Thanks Guys. Great discussion You've made happen.
One thing. Whether Mitten-Way, Socal, Holland, NY or Mendocino. There is a top eschelon regarding people who actually study, learn and know strains. The percentage goes from 5% to about 20 for CA, IMHO.
There will be room for the best stuff, just gotta find afficianadoes who appreciate it and can afford to pay for it.
No other way to run this biz than depend on yourself and take the bull by the horns.
Exactly, every level of product has a market, you just have to make it happen.
Your photos always look killer, props on your skills.
The first part I absolutely agree with. The future will require that all products that come to market be regulated, tracked, taxed, etc...
It's the second part that I'm concerned about. If you're not vending your product or only vending a very small amount, then you should be able to grow as much as you like. It's these 4-12 plant limits that rub me the wrong way. I understand that if there's not limits then people can be diverting product to the black market, but is that a strong enough reason to keep you from growing 200 seeds in your back yard or basement? If I want to have a 20 lighter or greenhouse, that should be my choice.
It's much easier for the government to say you can only grow "x" number of plants, than to try to catch people diverting product to the black market. So that's what I think they'll do. It may take years to fight in the courts for the right to grow as much as you please as long as you're not vending it without the proper licenses etc...
I wasn't saying I agree, it is just something that will be an issue for profitable growers in a legal or taxable medical market.
I agree that we should be able to start as many seeds as we would like in a legal atmosphere but it isn't realistic yet. They only constant in our world is the plant count, everything other aspect of growing has too many variables to control from the states perspective. Plant count is simple for the average joe to keep track of and easier for an officer to count if the need arises.
Another realistic question...
How many patients could you as a caregiver realistically support and stay in the plant count numbers already in the law? Why aren't we fighting to gain a larger number of patients and keep plant counts the same?
I can see where this would benefit both sides of the coin. Caregivers are able to gain revenue and keep meds in the system. The state would have a lower plant/patient ratio which you would think would make the MSP and Schuette happy.. Collective Bargaining?
Peace!
Last edited: