Shmavis
Being-in-the-world
...Oregan, cali, Colorado are looking more and more promising every day.
I have thought for many years that I’d like to head to the PNW, the current status of cannabis there would just be a big bonus.
DT, you don’t mention Washington. Any reason you’d choose Oregon over Washington? I’m not up on how things are being handled in either State. I wonder if one has the advantage over the other...
Really enjoy talking about this stuff, thanks Shmavis! You don't sound like a dick at all, I hope I didn't come across as one either!
(I have a shit load going on at the moment so if something doesn't quite make sense, I am sorry! Satori is trying to straighten me out.)
Peace
GC
I enjoy it too. And no, no percievning of dicky-ness happening here (you have nothing to apologize for)
Now, let's see...
I agree that product dictates the price. It just seems that the base price of our product has been inflated due to prohibition. What is the profit margin on selling at high-end prices? This isn't like the auto industry where "better" quality parts and gadgets dictate a higher price. One grower could have $7 per gram into production costs, and another have $2. If the end product was identical, the grower with the higher cost goes under. Shitty for them, better for all other parties.
This strikes me as one fella (or woman) having better business sense than the other ($2 vs $7). Or a start-up versus an established operator. At any rate, a moot point if it’s competition who’s cut out. (No, this shouldn’t be about competition, but the unfortunate truth is that it is). As to profit margin, let’s say (yep, I’m speaking in hypotheticals ) that you sell an ounce to a dispensary for $300. Let’s further assume that it's then sold for $20 a gram, a price regularly seen... that seems to me to be a respectable return on investment. And to maintain profit margins they’ll most likely take more of a profit here, less of one there. Perhaps they sell something special only in grams to ensure their return. Anyway, I think $300 allows for ‘em to still do quite well.
I agree, that was hypothetical. I was coming from the side of after legalization, I shouldn't be. Although, if your operating within the law, those worries and non-sense shouldn't exist. We all know how to stop the idiots in charge, I.e. Schutte.
Yes, being compliant should remove one’s worries. But I fear that anyone accepting this as status quo does their self a great disservice. I’m worried that few (Edit:*many*) of the folks out there in this venture are not keeping apprised of current attempts to trample the MMMA. (not necessarily those replying herein). A quick example: do you know that caregivers are being denied an affirmative defense as registered caregivers for not knowing the qualifying condition of their patients? Do you know your patients’? If a patient provides proof of being a currently registered qualifying patient, then what business is it of mine (or anyone else’s outside their physician) as to what their qualifying condition is? This strikes me as an important privacy matter.
Let’s say you’re a full-blown caregiver with 72 plants. How’s it going to go if the worst case scenario finds you in court without being able to introduce your caregiver status as a defense? Being compliant —in the eyes of the law — is actually a very tricky thing. Also, do you know that not too long ago Schutte leaned on the State to hand over all the names (incidentally addresses as well) of registered caregivers? TheMan13 makes some good points about many forces at play here, but at the end of the day the AG is the top law-dog. He has a hard-on for caregivers. And none of us are operating within the greater superseding law of the Federal government...
Why isn't it? I have more risk of failure and loss in my "real" business than I do in being a caregiver. This again comes down to operating as a caregiver within the law or using the law to operate illegally by using dispensaries.
See above about the legal aspects. Risk of failure in a business venture, to me, is acceptable when such a failure results in simply not being able to make it, bankruptcy, etc. Not the possibility of prison time. I take such a possibility as being a much greater risk than other businesses face. Ergo, not a valid equivalence.
Dispensaries are illegal, until further law changes. No further comment..
Yes, they were deemed illegal by the State Supreme Court. And yet they continue to operate. Isn’t it funny though that now that ruling will likely be overturned due to pending legislation? As others have rightly pointed out, big business wants its slice... and of course the State wants its slice as well. And honestly the operation of dispensaries is baffling to me. I never understood how anyone could read the language of the MMMA and then construe it to allow for dispensaries. It’s just not there — as the Court has found. But what clearly is there is the provision for caregivers... which oddly is now at jeopardy.
MileHIghGlass has provided a nice concise summation of where we’re heading. The way of the dodo bird.
Last edited: