What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Philips 315w CDM Elite (CMH)

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
When I changed from 600mh to the 630 LEC I didn't see a decline in heat. Might be a tad bit more in my DR 150. Using the 630 I notice some heat stress on the plants.
 

Ez Rider

Active member
Veteran
When I changed from 600mh to the 630 LEC I didn't see a decline in heat. Might be a tad bit more in my DR 150. Using the 630 I notice some heat stress on the plants.

If you're talking about the sunlightsupply 630w lec, that mother runs stupid hot compared to the C/G's. I can easily hold my hand 1" under the bulb tip on my C/G's. My hoods are cool to the touch at all times. Running the lamps horizontal in that stamped hood traps a LOT of heat, and creates two large hot spots under the hood. They have a demo model at my local store, and the top of the hood gets pretty warm as well.

Maybe it was light stress? I notice some when I first switched to cmh.
 

timmur

Well-known member
Veteran
Ya, really cant mess with the 700 btu with ballast out the room...

As I was considering CMH to replace my DE's, the price of the Cyclops turned me off and didnt read much about them. Price still turns me way off about them. The price, THEN shipping....

For a big room though, these bad boys replace 4k in HPS and is only 1200 watts with next to no heat and I believe around $2000 a light...
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=7309716&postcount=3

Do the math - Greenbeams for the win.

Greenbeams vs. DE HPS
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I found these Mogul base 315 4200k. I might grab 1 just to compare. Anyone know if these are not the correct type?. Whats the difference between TT and ED series bulbs?. I will give 1 of these TT bulbs a try. I wont need to use the pgz18 adapter. I noticed the E39 base bulbs don't use 2 [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]envelopes. Is the outer [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]envelope thicker on these Mogul base bulbs ?? [/FONT]

I would be very, very cautious about running those in an open fixture. It's a no-name company doing some type of knock-off. The projected life is half the Philips lamps.

No thanks.
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
Based on airflow in/out, and temperature difference between in/out air I figure somewhere ~800btu/unit, ballast included. Based on measurements taken running 6 C/G's in a 5x9 tent.

You're measuring the amount of heat not escaping thru the walls of the tent.
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The only thing I'm concerned about is if it failed with me near it. Here is the Phillips. It says life span is 20k vs 15k for the knock off. I think that's not correct should be 30k. Mogul should be rated for open fixture. If it comes with any Specs I will post them

http://www.amazon.com/Philips-MasterColor-Elite-315W-ED37/dp/B01A8HT6DG

After checking, the Philips ED37 lamp actually does have a 20k hour life. It is the PGZ18 version that has a 30k hours life. The internal operating pressures of the Philips Elite series lamps is roughly 10x that of other lamp families. Whether or not that holds true for the knock-off is unknown, but.....
 

pug1010

Member
Hi all:)

Just wanted to thank everyone for an amazing thread … great contributions and information. It has been good reading the complete thread over the last week, as it is possible to see how prices have come down (on some systems) and the fine-tuning of the technology.

In my situation I move a bit, so am really interested in using the cmh system in 120v and 240v situations. Additionally, I might be growing in a rented place with a room that will have less than ideal reflection - probably just flat, white paint. From posts on this thread, it looks like there are a couple of options at the moment, for systems that include a built-in 120-240v ballasts, including …
Growbeam:
http://www.horticulturesource.com/p...hYh_3UlKU3OjfOJS14hV3GOhIEklMg5fBaRoC0R7w_wcB

Phantom:
http://growershouse.com/phantom-cmh-reflector-ballast-and-bulb-kit

Nanolux:
http://growershouse.com/nanolux-cmh-315w-fixture-120-240v

From Rives and jhhnn's suggestions (thanks for this thread rives … it is great reading), I would prefer to go with the Phillips ballast. At the moment, I have found a dpapillon 315w system from a Canadian retailer (just checking prices … http://www.optexlighting.com/d‐papillon-315w-full-spectrum/), which if I recall is a setup that Rives liked and that uses the phillips ballast.

I have previously used solis-tek hps systems and really liked them. They mentioned that they have a cmh ballast coming out in the second quarter of this year … so that will be interesting as well. Sorry for the rumble ….

I will most likely go with 10gal fabric pots using an organic soil mix - the dirt pots are about 18" in diameter, so will probably put four together to make a 3' x 3' square grow area. Just wondering if using the dpapillon with a transformer (240v to 120v) would cause any major inefficiencies or added noise.

Thanks heaps:)
 

Ez Rider

Active member
Veteran
Hi all:)

Just wanted to thank everyone for an amazing thread … great contributions and information. It has been good reading the complete thread over the last week, as it is possible to see how prices have come down (on some systems) and the fine-tuning of the technology.

In my situation I move a bit, so am really interested in using the cmh system in 120v and 240v situations. Additionally, I might be growing in a rented place with a room that will have less than ideal reflection - probably just flat, white paint. From posts on this thread, it looks like there are a couple of options at the moment, for systems that include a built-in 120-240v ballasts, including …
Growbeam:
http://www.horticulturesource.com/p...hYh_3UlKU3OjfOJS14hV3GOhIEklMg5fBaRoC0R7w_wcB

Phantom:
http://growershouse.com/phantom-cmh-reflector-ballast-and-bulb-kit

Nanolux:
http://growershouse.com/nanolux-cmh-315w-fixture-120-240v

From Rives and jhhnn's suggestions (thanks for this thread rives … it is great reading), I would prefer to go with the Phillips ballast. At the moment, I have found a dpapillon 315w system from a Canadian retailer (just checking prices … http://www.optexlighting.com/d‐papillon-315w-full-spectrum/), which if I recall is a setup that Rives liked and that uses the phillips ballast.

I have previously used solis-tek hps systems and really liked them. They mentioned that they have a cmh ballast coming out in the second quarter of this year … so that will be interesting as well. Sorry for the rumble ….

I will most likely go with 10gal fabric pots using an organic soil mix - the dirt pots are about 18" in diameter, so will probably put four together to make a 3' x 3' square grow area. Just wondering if using the dpapillon with a transformer (240v to 120v) would cause any major inefficiencies or added noise.

Thanks heaps:)

Take a look at Cycloptics Greenbeams. Their ballasts are universal 120/208/240/277v. They also make a 377/480v version I believe.

"growbeam"?....hmmm?
 
Last edited:

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I got the bulb today.. No spec sheet with it.. I cant say its cheaply made. looks OK to me. This saler had both types of bulbs TT and ED. I like TT bulbs more then ED bulbs. No clue if that impacts spectrum? .
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2873.jpg
    DSCN2873.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 19
  • DSCN2875.jpg
    DSCN2875.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 19
  • DSCN2876.jpg
    DSCN2876.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 22

pug1010

Member
Thanks EZ:)

Sorry my mistake twice … the grow beam should have been Greenbeam and the link should have been:
http://growershouse.com/cycloptics-greenbeams-315w-ceramic-mh-hobbyist-120-240v-fixture

I really like the look of the GB. I haven't heard one bad report either or really any problems with them. They seem like very reliable pieces of kit.

My main concern with the GB design is that it strongly suggests having a very good reflective grow area. In my situation, the grow area will have far less than ideal reflection. I'm not sure if the other cmh systems integrate the reflectivity of the whole grow area, as much - maybe other vertical reflectors like the dpapillion 315w also depend as much upon the reflectivity of the grow area. I was also unsure whether the new PARGrow GB ballast is offered as a multi-voltage ballast or if you have to get either a 120v or a 240v (or 277v or 347/480v). The link above for the 120v/240v Greenbeams system might be for the older Welthink ballast - have asked and waiting on a reply.

Perhaps in my situation … a horizontally mounted cmh lamp (or two) would be a better way to go, like the Double dPapillon 630w system or the Sun System LEC 630 and just use a transformer (in Canada). Maybe they don't need as good as reflectivity as the GB …. so many questions, but it is nice that there are a fair few options and so much great advice.:)
 

Ez Rider

Active member
Veteran
Thanks EZ:)

Sorry my mistake twice … the grow beam should have been Greenbeam and the link should have been:
http://growershouse.com/cycloptics-greenbeams-315w-ceramic-mh-hobbyist-120-240v-fixture

I really like the look of the GB. I haven't heard one bad report either or really any problems with them. They seem like very reliable pieces of kit.

My main concern with the GB design is that it strongly suggests having a very good reflective grow area. In my situation, the grow area will have far less than ideal reflection. I'm not sure if the other cmh systems integrate the reflectivity of the whole grow area, as much - maybe other vertical reflectors like the dpapillion 315w also depend as much upon the reflectivity of the grow area. I was also unsure whether the new PARGrow GB ballast is offered as a multi-voltage ballast or if you have to get either a 120v or a 240v (or 277v or 347/480v). The link above for the 120v/240v Greenbeams system might be for the older Welthink ballast - have asked and waiting on a reply.

Perhaps in my situation … a horizontally mounted cmh lamp (or two) would be a better way to go, like the Double dPapillon 630w system or the Sun System LEC 630 and just use a transformer (in Canada). Maybe they don't need as good as reflectivity as the GB …. so many questions, but it is nice that there are a fair few options and so much great advice.:)

I strongly SUGGEST you invest in some form of reflective covering for you walls. Flat white paint is cheap as shit. You're talking about a small space, so there are plenty of low cost options. With 315w lamps, you need to maximize your all around "reflectivity", or you're pissing into the wind...just my:2cents:
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
Hey pug, flat white paint is a decent solution to use in conjunction with Greenbeams.

With any grow space or lighting choice. Some of the films may be marginally better but they're not cheaper, easier, or easier to maintain.
 

pug1010

Member
thanks Jhhnn

The money I was going to spend on semi-enclosures … can always be put towards a better grow light.

Just wondering … for all those also renting and not wanting to drill holes in the ceiling for lighting mounts ...

Does anyone know of some good (fairly priced) grow light stands that could be used with these cmh lights?
 

Muleskinner

Active member
Veteran
With any grow space or lighting choice. Some of the films may be marginally better but they're not cheaper, easier, or easier to maintain.

it's funny, conventional wisdom used to say use white paint and avoid reflective surfaces because they create hotspots. Tents have changed that mentality. But some of my best yields were in closets with the walls paint brighted white.

You have to think 70 or 80% of the light is hitting the canopy directly. So 10 or 20% difference in reflectivity of the walls is not going to change much. By the time the light bounces off a wall and comes back it's already diffused out from traveling the distance.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top