Genghis Kush
Active member
language creates the world
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Okay let's talk abt Psychics.
- Thread starter med_breeder
- Start date
good story, manSymbols are ancient, but not just that, they are simple, but again they are complications, we didn't needed that before this fallen state, before this we could teleport or fly why not
Once me and my 2 buddies and a girl from a buddy played Spellfire cards (like Magic the Gathering but much better). I was in love with that girl but also loved my buddy, so I had the fuk up of my life what caused me to go insane for a longer period, still recovering, and that decisive one day we played Spellfire, but through playing cards we literary talked about this situation. Symbols, every card was a communication with each other, it was full talk just with symbols, and we all understood perfectly well what each of us was saying, and so we cleared the situation.
That buddies girl, whenever, wherever I would go to town, I would see her, time and place doesn't matter, almost always I would met her, it's unexplainable.
Similar situation I had with one other girl that I instantly liked, it was literary like in Paul van Dyk video "Crush", stalker pro lol.
And I didn't done it by my will, I was just in love, and was thinking about the girl.
Spiritual and material worlds align sometimes... can't explain better in this moment, because it's mindboggling even to think about that, and to understand that, I can't do it alone just with my brain. Magicians think they perfectly understand it, but they are deceived.
imprisons
Thus blessed is the blind man. (visual cues are not effective, thus exploitation of emotive cues via the optical lobes isn't going to happen)
A simple example would be a picture of a naked lady to elicit lust for the purpose of solicitation.
It has everything to do with the exploiting the our nature, especially Pavlovian, in which a system in place by proxy programs behavior in many which is simply exploited by those whose nature it is to see it and effect it.
The American military system works within this framework.
I know the below example will seem abstract but it is to show that there is a known norm in regards to sense stimulation and emotive response.
What remains is that the practice of seeing patterns in our nature and taking advantage of them are older than science.
Even observations in regards to our cosmos, which took millennium if not eons to form.
Just because science hasn't uncovered the workings behind it all doesn't dismiss it all as fancy.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/113/1/99/
Despite considerable evidence that psychopathic criminals are deviant in their emotional reactions, few studies have examined responses to both pleasurable and aversive stimuli or assessed the role of different facets of psychopathy in affective deviations. This study investigated physiological reactions to emotional sounds in prisoners selected according to scores on the 2 factors of Hare's Psychopathy Checklist--Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991). Offenders high on the PCL-R emotional-interpersonal factor, regardless of scores on the social deviance factor, showed diminished skin conductance responses to both pleasant and unpleasant sounds, suggesting a deficit in the action mobilization component of emotional response. Offenders who scored high only on the social deviance factor showed a delay in heart rate differentiation between affective and neutral sounds. These findings indicate abnormal reactivity to both positive and negative emotional stimuli in psychopathic individuals, and suggest differing roles for the 2 facets of psychopathy in affective processing deviations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
"I have the attention span of a fucking goldfish -unknown "
Sounds like something George Carlin would say. Funny man, RIP.
I hope you're wrong.
When you can truly (to yourself, not to anybody else) separate things from AND between "science and nature", you will find there are wilder apparitions within your own walls than outside.
Go ahead, find a truth, and when you do, please come back and let us know.
A simple example would be a picture of a naked lady to elicit lust for the purpose of solicitation.
It has everything to do with the exploiting the our nature, especially Pavlovian, in which a system in place by proxy programs behavior in many which is simply exploited by those whose nature it is to see it and effect it.
The American military system works within this framework.
I know the below example will seem abstract but it is to show that there is a known norm in regards to sense stimulation and emotive response.
What remains is that the practice of seeing patterns in our nature and taking advantage of them are older than science.
Even observations in regards to our cosmos, which took millennium if not eons to form.
Just because science hasn't uncovered the workings behind it all doesn't dismiss it all as fancy.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/113/1/99/
this!
the fact that the Mayan calendars record such intervals indicate many eons passed observation and recording.
one Alautun is 23,040,000,000 days...that's a heck of a lot of keeping track of the stars, about 63 million years.
which makes astrology the oldest science and religion and the basis of all religions today.
contemporary physicists claim the cosmos was created in an instant in the big bang. which begs the question of new stars being born and dying (still conjecture as no one has witnessed these events).
currently we record everything by writing it down or coding it into bits, whereas the only way the ancients could record things was symbols and vocal cues of language (the word).
language had to be very old itself before forming science or religious concepts...jus' sayin'.
Genghis Kush
Active member
The Mayans had access to other dimensions where knowledge can be attained.
----------------
its also possible that human language developed in order to express science(natural observations) and religious(spiritual) concepts.
McKenna has some interesting ideas on the subject:
----------------
its also possible that human language developed in order to express science(natural observations) and religious(spiritual) concepts.
McKenna has some interesting ideas on the subject:
Genghis Kush
Active member
"First of all lets talk about ordinary language which is probably the closest thing to a miracle in the natural world. It's the major neurological manifestation of difference between ourselves and other animals and primates and it's not a physiological difference it's a difference in behavior. Language represents the most complex behavior ever observed in any animal and certainly it's the most complex thing any of us ever learns to do. We're born into what William James calls a blooming buzzing confusion, but by the aquisition of words we mosaic over various sectors of this blooming buzzing confusion with words. We replace the unknown with the known through the substitution of words and by the time a child is two or three they have completely created a cultural mosaic of words that is interposed between them and reality. Reality from that point on is only an unconfirmed rumor brought through the medium of language and every culture accentuates different parts of reality so that in a sense every culture is a different reality. Language is the stuff of the world, not quarks or wave-packets or neutrinos, but language. Everything is made of language. All the constructs of science are actually interlocking constructs of syntax. So that's ordinary language which seems to define reality through a kind of process of lying about it. For instance by creating subject-object distinctions which are, in fact, not true to the matter, but somehow operationally necessary for us to navigate in the kind of lower dimensional space that we inhabit. "
they don't call them magick for nothing....
Well I am not much for religion, but I understand why primates need to feel there is a God much in their own image, and a plan for life for mankind and how to live. I never felt the need in the slightest.
Science does not depend on faith, it can be proven.
Every scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon. Scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don’t change.
I love science like some love religion, maybe we are just both needy?
-SamS
Science does not depend on faith, it can be proven.
Every scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon. Scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don’t change.
I love science like some love religion, maybe we are just both needy?
-SamS
A simple example would be a picture of a naked lady to elicit lust for the purpose of solicitation.
It has everything to do with the exploiting the our nature, especially Pavlovian, in which a system in place by proxy programs behavior in many which is simply exploited by those whose nature it is to see it and effect it.
The American military system works within this framework.
I know the below example will seem abstract but it is to show that there is a known norm in regards to sense stimulation and emotive response.
What remains is that the practice of seeing patterns in our nature and taking advantage of them are older than science.
Even observations in regards to our cosmos, which took millennium if not eons to form.
Just because science hasn't uncovered the workings behind it all doesn't dismiss it all as fancy.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/113/1/99/
this!
the fact that the Mayan calendars record such intervals indicate many eons passed observation and recording.
one Alautun is 23,040,000,000 days...that's a heck of a lot of keeping track of the stars, about 63 million years.
which makes astrology the oldest science and religion and the basis of all religions today.
contemporary physicists claim the cosmos was created in an instant in the big bang. which begs the question of new stars being born and dying (still conjecture as no one has witnessed these events).
currently we record everything by writing it down or coding it into bits, whereas the only way the ancients could record things was symbols and vocal cues of language (the word).
language had to be very old itself before forming science or religious concepts...jus' sayin'.
There are lots of worlds with no language, in fact most.
Quarks or wave-packets or neutrinos are the stuff of the universe, language is rarer then life, which is pretty rare as far as we know.
I am not sure I believe in miracles, but you can. I would vote for life over language....
-SamS
Quarks or wave-packets or neutrinos are the stuff of the universe, language is rarer then life, which is pretty rare as far as we know.
I am not sure I believe in miracles, but you can. I would vote for life over language....
-SamS
Last edited:
how i see it is a person has a 50 / 50 chance of predicting a out come for instance..
NHL's Stanley cup final game 7 there is a 50 / 50 chance of either team winning . No matter what one team will win ...
Same thing can apply for being physic you got a 50 50 chance either you are right or you are wrong ..
Obviously there is a chance of a catastrophic even that will happen ,, asteriod , comet, or volcano's
its been shown in science that it happens so many millions of years etc end of life as we no it and a new beginning of life of some type ..
we are more connected around the world then our parents were back in the day ..
we see things unfolding all over for instance
Texas floods , earth quakes etc ..
natural events soem caused by man, other's just a sequence but its inevitable its when will it happen ..
and how are we going to stay alive ,, with the world at a critical high in food shortages , population , wars all over anyone can clearly see that something big is about to take place
TBH were all really waiting for it to happen Were anxious really sounds stupid but is it ???
we all like suffering pain and death shit its on every channel on TV , media is feeding us it every day to say your not i say your Full of shit ..
Something is going to happen on most of our lifes that will impact human kind
NHL's Stanley cup final game 7 there is a 50 / 50 chance of either team winning . No matter what one team will win ...
Same thing can apply for being physic you got a 50 50 chance either you are right or you are wrong ..
Obviously there is a chance of a catastrophic even that will happen ,, asteriod , comet, or volcano's
its been shown in science that it happens so many millions of years etc end of life as we no it and a new beginning of life of some type ..
we are more connected around the world then our parents were back in the day ..
we see things unfolding all over for instance
Texas floods , earth quakes etc ..
natural events soem caused by man, other's just a sequence but its inevitable its when will it happen ..
and how are we going to stay alive ,, with the world at a critical high in food shortages , population , wars all over anyone can clearly see that something big is about to take place
TBH were all really waiting for it to happen Were anxious really sounds stupid but is it ???
we all like suffering pain and death shit its on every channel on TV , media is feeding us it every day to say your not i say your Full of shit ..
Something is going to happen on most of our lifes that will impact human kind
Genghis Kush
Active member
"All the constructs of science are actually interlocking constructs of syntax. So that's ordinary language which seems to define reality through a kind of process of lying about it. For instance by creating subject-object distinctions which are, in fact, not true to the matter, but somehow operationally necessary for us to navigate in the kind of lower dimensional space that we inhabit. "
I think he was trying to say that when we invent words like quarks and neutrinos, we also invent a reality.
Similarly, the example 'Schrodinger's Cat', where the act of observing affects what is observed.
I think he was trying to say that when we invent words like quarks and neutrinos, we also invent a reality.
Similarly, the example 'Schrodinger's Cat', where the act of observing affects what is observed.
