ledo
Chasing the Present
malformed crinkled leaves & stunted growth are NOT A MUTATION just a weird looking plant often due insect damage, and that's my entire point. The word mutation is being used freely, often and to describe things that are not in fact mutations. True mutations are extremely rare in both plants and animalsNah ,,,
It`s a lot more common than that .
Old seeds seem to have more variations . But malformed crinkled leaves and stunted growth comes out a lot more often than 1 in 1 billion . I have seen it several times within a few thousand plants .
A mutation is a change in the DNA sequence of an organism, Elmer seeing malformed or crinkled leafs equals a mutation how...?
not trying to argue with you either brother, just a good conversation where we disagree on some things. Adaptation is not mutation, it's slow evolution, sometimes evolution is dramatically expedited by Mutations but adaptation happens often and constantly without any mutations at all.it seems that a species would have a difficult time adapting to environmental changes if the gene mutation rate required so many individuals. Plant species manage to adapt to unique island environments with very small founder population sizes. Far far less then a billion individuals.
"Comparing the genomes of plant and animal species is common scientific practice now, but the research team took this a stage further by studying all the genetic changes in five varieties of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana (commonly known as mouse ear cress) over 30 generations. Their goal was to identify the differences between the genome of the final generation and the genome of the first generation. The research found that over several years 20 DNA building blocks (also called base pairs) had mutated in each of the 5 varieties of Arabidopsis.
This means in effect that each Arabidopsis seedling has, on average, one new mutation in each of the two new copies of the genome that it inherits from its parents.
The research made clear to the team just how changeable genomes are. Although the number of mutations in the Arabidopsis plants seemed small, when considering that the plant produces thousands of seeds in one generation, the speed of the mutations seems remarkable."
![]()
Research reveals rapid mutation rate of plant genomes
New research published in the journal Science describes how a research team studied the entire genome sequence of a plant over 30...cordis.europa.eu
am i misunderstanding?
peace
Sounds like Mouse ear cress is remarkable in the plant world, even the article states this above; this is remarkable (extraordinary by definition) vs what most animals and plants actually experience mutation rates at on average. I've read so many articles on this it's exhausting, the point is mutations in plants and animals is extremely rare, like winning the lottery and some growers think they have mutations every 20 plants they pop, it's ridiculous. Again my original point was simply that the word is used constantly to describe things that have nothing to do with changes at the DNA base level and it's sequencing, and certainly the ones tossing around mutations are not having their plants sequenced to prove such, it's Bro science at it's worst!
You mix the 3% hydrogen peroxide with RO or distilled water, the hydrogen peroxide breaks down to h20.
I only used GA once and I ordered that pre-made from Israel and I only saw one seedling start to grow a little lanky, but it grew out of that early.
Old seed, no matter how they're store over time, lose all the hormones and enzymes stored in the embryo sack and dry up that's a big reason for older seed not germinating the GA replaces that and that's why it works well.
Hempy, you take the 3% H202 and mix with water to make a solution of 1% H202, I think that point was clearly inferred unless you know a place we all can purchase 1% H202...?
Old seed requires two primary key things for preservation: vacuum seal & stable cool / cold temps... Far too many fail to vacuum seal their stuff and that's the root cause of expedited degradation outside of nature running her course.
Great hearing from you brother, I do hope you've been well and in good health. I'm pleasantly surprised to be hearing this, may you and your partners have wild success in reviving some of that old gear, God knows it's not easy work and work that often goes unnoticed and un-appreciated, we appreciate you brother ElChichas - much love man ! In good & happy healthHi brethen
Hola @funkyhorse , yes brother, me and other great Friends are trying to get back the mitic "Thai 82" from greenhornet seeds.
I don't really like to comment on what I'm doing
until things are a reality.
I've always been that way since I started on the forums, more than 20 years ago. I don't like to comment or write much. Most of what is discussed seems like a waste of time, in my humble opinion, and I say this without meaning to offend anyone. I prefer to simply focus on objectives.
I truly love growing marijuana, and that's the only thing that interests me.
We have an ambitious project to revive many old genetics. Right now, we're working on Thai 82, Malawi Gold, and Vietnam Tourist, all from Greenhornet seeds. Also, many more very old Landraces, including many seeds saved from the 1960s.
It's not easy. For me, it's required a huge effort to keep moving to acquire rare genetics. All these years, including trips to high-risk areas in my country to acquire the last remaining strains of the legendary Mexican sativas, which is why I don't have much time for idle discussions.
Since it seems like real Thai strains are almost impossible to find, I've decided to create my own Thai version. I already have some very interesting genetics, so perhaps in the future we can offer something interesting to the community.
@ledo brother, I hadn't mentioned anything before because it was supposed to be a surprise.
But yes, brother, we're working with this old Thai strain ,hoping everything goes well.
You know, you'll be one of the first to receive seeds.
see all that leaf, more leaf and then a bit more leaf..... Nobody hates trimming more than I, nobody !Thank you for taking your time to share knowledge
In the whorled phillotaxy plants I got from the progeny I made they never grew out of it, the plant made until maturity 3 branches per node with very poor productivity. And the whorled phillotaxy I got from other sources it was always the lowest productivity plant not giving any special or stronger high than normal sisters
What you comment is exactly my experience with the only fasciated plant I got
Thunk sold by Breeders Retail was not clear if it was made in the 90s or early 2000s
I got about 25% germination from the 20 seeds I tried
This is the only flower the fasciated Thunk made. The rest pure leaf
Very beautiful to see but I dont high from looks, I get high from bud and this thing doesnt produce any bud
View attachment 19172962 View attachment 19172963 View attachment 19172964 View attachment 19172965
Good luck to everyone trying to revive those old gems
Part of my selection criteria on plants is choosing for very good to excellent Flower:Leaf ratio and also leaf abscission, Sativas are so special and friendly they even shed them for ya.
Much love brother Funky, I appreciate and respect your truth crusade, far too many people pleasers in the world today, few whom tell it like it is and have experience to back it up
Last edited: