D
Deleted member 534625
Honestly mate,Reversals are a pain, but I have never seen any evidence that males are required in a breeding program. The evidence strikes the other way - female genes demonstrably carry everything we value in the plant, whether or not they have a male parent.
For males to matter, they must carry invisible genes that act in females, over generations, as some kind of protective but unmeasurable influence. How would that work? What known genetic mechanisms could underlie it?
Don’t get me wrong - as with any breeding strategy, there are more than enough ways to fail. But, the clear advantages from a genetic and selection point of view mean that selfing will continue to be a major tool for most breeders.
I’m not sure where you’re gathering your information but I could not disagree more. Males have always been necessary for truly sexually stable lines, and is a central cornerstone of 100s of years of horticulture practices. They are not “invisible genes,” most people are just to lazy to grow the males out to fruition, and get frustrated with the process.
If your referring to the last 10 years worth of cookie cuts as empirical evidence of not needing good dads in the mix, then I’m sorry but your part of the problem with modern breeding.