trump was even nominated, let alone sworn in.'
House Democrats have begun pressing Pelosi to force the Senate to tailor the upcoming constitutional trial to their wishes—by refusing to send the articles of impeachment to McConnell until he agrees to their terms.
Frankly, I'm not anxious to have the trial. If she thinks her case is so weak she doesn't want to send it over, throw me into that briar patch
Mitch McConnell


McConnell called her bluff, saying she's afraid to hand him the baton because she knows the articles are weak.
'Pelosi suggested that House Democrats may be too afraid to even transmit their shoddy work product to the Senate,' he will say, mocking her suggestion in a post-vote press conference that she'll hold the two articles over his head until he agrees to a 'fair' trial.
In response Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate minority leader accused McConnell of offering no defense of Trump's actions.
He renewed his call for witnesses at the trial saying: 'Is the president's case so weak that none of the President's men can defend him under oath?'
And echoing McConnell's criticism of 'the most rushed, least thorough, and most unfair impeachment inquiry in modern history,' Schumer said the Republicans were 'plotting the most rushed, least thorough, and most unfair impeachment trial.
A defiant Trump partially quoted the Senate's rules for impeaching President Andrew Johnson in 1868, saying in a tweet that '[t]he Senate shall set the time and place of the trial.'
'The Do Nothing Party want to Do Nothing with the Articles & not deliver them to the Senate, but it's Senate's call!' he warned, saying they would 'lose by default' if they decided to ignore whatever schedule McConnell sets.
'PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT!' Trump tweeted in a standalone message
View Image+9




View Image



View Image








Schumer this week demanded McConnell agree to swear in a list of trial witnesses that include senior Trump administration officials and Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, people who House Democrats decided not to subpoena during their impeachment inquiry.
McConnell said Schumer has been 'searching for ways the Senate could step out of our proper role and try to fix House Democrats' failures for them.'
George Washington is said to have told Thomas Jefferson that the U.S. Senate was designed to be a calming counterpoint to the more raucous House of Representatives, in the way a teacup's saucer 'cools' a hot beverage.
McConnell, famous for embracing a plodding style when key legislation is on his desk, leaned on the oft-quoted 'cooling saucer of democracy'—saying that the U.S. Constitution's framers 'built the Senate to provide stability' and '[t]o keep partisan passions from boiling over. Moments like this are why the United States Senate exists.'
Pelosi told reporters after adjourning the House of Representatives on Wednesday night that she's in no hurry to send the two articles of impeachment to McConnell for a trial. Her caucus passed them without any Republican votes, accusing Trump of abusing his power and showing open contempt for Democrats' investigation by blocking witnesses and document demands.

+9



The Articles of Impeachment were approved Wednesday night with no Republican votes; Rep. Tulsi Gabbard voted 'present' instead of 'yes,' and two other Democrats bucked Pelosi to openly side with the GOP

The Republican-led Senate owns the next chapter of thesaga, a trial where Chief Justice John Roberts will preside. An unlikely two-thirds supermajority is required to convict the president and remove him from office.
McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, expects his Republican majority to exonerate Trump. But that can't happen until impeachment 'managers,' duos chosen by both parties, present the Senate with the twin impeachment articles.
Pelosi said Wednesday night that she won't be ready to let go of the process until McConnell demonstrates the trial will be 'fair'—and she's nowhere near convinced yet.
The Washington Post quoted Oregon Democratic Rep. Earl Blumenauer overnight saying he has talked to three dozen Democratic lawmakers who favor 'rounding out the record and spending the time to do this right.'
'At a minimum, there ought to be an agreement about access to witnesses, rules of the game, timing,' Blumenauer said of the upcoming Senate trial.
And an unnamed Democrat told the newspaper that Democrats are discussing 'serious concern about whether there will be a fair trial on the Senate side.'
Impeachment managers are appointed via House resolutions; Thursday is the last day the House will be in session until January 7.

+9



Trump vented about his political plight at a political rally in Michigan while House Democrats were voting to impeach him in Washington






'We have legislation approved by the Rules Committee that will enable us to decide how we send over the articles of impeachment,' Pelosi said. 'We cannot name managers until we see what the process is on the Senate side.'
'So far we haven't seen anything that looks fair to us,' she warned. 'So hopefully it will be fairer. And when see what that is, we'll send our managers.'
'Let me tell you what I don't consider a fair trial,' Pelosi said as she read from a piece of paper an aide handed her.
'This is what I don't consider a fair trial, that Leader McConnell has stated that he's not an impartial juror, that he's going to take his 'cues' from the White House, and he is working in total coordination with the White House counsel's office.'


Here ya go! There is a lot going on right now, but we need to address this impeachment scam! This has to stop! We don't want impeachment with special "trial rules" to be regular business where it could be used as a political tool to disrupt power of the other party in the future. :smoke:
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran


The electoral college system is not in question. Its staying put. Thats part of the design of our republic. Its what makes a republic different from a democracy. America is a republic form of government to prevent issues that always occur in pure democracy governments.



What else do you have? :smoke:
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
The electoral college system is not in question. Its staying put. Thats part of the design of our republic. Its what makes a republic different from a democracy. America is a republic form of government to prevent issues that always occur in pure democracy governments.



What else do you have? :smoke:
give us some examples of pure democracy governments
and the issues that always occur
 

Ichabod Crane

Well-known member
Veteran
So the dems say it is to important to wait for the supreme court to rule if the president must give up executive privilege. They say he is a threat to the 2020 election and the nation. So they rush impeachment threw and say there is no time to wait on the Supreme Court to rule. Then they charge him with the made up crime of obstruction of congress because they would not wait on the Supreme Court.

And now we wait. Wouldn't it have been better to just wait for the Supreme Court. Not if this is all political which it is.
 

med4u

Active member
Veteran
Chill bro...the Senate makes all the rules...mitch can call all exculpatory witnesses if he wants..and not let them call even one
Once the articles of impeachment are delivered to senate...the house has not one word to say about the rules in the senate... not even one
Dont know why folks are having a problem with this...but that's the way she goes...chucky can say what he wants...but he is the minority leader and holds no weight in the Senate
This dilemma arises from the apeachment not being partisan
In a real inpeachment the crime or offense is so grievous that both dem and repub want to remove the prez and both would work together to indict. ..since this is divided along partisan lines...its dem vs repub and the repubs hold the senate... the final and sole deciders of the trial rules and jurors....remember not a criminal trial or rules
The house is responsible to deliver all the charges and witnesses already done in the articles...if they do a shit job with that..its to bad
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Chill bro...the Senate makes all the rules...mitch can call all exculpatory witnesses if he wants..and not let them call even one
Once the articles of impeachment are delivered to senate...the house has not one word to say about the rules in the senate... not even one
Dont know why folks are having a problem with this...but that's the way she goes...chucky can say what he wants...but he is the minority leader and holds no weight in the Senate
This dilemma arises from the apeachment not being partisan
In a real inpeachment the crime or offense is so grievous that both dem and repub want to remove the prez and both would work together to indict. ..since this is divided along partisan lines...its dem vs repub and the repubs hold the senate... the final and sole deciders of the trial rules and jurors....remember not a criminal trial or rules
The house is responsible to deliver all the charges and witnesses already done in the articles...if they do a shit job with that..its to bad


We have to stay vigilant. We have to stay engaged in the battle for freedom and liberty. There are A LOT of people who want to take your liberty and freedom away. :smoke:
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
give us some examples of pure democracy governments
and the issues that always occur


Look up founding fathers of America writings. Bad ticket said I can't post links, so if I post something it needs to matter. You can do your own research into history! Go! :smoke:
 

Ichabod Crane

Well-known member
Veteran
Chill bro...the Senate makes all the rules...mitch can call all exculpatory witnesses if he wants..and not let them call even one
Once the articles of impeachment are delivered to senate...the house has not one word to say about the rules in the senate... not even one
Dont know why folks are having a problem with this...but that's the way she goes...chucky can say what he wants...but he is the minority leader and holds no weight in the Senate
This dilemma arises from the apeachment not being partisan
In a real inpeachment the crime or offense is so grievous that both dem and repub want to remove the prez and both would work together to indict. ..since this is divided along partisan lines...its dem vs repub and the repubs hold the senate... the final and sole deciders of the trial rules and jurors....remember not a criminal trial or rules
The house is responsible to deliver all the charges and witnesses already done in the articles...if they do a shit job with that..its to bad

I am not stressed at all. Just pointing out how weak the dems argument is. It changes with the wind. When something don't work they make up something else. It has been a impeachment fight since before he won the election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top