What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Philips 315w CDM Elite (CMH)

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The 3400 does have reports of higher output, but the spectrum chart shows that the difference is mostly an increase in yellow and green spectrum.
3100kR or 3000kR is what most people are selecting in 630 DE tubes.


3400?

There are 3 spectrum's available ..
3100
3100-R
4200
 

abirdintheair

Buteo Jamaicensis
Veteran
The 3400 does have reports of higher output, but the spectrum chart shows that the difference is mostly an increase in yellow and green spectrum.
3100kR or 3000kR is what most people are selecting in 630 DE tubes.

thanks for the info :tiphat:
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
Unexpected pheno of Delicatessen's Queen Mother shows off her trichs for the camera- grown under 315's-

picture.php
 

Raho

Well-known member
Veteran
3400?

There are 3 spectrum's available ..
3100
3100-R
4200

ceramic solutions has different products listed than growers choice.
3000k R (not 3100)
4200
3400 (never seen this anywhere else. They say it puts out PPF of 1400)
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
ceramic solutions has different products listed than growers choice.
3000k R (not 3100)
4200
3400 (never seen this anywhere else. They say it puts out PPF of 1400)


I was looking at there 3400 spectrum. Its got spikes in the green/yellow spectrum. We don't need spikes in that area. Not sure why one would use that bulb. I would just get a 3100 or 4200.. I see they don't offer a 630 4200.
 

gh0stm0de

Active member
3400K report for any who may be curious. Regarding spectral output, clearly the 3000K-Red offers the best spectrum for flower, but the 3400K offer 15%~ more intensity. So rather than limit grower's choices, we chose to offer both of these flower bulbs and let fellow growers decide which they like. The result has been almost equal interest between the two flower bulbs.


https://www.ceramicsolutions.us/product-page/630w-4200k-bulb

Also, here is link to our 4200K, we have always stocked one..
 

Attachments

  • DE CMH630W(3200K-3400K)-2.jpg
    DE CMH630W(3200K-3400K)-2.jpg
    133.4 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:

Miraculous Meds

Well-known member
6 315w phantom cmh's, with phillips 3100 bulbs.


Full horizontal trellis, a few days into flower. I wish I flipped a week earlier, lol... Time to prune out some suckers, set another trellis, and raise the lights.


picture.php

picture.php
 

Miraculous Meds

Well-known member
4 sun system air cooled 630w reflectors, with phillips 3100 bulbs, in a 8'x8' tent. Going to set the trellis today or tomorrow, give them a couple days to fill in and adjust, then flip. I like these fixtures, but they are heavy like a tank. Also because the ballasts are in the hood, I decided to air cool and keep the glass shield on. 2 things im not fond of, but I got a steal on these fixtures($300 with phillips bulbs), so I decided to give them a go.
picture.php

picture.php

picture.php
 
I was looking at there 3400 spectrum. Its got spikes in the green/yellow spectrum. We don't need spikes in that area. Not sure why one would use that bulb. I would just get a 3100 or 4200.. I see they don't offer a 630 4200.
Yeah if you want more yellow and green just go for a HPS - they have plenty and put out a much higher lumen/watt than any CMH.
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
They look great but I agree about flipping earlier. That tent ceiling looks awfully close.. you could run out of height before they stop stretching.

Jah... I see a jungle management problem in his future. I don't scrog or anything, which probably changes things somewhat, but I have to flower at 15" to keep exuberant individuals out of the light with a 6' ceiling...
 
That' not accurate at all. CDM's put out more par radiation per watt than any other HID source. HPS wastes a huge portion of output in the infrared-

https://www.cycloptics.com/sites/default/files/USU_spectral_analysis.pdf
Thanks for your link. It confirmed that HPS produces a significant portion of it's output in the green-yellow nm range. I was already aware that HPS generates significant amounts of output in the IR range, as does CMH to a lesser degree.

Phillips 315w 3100K CMH ...= 33,000 lumens (105 lumens/watt)
600w High pressure sodium = 90,000 lumens (150 lumens/watt)

Cheers
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
Thanks for your link. It confirmed that HPS produces a significant portion of it's output in the green-yellow nm range. I was already aware that HPS generates significant amounts of output in the IR range, as does CMH to a lesser degree.

Phillips 315w 3100K CMH ...= 33,000 lumens (105 lumens/watt)
600w High pressure sodium = 90,000 lumens (150 lumens/watt)

Cheers

I'm just trying to help you clear up a common misconception. Lumens is a measurement heavily weighted to perception by the human eye called the luminosity function-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity_function

It doesn't really apply to plants very well. For that, we need to use a different unweighted measure, PAR-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthetically_active_radiation

Yes, what you said about lumens & spectrum of HPS is true. It just doesn't apply to plants the way you think it does. What does apply is what I offered earlier, that CDM's put out more PAR/watt than any other HID source. Honest.
 

Miraculous Meds

Well-known member
They look great but I agree about flipping earlier. That tent ceiling looks awfully close.. you could run out of height before they stop stretching.



I have 40" from the first trellis to bottom of fixture when I raise the lights to their final position. then I plan on triple trellising. The next two, being 8" apart. So the top trellis will be 24" from lights. Hoping I can at least let them get within 18" before light stress, but the par is pretty intense at 18" with 6 lights in there.


I was hoping not to bend anymore branches after the first trellis, but im going to have to weave thru the second one, instead of just using it for support. Lots of sucker branch and leaf pruning in my future.
 

Jhhnn

Active member
Veteran
I have 40" from the first trellis to bottom of fixture when I raise the lights to their final position. then I plan on triple trellising. The next two, being 8" apart. So the top trellis will be 24" from lights. Hoping I can at least let them get within 18" before light stress, but the par is pretty intense at 18" with 6 lights in there.


I was hoping not to bend anymore branches after the first trellis, but im going to have to weave thru the second one, instead of just using it for support. Lots of sucker branch and leaf pruning in my future.

Def have some work ahead of you.. I may have missed it, but how big is the tent?
 
M

moose eater

Sorry for redirecting the discussion, and verging on a question re. hybrid lighting, but....

Can anyone point me toward a tried and true, proven, effective LED flood-style bulb (whether for agro-specific use or not) that I can augment my 315s with, before I move into the next throw? Preferably in the far red spectrum.

As stated earlier without such directness in inquiry, I would like to place (4) LED flood-style bulbs into the corners of my boxes (1 LED per corner), and have them suspended on heavy cord and either chain or line.

Prefer plant-usable spectrum to bring up the PAR/watts per sq. ft., and an actual draw of 10-15 watts per bulb, with (ideally), at least an equivalent output of a 120 to 150 watt incandescent.

Preferably without paying $40+/bulb, but if that's what is required, then that's what is required.

Thanks.
 
I'm just trying to help you clear up a common misconception. Lumens is a measurement heavily weighted to perception by the human eye called the luminosity function-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity_function

It doesn't really apply to plants very well. For that, we need to use a different unweighted measure, PAR-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthetically_active_radiation

Yes, what you said about lumens & spectrum of HPS is true. It just doesn't apply to plants the way you think it does. What does apply is what I offered earlier, that CDM's put out more PAR/watt than any other HID source. Honest.
Thanks. I understand the differences between PAR and Luminous flux quite well. I was simply making the point that if the extra intensity in the 3400K bulb is due to a greater green and yellow output then you may as well use HPS. The reason the 3,100K and 4,200K bulbs are superior to HPS is due to their superior spectrum in regards to PAR, not their luminous flux.

Cheers :)
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top