I stand corrected i just didnt see any other types while i was there, and there was a big assorment. O well for the time being im not dissapointed, i just needed some and found the quick fix.
were did u read this fista?I don't like the sound of the cowboy brand having ply in it. Those glues and treatment agents are toxic nasty crap. Probably a mistake but I would check them out if they char plywood the other wood is likely full of cadmium arsenic and other highly undesirable rubbish.
.
from http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag6.htm#otherinfoThe following comes from an email (posted on The BBQ Forum) from Cowboy Charcoal customer service regarding the use of scrap lumber in their lump. Personally, we don't object to the use of scrap lumber to make lump. We don't prefer it either. Whatever your opinion might be, we thought you would be interested in this additional information:
"As always, we stand by that we have only 100% natural hardwood charcoal made from oak, maple and hickory woods.
The wood that we use comes from the lumber industry in Kentucky. However, I assure you that none of it has been treated or has any chemicals on it. Much of the wood that we aquire (sic) is conserved from the kiln dried lumber industry. Much of this product is further processed into tounge (sic) and groove flooring material. Most of our raw material stream comes from the process before it is routed. However, occasionally a piece is rejected after it grooved and joins our raw material stream. Some flooring manufacturers are now prevarnishing their product. However, none of the mills that we resource (sic) from offer this product and no varish (sic) is used in their proccesses. I hope this helps reasure you! Please sontact us if you have any other questions!"
I have not read this entire thread, but was discussing it with CC (to whom I am indebted for teaching me about soil among other things). After reading the first few pages and the last couple, I was wondering if anyone had considered if the black soil described with the broken pieces of pottery seemed to have more than simply a terra petra (charcoal) but that the broken pottery could potentially be an excellent breeding ground for microbes (like pumice) and that the blackness of the soil could have included some form(s) of Humic Acid. Anyone got any leads or links as to the validity of this train of thought?
Hrm,
I think my point was missed. As far as the charcoal goes, anything with glues or heavy metals (PT lumber) should be avoided for obvious reasons. Is this thread about terra petra or adding charcoal (or where they overlap)? The point I was trying to make was that we are probably missing something (per the description of the specific terra petra) that the makers of the terra petra either knew (scientifically) or happened across and noticed a benefit. There are countless forms of charcoal and obviously it is valid to discuss the potential benefits of using charcoal soil. I was trying to ask if anyone had looked in to the other parts of the old soil from the Amazon Basin or could point me in a direction of someone who had done a scientific (or pseudo-scientific) study on what else was in the soil (aside from charcoal).
If anyone can point me in the right direction I would appreciate it.
X