He had talent, could play guitar very well, but it seems to me that younger generations are so taken with his talent, that they don't see how derivative he was, taking so much from those who came before him. He literally stole parts of the stage show from other performers from previous generations. Sure everyone is influenced by what came before. But in my eyes, as well as many of my generation he was not a "music visionary" as you say (and so do many others), just someone copying Hendrix, Little Richard, James Brown, David Bowie etc., which he did very well, but to me that is the limit of his "vision". And by copying those performers I mentioned, each with outstanding, innovative, visionary stage shows, how could he go wrong? But to call him the visionary?he has proven a great talent and music visionary which you seem to be denying due to personal opinions
If he broke new ground musically, I'm not hearing it.
If he broke new ground on stage, well I just explained that.
If he broke new ground lyrically or making music to protest society, well I honestly haven't read all his lyrics, but partying like it's 1999 doesn't quite cut new ground for me, after all I lived thru the disco era... I hear he did donate a lot, and I can respect that, but again, that's a rich private person vs musical "genius".
I've heard ppl say he broke new ground because suddenly it was OK for a black man to wear mascarra and not be so macho. Does no one remember Little Richard?
Believe it or not, I find Weird Al Yankovich to have more talent (and he's a lot funnier!), as he doesn't pretend to be some visionary, just a humorist copying the music and satirizing the lyrics of others (better than anyone else has ever done to so many songs!)
Perhaps someone can explain to me what exactly was Prince's unique visionary contribution to music.
Last edited: