Why is it gold has value? It doesn't have a whole lot of practical applications because it's too soft and while it's great for conductivity in electronics it's too scarce and too expensive to obtain to be practical for widespread use in electronics. I mean it is true that it has this long history as being a valuable possession as has been pointed out but why? Because it's shiney and pretty? What would worry me if I were to stockpile gold is that it might not end up being what the next currency is built on. For now it's pretty safe because everyone knows of gold's historical value but we're in strange times now. The say the economy is slowly improving but for the vast majority of folks it hardly feels like it and over the past few years people have been selling thier gold left and right and as tight as most people's budgets have been they haven't been buying it as much. So what happens if because of that people kind of start to forget about gold?
I know what I'm suggesting is pretty farfetched but still can anyone give me a better reason for gold's value other then because it's always been prized and/or it's shiney and pretty?
Currency regimes come and go constantly throughout history. Over a long enough time period the math always fails.Rejecting fractional reserve might have something to do with not accepting particulars of it. Not accepting as in ideology rather than application. When math, statistics and history tell a particular story, ideology has fundamental discretion even where application says otherwise.
The Government is drawing up plans for emergency immigration controls to curb an influx of Greeks and other European Union residents if the euro collapses, the Home Secretary discloses today.
Currency regimes come and go constantly throughout history. Over a long enough time period the math always fails.
How does it ruin its strength while in demand? Wouldn't the more people looking to purchase a limited supply of something create strength?
What do digital dollars add to the "real economy"
Maybe we should have a king
Just because you throw around disparaging remarks does not make your point.
You see bom. I could call you a dirty kunt. But that would not mean you have an asshole on your chin,breath that smells like a fish boat and ears that look like legs.
You have said goodbye to this thread several times yet continue to post.
I realize someone convinced you that it was your job to reeducate us poor idiots.
The problem is you have no basis for your ramblings other than emotionality.
History son
History is on our side.
Not 50 years of bullshit but thousands of years of history.
You are in the wrong sandbox. You should be in the other one with corky
you wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face.you dislike my delivery of facts, that's all.
still, I've proven that investing in gold simply creates more inflation, since it does not produce any sort of good or service that benfits society, so it does not qualify as part of the real-economy.
moreover, I've given examples of the most best investors in the world that will not touch gold, and their reasons are simply what I have explained.
to top it off, all the crowd of "gold is the best" that we have here, are the same who rant against so-called 1% for investing in imaginary-stock; when they themselves do the same.
gold = hype and speculation.
gold = not a producer of any real goods and services that benefit society.
if you disagree, all you need to do is to prove how gold and investing in it gives back to society anything but inflation.
and btw, digital dollars is what is produced by investing in gold, since as already said 10 times at least, it does not produce anything pragmatic. which is essentially what causes the need to print paper-money, to try to honour the speculation that trading gold actually yields real dollars.
and I'd rather sit in the sandbox with corky, than with you; at least corky is honest
whodare, last time I checked, garimpeiros, amazon destruction and child-slavery were not considered beneficial to society.
maybe in bizarre-world that's neat?
whodare, last time I checked, garimpeiros, amazon destruction and child-slavery were not considered beneficial to society.
maybe in bizarre-world that's neat?
hmm i give you a ton of substance to respond to and all you come up with is child slavery and forest destruction.
the business not the gold makes those decisions, and with the conservation movement in full swing miners are becoming more environmentally and socially cognizant.
by the way child labor is not child slavery...
just because they get payed shit by your standards doesn't mean it's not leaving them in a better position then they were before, ya know likely living in a tree fort, short on food cause they are still small time farmers and big time hunter gatherers...
ever think their lives may be improved by their standards. maybe thats why they take the dollar a day over starving, hoping dad can bring some meat home out of the woods...
Gold speculation is the reason that central banks are forced to create digital dollars?!?!?!
You cant by fucking serious?