-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Ron Paul 2012!!! Your thoughts on who we should pick for our "Cause"?
- Thread starter SacredBreh
- Start date
- Status
If You're an American you should see THIS! for real
https://www.icmag.com/ic/newreply.ph...eply&p=4982906
Somebody cares and is wanting the truth. Great rant!
https://www.icmag.com/ic/newreply.ph...eply&p=4982906
Somebody cares and is wanting the truth. Great rant!
Plant Early
Member
"If Johnny wants to take this here slot token home and stuff it in his mattress,..."
T
texsativa
I can't believe people are not voting for Dr. Paul.
I say if you're for Dr. Paul, vote for him.
I know I will whether I think he will win or lose. He is, by far, the best man for the job, in my opinion of course.
If that's a pre-1964 .25c token it's worth 6.41 FRN today (including the 10% copper). That's a 2,564% increase increase in value.
Yes sir, Johnny will certainly take the token over the paper.
He can do better.
Morning Joe says the Republican party has a chance to win the presidency, control of the Senate and retain the House. But, according to Joe they'll lose it all over divisive social issues. Talking about his wife who apparently never voted for an evil democrat saying the contraceptive shit is over the top.
No ones going to vote third party, the only thing people care about is beating obama.
And don't highlight and resize a terrible idea to influence casual readers. Thats sketchy.
Another interesting random article I came across, maine is most certainty a questionable situation.
http://m.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/carol-paul-election-fraud-confirmed
Carol Paul: Election fraud confirmed
March 1st, 2012 by Jeffrey Phelps
Carol Paul breaks her silence and tells a WTPN activist that half of Ron Paul’s votes are being thrown away during a post-AZ GOP debate viewing party appearance backstage.
The normally very quiet, Carol Paul, wife of Republican GOP candidate, Dr. Ron Paul, was seen here on tape blaming election fraud as the culprit behind some of Ron Paul’s caucus losses in the 2012 race for the Republican nomination.
After last week’s Presidential debate, an activist for the “We the People Network” found a way through security to make it backstage, just prior to a scheduled speech Ron Paul was due to make at the New Life Bible Church in Mesa, AZ, minutes after the final GOP debate on Wednesday, Feb. 22.
Little did the activist know that simply finding a way to talk with Mr. and Mrs. Paul backstage would turn into such a potentially huge story, with Mrs. Paul coming forward, without being prompted, to explain her thoughts on the final results of some of the caucuses that have taken place during the campaign season.
To the average Ron Paul supporter, gaining w to speak in person with the Congressman and his family on video is one thing, but what ensued may have instead turned into quotes by Carol Paul that could very well end up being an international story for both the activist and the Ron Paul campaign.
After finding out the activist was a member of the “We the People Network” Mrs. Paul must have felt more comfortable and began openly talking about her own views on how the votes have been counted thus far, in the caucus states in particular, hoping to somehow get someone to help the Pauls expose vast election theft taking place in many of the state elections.
Becoming too loud about total rampant US election hijacking actually taking place, however, could be very dangerous for the Paul campaign, possibly giving the establishment’s media ammunition to use against Paul, in order to further cement the Ron Paul conspiracy “theorist” paradigm they’ve tried to instill into public debate since he first ran for President back in 1988.
Exclaiming her displeasure with the amount of votes that vote-counters are allowing Ron Paul to receive, Mrs. Paul told the WTPN activist, “They throw out half of the votes,” referring to the unfolding national election fraud scandals surfacing across the country, as the race itself continues to unfold.
Mrs. Paul went on to say, “They said, well, they just wrote them on paper, and they can’t recount them, so they just threw them out.”
Mrs. Paul was simply noting facts about the blatancy of the establishment’s efforts to quell any potential candidacy momentum that would have likely happened from obvious wins that were simply stolen from Paul, through open election fraud, in many of the caucus states.
The biggest momentum theft thus far likely being Iowa’s Caucus.
Stealing Iowa from Paul was like stealing guaranteed momentum from a victory that would have likely been tough for the other candidates to overcome.
As it turns out, stealing Iowa instead gave that momentum largely to Romney, then some to Santorum after they were forced to admit mistakes, yet still hiding the real results in favor of Santorum instead.
Nothing can take the place of that initial win, however, and the boost a candidate receives from winning the famous Iowa Caucus has been traditionally huge for any candidacy. The very reason they couldn’t afford to let Paul take the state.
The media would have definitely had to work much harder to get people to believe the most common establishment talking points about Ron Paul, like the one everyone’s heard, “he’s not electable.” Despite the fact he was officially in second place in delegates prior to the Michigan and AZ caucuses, according to Paul and CNN, even picking up a few more on Wednesday in MI.
The most ironic aspect of the situation, however, may be the fact that even though they’ve openly stolen at least 3 caucuses from the Ron Paul campaign and the American people, mostly attempting to give the people the false impression that he isn’t as popular as he actually is, he still continues to poll well enough to threaten winning many of the states, forcing pro-status quo minions to keep openly committing election fraud anyway…a true testament to how popular he truly is and would be if the establishment and it’s media were treating these elections fairly and being honest with the people.
Although it’s unclear as to which state or states Mrs. Paul is referring to in particular, what is clear is that fact that many of the caucus states thus far have turned out such poor performances by state party officials that many of the states are still in question as to who the actual winners truly are.
In Iowa, for instance, 8 precincts from the early January, “First in the Nation” caucus still shows outstanding and permanently unverifiable results, some of which were heavy Ron Paul favorites, as was the case in Nevada.
And while Nevada had very similar circumstances play out there, state party officials in both of those states stepped down in humiliation after each state turned out results that would leave the most sinister of election thieves jealous of the mayhem created by the official election hijackers during this campaign season.
Maine, however, ended up possibly being even worse, if it’s possible that one stolen election can be worse than another, as unable to steal the election outright, like Iowa and Nevada in particular, party officials in Maine simply postponed the entire caucus for an entire week in some counties. Yet still found it necessary to declare Romney the winner that evening, even though it was too close to call with only 84% of the precincts reporting and less than 190 votes seperating the two.
Not only were the postponed counties in Maine likely Ron Paul wins, it also bought more time for pro-establishment party officials to alter the totals before submitting them to the public…just as they did in, at least, Iowa and Nevada.
What’s also clear is that the Paul campaign is aware of the circumstances, and although not yet saying too much about the incredible situation unfolding right under many American’s noses, both Ron Paul and now his wife have stepped up to the plate for the truth about the establishment’s outright willingness to thwart the wishes of the American people.
Ironically, just as that establishment continues to try to sell the deaths of millions of innocent people and soldiers around the world, in the name of “spreading democracy,” those same establishment ‘officials’ here at home are literally taking that democracy and “throwing it away” themselves.
Supporting medium:
Mrs. Paul Speaks to WE THE PEOPLE! http://youtu.be/0ECEse6HjXw
Ron Paul talks about Maine Caucus & Delegates - Neil Cavuto http://youtu.be/ccxqYlUUWeo
http://m.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/carol-paul-election-fraud-confirmed
Carol Paul: Election fraud confirmed
March 1st, 2012 by Jeffrey Phelps
Carol Paul breaks her silence and tells a WTPN activist that half of Ron Paul’s votes are being thrown away during a post-AZ GOP debate viewing party appearance backstage.
The normally very quiet, Carol Paul, wife of Republican GOP candidate, Dr. Ron Paul, was seen here on tape blaming election fraud as the culprit behind some of Ron Paul’s caucus losses in the 2012 race for the Republican nomination.
After last week’s Presidential debate, an activist for the “We the People Network” found a way through security to make it backstage, just prior to a scheduled speech Ron Paul was due to make at the New Life Bible Church in Mesa, AZ, minutes after the final GOP debate on Wednesday, Feb. 22.
Little did the activist know that simply finding a way to talk with Mr. and Mrs. Paul backstage would turn into such a potentially huge story, with Mrs. Paul coming forward, without being prompted, to explain her thoughts on the final results of some of the caucuses that have taken place during the campaign season.
To the average Ron Paul supporter, gaining w to speak in person with the Congressman and his family on video is one thing, but what ensued may have instead turned into quotes by Carol Paul that could very well end up being an international story for both the activist and the Ron Paul campaign.
After finding out the activist was a member of the “We the People Network” Mrs. Paul must have felt more comfortable and began openly talking about her own views on how the votes have been counted thus far, in the caucus states in particular, hoping to somehow get someone to help the Pauls expose vast election theft taking place in many of the state elections.
Becoming too loud about total rampant US election hijacking actually taking place, however, could be very dangerous for the Paul campaign, possibly giving the establishment’s media ammunition to use against Paul, in order to further cement the Ron Paul conspiracy “theorist” paradigm they’ve tried to instill into public debate since he first ran for President back in 1988.
Exclaiming her displeasure with the amount of votes that vote-counters are allowing Ron Paul to receive, Mrs. Paul told the WTPN activist, “They throw out half of the votes,” referring to the unfolding national election fraud scandals surfacing across the country, as the race itself continues to unfold.
Mrs. Paul went on to say, “They said, well, they just wrote them on paper, and they can’t recount them, so they just threw them out.”
Mrs. Paul was simply noting facts about the blatancy of the establishment’s efforts to quell any potential candidacy momentum that would have likely happened from obvious wins that were simply stolen from Paul, through open election fraud, in many of the caucus states.
The biggest momentum theft thus far likely being Iowa’s Caucus.
Stealing Iowa from Paul was like stealing guaranteed momentum from a victory that would have likely been tough for the other candidates to overcome.
As it turns out, stealing Iowa instead gave that momentum largely to Romney, then some to Santorum after they were forced to admit mistakes, yet still hiding the real results in favor of Santorum instead.
Nothing can take the place of that initial win, however, and the boost a candidate receives from winning the famous Iowa Caucus has been traditionally huge for any candidacy. The very reason they couldn’t afford to let Paul take the state.
The media would have definitely had to work much harder to get people to believe the most common establishment talking points about Ron Paul, like the one everyone’s heard, “he’s not electable.” Despite the fact he was officially in second place in delegates prior to the Michigan and AZ caucuses, according to Paul and CNN, even picking up a few more on Wednesday in MI.
The most ironic aspect of the situation, however, may be the fact that even though they’ve openly stolen at least 3 caucuses from the Ron Paul campaign and the American people, mostly attempting to give the people the false impression that he isn’t as popular as he actually is, he still continues to poll well enough to threaten winning many of the states, forcing pro-status quo minions to keep openly committing election fraud anyway…a true testament to how popular he truly is and would be if the establishment and it’s media were treating these elections fairly and being honest with the people.
Although it’s unclear as to which state or states Mrs. Paul is referring to in particular, what is clear is that fact that many of the caucus states thus far have turned out such poor performances by state party officials that many of the states are still in question as to who the actual winners truly are.
In Iowa, for instance, 8 precincts from the early January, “First in the Nation” caucus still shows outstanding and permanently unverifiable results, some of which were heavy Ron Paul favorites, as was the case in Nevada.
And while Nevada had very similar circumstances play out there, state party officials in both of those states stepped down in humiliation after each state turned out results that would leave the most sinister of election thieves jealous of the mayhem created by the official election hijackers during this campaign season.
Maine, however, ended up possibly being even worse, if it’s possible that one stolen election can be worse than another, as unable to steal the election outright, like Iowa and Nevada in particular, party officials in Maine simply postponed the entire caucus for an entire week in some counties. Yet still found it necessary to declare Romney the winner that evening, even though it was too close to call with only 84% of the precincts reporting and less than 190 votes seperating the two.
Not only were the postponed counties in Maine likely Ron Paul wins, it also bought more time for pro-establishment party officials to alter the totals before submitting them to the public…just as they did in, at least, Iowa and Nevada.
What’s also clear is that the Paul campaign is aware of the circumstances, and although not yet saying too much about the incredible situation unfolding right under many American’s noses, both Ron Paul and now his wife have stepped up to the plate for the truth about the establishment’s outright willingness to thwart the wishes of the American people.
Ironically, just as that establishment continues to try to sell the deaths of millions of innocent people and soldiers around the world, in the name of “spreading democracy,” those same establishment ‘officials’ here at home are literally taking that democracy and “throwing it away” themselves.
Supporting medium:
Mrs. Paul Speaks to WE THE PEOPLE! http://youtu.be/0ECEse6HjXw
Ron Paul talks about Maine Caucus & Delegates - Neil Cavuto http://youtu.be/ccxqYlUUWeo
Bush v Gore aside, I'd watch how hard I flip the fraud bit.
Every day Marco Rubio and Bob McDonald open their mouths it's a good day for Rand Paul, should he entertain the idea of serving as Vice President of the United States of America.
Problem is, his party requires bending over and they already slipped Mitt the contraception sausage. The party wants the opposition to look like the party of intrusion, so the lead VP candidate governor introduces intrusion in the form of bodily penetration. The party is banking that more will fall for the banana in their tail pipe than the idea their party leaders are nuts. Women are 52% of the electorate and as many as 99% of them use or have used contraceptives. How do they come up with this stuff?
Are they scorning women to play God? Rush called the woman that was denied the opportunity to testify before Darrel Issa's committe on contraception a slut who needed to video tape her slut sessions for everybody else to watch. That's attempting to shame women into something they might not choose for themselves. Rich people don't have abortions, the procedure is called something else to relieve the stigma.Rush has had 4 wives in 30 years, no kids and I wouldn't be surprised if he's been exposed to a rich abortion or at least contraception. No problem with Rushbo donning a rubber, so long as he can find his size. Nothing wrong with his insurance covering his Viagra because opiates render his Rush Limpy.
ought to be banned from speaking.
Every day Marco Rubio and Bob McDonald open their mouths it's a good day for Rand Paul, should he entertain the idea of serving as Vice President of the United States of America.
Problem is, his party requires bending over and they already slipped Mitt the contraception sausage. The party wants the opposition to look like the party of intrusion, so the lead VP candidate governor introduces intrusion in the form of bodily penetration. The party is banking that more will fall for the banana in their tail pipe than the idea their party leaders are nuts. Women are 52% of the electorate and as many as 99% of them use or have used contraceptives. How do they come up with this stuff?
Are they scorning women to play God? Rush called the woman that was denied the opportunity to testify before Darrel Issa's committe on contraception a slut who needed to video tape her slut sessions for everybody else to watch. That's attempting to shame women into something they might not choose for themselves. Rich people don't have abortions, the procedure is called something else to relieve the stigma.Rush has had 4 wives in 30 years, no kids and I wouldn't be surprised if he's been exposed to a rich abortion or at least contraception. No problem with Rushbo donning a rubber, so long as he can find his size. Nothing wrong with his insurance covering his Viagra because opiates render his Rush Limpy.
ought to be banned from speaking.
Last edited:
^Rush Limbaugh is great. why? because he is a great piece of shit landmark. A black hole of shit that all powerfully attracts all other shit, trapping it in a weave of shit so tight that the laws of shit physics break down, and make it impossible for that shit to ever exist again in the sane universe. If I ever find myself agreeing with the way he is treating someone then it is a reminder to me that I need to better educate myself on the person he is speaking of and the subject on hand, so I don't become a piece of shit like him.
Rush makes actual conservatives look bad.
Rush makes actual conservatives look bad.
No one is going to vote third party?
This thread should have been closed after the first post if ANYONE thought DR Paul could win the GOP nomination.
Terrible idea?
Please explain? Tell me how Ron Paul defeats Mitt Romney without anyone elses help?
Romney has enough money to buy every big state. He will win certainly win California, Wash, OR, New York, and all of NE.
THEORETICALLY, Dr Paul is only running for the GOP nomination, so once Mitt reaches a MAJORITY (>50%)... its over johnny!
Dr Pauls only chance to win the GOP nomination is for a brokered convention, something only possible if a candidate fails to win a MAJORITY.
So ANY vote that is not for Romney is a vote that will help Dr Paul. Furthermore, my popular vote for Santorum, which may give SANTORUM electoral votes, instead of my popular vote that will gain Dr Paul ZERO electoral votes is MORE HELPFUL to Dr PAUL.
Longview.
Unless you can explain to me how Dr Paul is going to win a MAJORITY of the the delegates?
I want Dr Paul to run 3rd party and make both candidates look like fools (al la Ross Perot) for their foreign, drug, and border policies during the debates.
Real political discourse, instead of just following their scripts.
(FWIW, i fucking hate Santorum, and everything he is about. He is worse than Newt because he hides behind the shield of religion.)
-
I like it. I read an article about that fat bastard (and his security detail.) He and 6 or 7 other black SUVs take off from his house for the 1/2 mile dive to the studio, lol. They all line up 3 hours later to take him home.
I don't know if this is true but a friend told me that Charles Barkley threw a redneck through a plate glass window after the redneck talked too much shit. I doubt even Charles could throw that fat sac of shit but I'd love to see somebody trash his security and suplex his ass.
With as weak as both Mitt and Rick are with and with Paul picking up delegates here and there no one reaching a majority may be possible.
Thats my point.
Two very recent elections demonstrate how false this is, and should be. I can then use the 1968 election to illustrate THE ONLY WAY DR PAUL CAN BE ELECTED.
The 2000 Presidential Election Electoral votes came down to
271 Bush
266 Gore.
You need a MAJORITY of the electoral votes. Because this was only a two person race, one person, by definition, must reach a majority.
The 1992 Presidential Election was closer to what we COULD have this year. The POPULAR vote went
43.0% Clinton
37.5% Bush
18.9% Perot
Now Clinton kicked Bushs ass in the electoral college, AND Perot failed to win ONE state, but... this was before the 'Republican Revolution' the country, and its electoral college is much more evenly divided.
The 1968 Presidential Election was more divided than the country today. The last 'viable' third party option before Perot was a 'regional' candidate named George Wallace.
Wallace only pulled in 13.5% of the Popular vote, all in the south, but he won 5 states and 46 Electoral votes.
SO... a third party candidate, with a regional message (small states want states rights), could tip the entire election to The House of Representatives where anything can happen (and is Dr Paul's only chance).
-
I think it's been speculated that might diminish his son's future opportunity with the republican party.
If Ron Paul were to die tomorrow, I'd still write him in. There are NO circumstances where I'd vote for anyone else. This attitude was developed after I realized how much the media was trying to dictate my choice. It's my protest, "fuck you" vote, and it won't ever change.
- Status
