NIKT
Active member
At 25 degrees: start of operation without power supply: 5000K => 180 lm / W: 3500K => 175 lm / W:
Power supply efficiency. 0.93? Typical
: 5000K => 167.5[lm/W]: 3500K => 162.75 [lm/W]
25 degrees : 5000K 80 CRI SPD samsung :
very similar to b. 2,34 umol/J
25 degrees : 3500K 80 CRI SPD samsung. 2,29 umol/J
At the real operating temperature of the diodes:
it will be less by ?? -> 3% :-> [ even 6-7%, this is the case at higher operating temperatures ]
~3%
2,27 => 5000K
2,22 => 3500K
1:1 => 2,25 umol/J : system efficiency.
Without laboratory measurements, this is just a guess based on the data sheet. The parameters of the strips can be slightly colored upwards. Producers often do that.
You put diffusers on strips _ you additionally reduce the amount of available light by a few %.
Without (Ulbricht'a) integrating sphere _ and spectroradiometer, measuring it will be fun like I am doing. Determination of the distance losses depending on the wall coverage. this is easy - as is interpolation of the total efficiency of the source using a room-specific calibration curve. Assuming that the source is close to point. The problem is hardware grade _ TES1335 is grade B. + - 6% worst case.
I need this
Chinese producers of cheap panels show measurements made of it. Tes1335 is really better for white light.
Power supply efficiency. 0.93? Typical
: 5000K => 167.5[lm/W]: 3500K => 162.75 [lm/W]
25 degrees : 5000K 80 CRI SPD samsung :
very similar to b. 2,34 umol/J
25 degrees : 3500K 80 CRI SPD samsung. 2,29 umol/J
At the real operating temperature of the diodes:
it will be less by ?? -> 3% :-> [ even 6-7%, this is the case at higher operating temperatures ]
~3%
2,27 => 5000K
2,22 => 3500K
1:1 => 2,25 umol/J : system efficiency.
Without laboratory measurements, this is just a guess based on the data sheet. The parameters of the strips can be slightly colored upwards. Producers often do that.
You put diffusers on strips _ you additionally reduce the amount of available light by a few %.
Without (Ulbricht'a) integrating sphere _ and spectroradiometer, measuring it will be fun like I am doing. Determination of the distance losses depending on the wall coverage. this is easy - as is interpolation of the total efficiency of the source using a room-specific calibration curve. Assuming that the source is close to point. The problem is hardware grade _ TES1335 is grade B. + - 6% worst case.
I need this
Chinese producers of cheap panels show measurements made of it. Tes1335 is really better for white light.
SummaryKipp& Zonen model PQS 1, LI-CORmodels LI-190 and LI-190R, and Apogeemodel SQ-500quantum sensors had minimalspectral, directional, calibration, and stabilityerrors,and matched each other within about 4 %, suggestingthey can be reliably used for accurate photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD)measurement.Apogee model SQ-100 quantum sensors performed similarly, exceptwhen measuringsomeLEDs,where spectral errors can be large. SpectrumLightScout andActive Eye/HydrofarmLGBQM quantum sensors are not research-grade instruments and should be used with caution when making absolute PPFD measurements. The LightScout hadlarge spectral and calibration errors, and the LGBQM hadlarge spectral and directional errors. The LGBQM was also unstable under electric lights. While the LightScout and LGBQMare low cost, the large errors indicate they can only be used to provide a relative indication of PPFD withtime for a given radiationsource,