Nikola Tesla & Free Energy technology ..discovered around 100 years ago

[GoatCheese]

"If Gravity penetrates EVERYTHING, why isn't the universe ONE BIG mass of matter?!!"
The easiest and shortest answer is: because it's not the only force in the universe.
I read the links from the thread start and you can see my reaction in my first post in the thread. About the "proof" of reacting ether - I can't see anything because it says 403 Forbidden. I guess I'm a part of the conspiracy and it refuses to let me in and read
I couldn't quite understand what you mean when asking a physicist "and it ALLWAYS tries to fall into it's center FROM every possible direction ..understand?". Do I look so brainless as to not understand the basics of gravitation? Or maybe you think what you said is so complex that it's hard to understand?
2 + 2 = 4... understand?
Since my life is too short to answer such dumb questions, I'll leave you enjoying your way of understanding the universe. I just wish you happy learning. And the chance to see a working Bedini machine, not just a bunch of "working" equipment in a youtube video, nor a sci-fi paper, because you know how they call something that doesn't exist - a lie.
Peace

Well put.

 

[GoatCheese]

Sorry ...the doggy link was my bad ...now it works.


Nikola Tesla's Radiations and Cosmic Rays

http://www.andre-waser.ch/Publications/NikolaTeslasRadiationsAndCosmicRays.pdf

Peace.

 

[Bazarocka]

Snopes

Snopes

check out this out about your the 200 mile per gallon carburator myth


http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/carburetor.asp

CAN SUCK an egg my brother. I'd NOT take the word of some quacks (The Mikkelsons) over MY GRANDFATHERS, ever. ***watch where you go.

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/snopescom/

 

[yoss33]

I want to clarify that my critique is not aimed at Tesla. I very much respect what Tesla did for expanding our knowledge about electro-magnetism. But we have to remember that Tesla was an experimentator and inventor. He didn't make much success in explaining what he discovered. That's ok because he made most of his inventions at a time when the electron was not even discovered! So explaining the complex fenomena he observed was impossible for him. He made speculations, which later turned wrong, but he still deserves a lot of respect for being a pioneer in the study of compex electro-magnetic phenomena.
I have even more respect for his view to share his discoveries with the whole mankind without asking for profit - he was a true scientist and a human.
With that said, excuse my negative reactions to "theories" that want to "ride" on Tesla's fame.

 

[Centrum]

if this is true and it works.
The whole thing will be written off as a scam and everyone invovled will mysteriously disappear or die soon.




EDIT
the video itself is over two years old http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com...ome-generator-zero-point-energy-off-the-grid/
Thats the oldelst link i was able to find, so im assuming thos story is like 2 or 3 years old, and the machines where never made.
So where they a hoax ?



EDIT ___________________________________________________________

Okay i found more stuff, looks like they are selling them.
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Lutec1000/#Official_Website



http://www.rexresearch.com/christie/christie.htm

 

[bombadil.360]

Centrum, but this lutec machine does not run on aether. it runs with magnets that need to be impulsed and then the machine produces electricity very efficiently, but it does not draw it from aether as people here have been discussing...

I want to see a generator that has as a primal energy source the aether and/or cosmic rays as spoken by others...and that it does not need any other source of energy to get it going.


is this supposedly working Tesla Coil that this dude Chris Angel used for a trick, how does it work?

p1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgipNGS1hE

p2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV3etThWyXI

p3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRJysnUWgkY&feature=related



?

 

[ixnay007]

Free energy, whee!

Perpetual motion, whee!

P.T Barnum was right.

 

[TexasToker]

What i meant is; Einstein says Energy = mass and it is running out, whereas th 'Dynamic Ether' theory expalinsthe cosmos as 'perpetual energy machine'

E is relativistic energy. Not like electricity. Your attempt at deciphering Einstein's Theory is bunk. All he is saying is that mass has POTENTIAL energy. Energy always exhibits mass. Then if you go with the LAW of Conservation of Energy, saying that E (energy / mass) cannot be created or destroyed, you are saying that there is magic energy out there that we can run our house off of?

You can't just say a physical LAW is bunk. Who are you? Where are you published?

Oh and in case you want to go on about the cosmic energy blah blah...Einstein's theories were not just 'Earth' theories. Is the energy out there, sure...can we tap into it and use it yet? nope. Does that energy have mass? See Einstein's theory of relativity.

 

[ixnay007]

Sssh, you'll hurt his feelings.

 

[GoatCheese]

E is relativistic energy. Not like electricity. Your attempt at deciphering Einstein's Theory is bunk. All he is saying is that mass has POTENTIAL energy. Energy always exhibits mass. Then if you go with the LAW of Conservation of Energy, saying that E (energy / mass) cannot be created or destroyed, you are saying that there is magic energy out there that we can run our house off of?

You can't just say a physical LAW is bunk. Who are you? Where are you published?

Oh and in case you want to go on about the cosmic energy blah blah...Einstein's theories were not just 'Earth' theories. Is the energy out there, sure...can we tap into it and use it yet? nope. Does that energy have mass? See Einstein's theory of relativity.

Hey,


What relativists claim is that it is impossible to get "over unit- Energy" out of the enviroment (be it cosmic radiation energy, or hydrogen-based energy inventions ..) --->you get more 'units of energy' out of it, than you put in.

Now, the mass-electomagnet generator/motor on this SKY-news clip is one of the 'over a unit'-generators. The guys offer it to scientists to look, butit allways stops somewhere.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZZj5pbuWio ....now isf there is any Aussies reading this thread ...contact SKY news and try to contact THESE GUYS!!!! ...i'm vry, very, very interested on hearing how things would turn out

Google: Joseph Newman machine and watch the vids on him at youtube .. his motors was/is the "same" as the generator on that SKY-news clip. It is just built a little differently

Bedini machine was one ..and there are people building their own http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bedini+machine&search_type=&aq=f

GOOGLE: John Hutchison, the Canadian inventor has made mineral batteries that "never" run out, along with his other very interesting inventions...


More on the Ether-medium/energy..

Edited by Jim Glenn ]

SPACE FLOWING CURRENT​

Understanding the analogue between these electrical impulse effects and the behavior of high-pressure gases was of paramount importance. This gaseous aspect of impulse electrical radiance was perhaps the most mystifying aspect of these newfound energies. Those who sought out Tesla's every lecture were very aware that a new electrical species had been discovered.
While yet a student, Tesla had became aware of certain scientific imperatives enunciated by Johann von Goethe. One of these was the preservation and extension of all activities-natural. Goethe implied that when natural conditions were preserved during experimentation, then nature itself was in the best configuration to reveal more unified phenomenal exhibitions to qualitative observers.
Tesla recognized that his new discovery of impulse, the result of an accident, was a total departure from Polyphase alternating current. While his original vision of the vortex was applied by him to the designing of motors and generators, Tesla now realized that this was not its primary message. In fact, taken from the viewpoint, which Goethe expressed, Polyphase was a most unnatural form of energy.
Natural activity is suffused with impulses, not alternations. Natural activity is initiated as a primary impulse. Nature is flooded with impulses of all kinds. From lightning to nervous activities, all natural energy movements occur as impulses. Impulses were now seen by Tesla to fill the natural world. But, more fundamentally, Tesla saw that impulses flood the metaphysical world.
The mysterious flow of meanings during conversation occurs as a sequence of directed impulses in space. Though inert air vibrates in alternations with sounds uttered, the flow of meaning remains unidirectional. Intentions are also impulses. The unidirectional flow of intentions appear as impulses. Motivations proceed from the manifestation of sudden desires. Overtly expressed as actions, the initiating impulses are then fulfilled.
Tesla wished to comprehend where this "motivating force" came from, and where it went during the expressed actions. In all of this, he was very much the wonderful stereotype of the Victorian natural philosopher. His scientific pursuits followed these considerations until the last. Those who study his announcements recognize his metaphysical foundations, the basis of all his subsequent scientific quests.
Tesla observed the amazing "coordination" of new phenomena which daily seemed to bring new technological potentials before him. This wonderful synchronicity, this vortex, revealed his new and fortunate position in nature. Having somehow "broken" his fixation with the unnatural ... with Polyphase ... he reentered the natural once again. Impulses. Could it be that the induction of electrical impulses summoned the other impulse characteristics of nature? Was he producing a metaphysical vortex, into which all the impulse phenomena of nature would now flow? Was this the real sunset message, which seized him in Budapest, so many years ago? Was electricity the fundamental natural energy ... the motivator?
Victorian Science was not exactly sure what electricity was, there being so very many attributes associated with the term. Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century natural philosophers conjectured on the nature of both electric and magnetic forces. Gilbert and Descartes shared the belief that these forces were a special kind of "flowing charge", a space radiant stream which took place in tightly constricted lines. Some equated the electromagnetic forces with a "dark light", which Karl von Reichenbach later proved in part.
Faraday adopted and modified the view that electromagnetic forces acted through space because they were a special flow of charge. This effusive charge movement changed when traveling through conductors, becoming more densified and retarded in velocity. Faraday's "lines of force" were not conceived by him to be mere static tensions as modernists view them. Faraday envisioned these force lines as radiant, streaming lines. They were mobile, moving longitudinally into space.
Others would change the names, referring to electric force lines as "diaelectric" or dielectric flux, but the view remained essentially as conceived by Faraday. Young James Clerk Maxwell also believed that force lines were dynamic, longitudinal lines of flow. But flow-lines of what substance? Here lay the principle problem, which occupied physicists throughout the Victorian Era.
Victorian researchers and natural philosophers wished to discover the exact nature of the "flowing charge" of which force lines were composed. Most agreed that the mysterious flowing "substance" had to be an effusive, ultra-gaseous flux. This flux was composed of infinitesimal energy particles, which affected the various pressures and inductions, observed.
Henry and Faraday struggled with the idea of deriving usable electric power from static charges. The notions was that, since force-lines were made of a "flowing charge substance", then fixed contacts placed on charged masses would supply electrical power forever. No one was able, however, to derive this flowing charge. Lossy discharges preceded every contact. Most researchers, whose attempts with highly charged Leyden Jars failed, sought a more benign source of concentrated charge. The quest shifted to magnets, but the attempt remained as futile as ever. There remained no available way to derive power from the individual flowing charges of a force-line.
J.J. Thomson discovered electrons in vacuum discharges; assuming that these "electric particles" operated in all instances where electrical activity was observed. Victorian researchers did not accept this view completely. Thomson's "electrons" were viewed as the result of violent collisions across a vacuum acceleration space. It was not possible to ascertain whether these same "Thomson currents" were active within electrical conductors operating at small voltages.
Very reputable experimenters besides Tesla continued claiming that "space flowing electricity" is the real electricity. Tesla's classic demonstrations proved that rapid electrical impulses actually exceed the ability of fixed charges to transmit the applied forces. Charges lag where electrostatic forces continue propagating. One is compelled to see that electrostatic forces precede the movement of charges.
Tesla saw that electrostatic impulses could flow without line charges. His "zero current coils" operated simply because the charges themselves were immobilized. Electricity was shown to be more in the nature of a flowing force rather than a stream of massive particles. But what then was this "flowing current"?
In Tesla's view, radiant electricity is a space flowing current, which is NOT made of electrons. Later Victorians believed that there was a substance, which both filled all space and permeated all matter. Several serious researchers claimed to have identified this gas. Notables, such as Mendeleev predicted the existence of several ultra-rare gases, which preceded hydrogen. These, he claimed, were inert gases. This is why they were rarely detected. The inert gases, which Mendeleev predicted, formed an atmosphere, which flooded all of space. These gaseous mixtures composed the Aether.
Tesla and others believed that both electrical and magnetic forces were actually streams of Aether gas, which had been fixated in matter. Materials were somehow "polarized" by various "frictive" treatments by which an Aether gas flow was induced in them. Most materials could maintain the flow indefinitely, since no work was required on their part. Matter had only to remain polarized, transducing the Aether flow. The Aether gas contained all the power. Unlimited power.
This Aether gas power manifested as the electromagnetic forces themselves, adequate reason to pursue the development of an Aether gas engine. Such an engine could run forever on the eternal kinetic energies of the Aether itself, it being both generated and driven by the stars.
Tesla believed that radiant electricity is composed of Aether gas. He based this belief on the fact that his zero current coils were not conducting the "slow and dense" charges usually observed in ordinary electrical circuits. Abrupt impulses produced distinctive and different effects ... fluidic effects. The qualities ascribed by Tesla to "electricity" or things "electrical" in his numerous patent texts and press interviews are those, which refer to the Aether gas. Tesla did not refer to electron currents as "electricity". He did not equate "electricity" with electron flow. Whenever Tesla spoke of "electrical" effects he always described their effusive, gaseous quality.
Tesla referred to space as the "ambient or natural medium". Space, he claimed, was that which "conducts electricity". He had found a means by which this gaseous electrical flow could be greatly concentrated, magnified, and directed. He saw that this radiant electricity was, in reality, a gaseous emanation. An Aetheric emanation. This is why he made constant reference to fluidic terminology throughout his lectures.
Resistance, volume, capacity, reservoir, surface area, tension, pressure, pressure release: these were the terms upon which Tesla relied throughout his presentations. The terminology of hydraulics. Tesla also recognized that because Aether was a gas, it had aerodynamic requirements.
Aether, in Tesla's lexicon, was space flowing electricity: a gas of superlative and transcendent qualities. Aether was the electricity, which filled all of space, a vast reservoir of unsurpassable power. Motive, dynamic, and free for the taking. Aether gas technology would revolutionize the world. Aether gas engines would provide an eternal power source for the world. Science, industry, corporations, financial alignments, social orders, nations ... everything would change.
http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/tesla.htm

I have to point out again that i'm only a layman when it comes to elecrtical engineering ..sure, i have assembled the grow room equipment that i have, and "built" grow lights etc ... and done some soldering in my time ..and i have degree/papres on welding ( had a masters(?) on one welding-style, but it should be re-newed now ) and i have also worked as a welder tig/mig for awhile (not anymore) ..so i do understand about engineering and hoe thingds work...
but my lingo may not allways be that fancy or accurate ...but gladly you guys are not too hot either, LOL!!


Laters, amigos ...i'll try to get my ass around that Tesla's free energy applications piece i promised ..haven't even started it yet, but i get there ..like it is a big task, but lazy-bones..

 

[anikas88]

truth is that, it is possible, but it wont be pursued. several large corporations and straw men individuals hold most of the patents needed to get this working, but it would take several engineers and physicists, to work on this, maybe for years. Who is going to pay for them? why would an engineer waste years of his life working of this if he can get a job with an electrical company that pays him well. I dont hero worship but tesla was one of the brightest minds in last 100 years or so. as to the anti conspiracy skeptics, all i would have to say is that look at cannabis. There was a conspiracy by this government and business to try to eliminate it from earth. but the masses kept it going, cannabis won, the drug war is a failure. So to will the masses get free energy but it not without oppression and lies. There is a documentary on how electrical companies funded greenpeace and other environmentalists to attack nuclear power, because they feared a proliferation of nuclear plants, as they thought it would make electricity cheaper to produce. The energy sources they want to harness is any type that keeps them in business and rich. Why is there not a drive to bring more solar panels down in price and to be more efficient?

 

[GoatCheese]

truth is that, it is possible, but it wont be pursued. several large corporations and straw men individuals hold most of the patents needed to get this working, but it would take several engineers and physicists, to work on this, maybe for years. Who is going to pay for them? why would an engineer waste years of his life working of this if he can get a job with an electrical company that pays him well. I dont hero worship but tesla was one of the brightest minds in last 100 years or so. as to the anti conspiracy skeptics, all i would have to say is that look at cannabis. There was a conspiracy by this government and business to try to eliminate it from earth. but the masses kept it going, cannabis won, the drug war is a failure. So to will the masses get free energy but it not without oppression and lies. There is a documentary on how electrical companies funded greenpeace and other environmentalists to attack nuclear power, because they feared a proliferation of nuclear plants, as they thought it would make electricity cheaper to produce. The energy sources they want to harness is any type that keeps them in business and rich. Why is there not a drive to bring more solar panels down in price and to be more efficient?

The beatiful thing is ...people all ready build these machines ...many "living-room scientist-engineer-invetors" but also more serious engineers

..so now the Corparations are actually trying to keep the lid on, while the water is boiling like mad!!

...you don't need a patent to get Ether electricity, NO!! ..you need to build the MACHINE for that!! LOL ..you can get the patent afterwards.


..but patent offices are run BY big corporations, so this is why all the important work gets burried under bureucracy ...and this is criminal.



Problem with solar panels is the materials are still (very) ineffective ...the amount of electricity you get out of these panels out there on markets today isn't that "good" ..not that i'm dissin solar power. no ...and my salute to people using this ..but if you ask them about this what i just wrote, they'll prolly tell you i was right with my comment.

...and the "best" materials for these panels are also controled by the BIG corporations (over pricing them etc., see..)



But... "...the times they are a changing"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrVkEKcSoFE


Have a nice one.

 

[mandingo]

Hey,


What relativists claim is that it is impossible to get "over unit- Energy" out of the enviroment (be it cosmic radiation energy, or hydrogen-based energy inventions ..) --->you get more 'units of energy' out of it, than you put in.

:

No you cannot get more than you put in. There is no 100% efficient engine which wil convert energy from one form to another. Basic conservation of energy theory from Newton.

Patents are not run by anyone. The Americans have theirs and the rest of the world have theirs also. Anybody can look at those and file them. Corporations just have more clout in holding on to 'original ideas' once patented - fair enough.

Nobody has a monopoly on science.

I like the Ether theories I think they are becoming popular again - all this dark matter in the vacuum. I liked Tesla because he hated Einstein's theory on folding space. How can you fold a vacuum Tesla thought... I kinda agree with Tesla but he never came up with a way to explain gravity using ether.

The oil companies are not stopping anyone from looking into alternative energy sources. The folks who are building solar panel systems these days are the folks who build semiconductor manufacturing equipment. These guys are experts in Materials Science. They ain't run by the any government.

Solar may be ineffective, less efficient than a coal or nuclear steam turbine electricity generator but once you lower the manufacturing costs and look at the 'big' picture/long term benefits then it will be worthwhile.

The current environment is not really suited to the long term. People are greedy and think for the now. I think we are developing too fast too realise we need to change.

 

[yoss33]

I agree with mandingo on every sentence in his post.
When criticizing big companies, you should realise that there are a lot of VERY RICH companies who don't make profit from current energy status-quo, and these companies, of course, want to take a part of the pie too. You think the oil companies control Google, Sony, Samsung,....? You think they control the chinese government?
Nobody can stop science. Even with propaganda.
The comparison with cannabis prohibition is quite incorrect. The prohibition works with laws, it is enforced by the law. On the other side, we are all free to do whatever science we want (unless it's about drugs ). And while the prohibition feeds on the bad effects of drugs, what can stop a machine that generates energy? It's all good.

 

[NiteTiger]

Ok, I've kind of avoided this debate, lest a snide comment, because views on Tesla's ideas and their practical efficiency are highly subjective.

You can claim this is is so for whatever reason you want. Tesla couldn't develop his theories because of greed, whatever. The point is the Tesla's experiments did not get incubated, and refined, and that has left us with questions to be answered.

the reasons these questions aren't answered may be explained easily, or with great complexity, but the simple fact is it didn't get its 'fair chance'

That being said, there are some points I strongly disagree with, that I felt I should speak to:

Patents are not run by anyone. The Americans have theirs and the rest of the world have theirs also. Anybody can look at those and file them. Corporations just have more clout in holding on to 'original ideas' once patented - fair enough.

I agree with this, and quote it merely for the relevance of the next quote.

Nobody has a monopoly on science.

This is patently false. As quoted above, corporations defend their patents with a tenacity that pit bulls would envy. The courts are the least of their methods.

An energy provider potentially has billions to lose if a cheaper alternate source is discovered. Why would you think it would not be willing to spend hundreds of millions (or more) dollars to bury competition?

True, under anti-trust laws, you may have some lawsuits, but how much good did that do to Netscape in the browser wars? Sure, they won the anti-trust suit, but it was a Pyrrhic victory. What's the market share of Netscape currently? Yeah...exactly.

How many scientists, who have been scrabbling for funding for their research, constantly investor hunting, are going to turn down a 200M+ buyout?

Especially when that comes with a 7 figure salary for carrying on your research.

Poof! For under 300M, Exxon has halted a competitive energy source. They make that in under an hour, if not quicker. No anti-trust bullshit, no shenanigans, just a straight out deal. In fact, Exxon can now trumpet it's commitment and dedication to supporting green energy.

Just like that, your potential for 50%+ efficiency solar cells is gone.

Not only is it happening, it is actually a damn good business practice. Just ask Microsoft.

Then think about how many people you could find that for a just a few thousand dollars would be willing to take care of that problem in a more final manner. Then think about the impact these new energy sources would have on the economies in the middle east. You know, the same region that produces suicide bombers?

Sound crazy? Take a look at hydrogen fuel cells for cars, see if the death of one of the scientists by food poisoning doesn't strike you as odd. Especially when you realize 6 others in his party ate the same dish with no ill effects. Three days after he'd rejected an offer to buy out his lab. Which coincidentally burned shortly after his death.

They ain't run by the any government.

The guy suppressing this technology don't have squat to care about government except for how many pols it can get on junket to Jamaica.

In addition, before you discount government involvement, think about the shakeups in a national economy dependent on oil and its related industries. How much is the US willing to spend to protect the auto industry? How many billions was that bail out again?

Solar may be ineffective, less efficient than a coal or nuclear steam turbine electricity generator but once you lower the manufacturing costs and look at the 'big' picture/long term benefits then it will be worthwhile.

Nuclear is the greenest source currently available, and at far less expense and risk of a dedicated manufacturing facility for crap efficiency solar panels. There is your investment potential.

The problem is getting the funding to invest in those specialized manufacturing facilities. You'd need a billion plus to secure a manufacturing foothold. Where would that money come from, do you think? And if it does come from a source independent of big oil, do they have the resources to fight the battle beyond that point, compared to the most profitable business enterprise in the world?

The current environment is not really suited to the long term. People are greedy and think for the now. I think we are developing too fast too realise we need to change.

So you knew the fallacy of your argument all along

 

[mandingo]

Sure coorporations defend their patents. You have a clever idea then by right you should have a 'edge' over competition in the marketplace or they should pay you if they want to make fruits from your intellectual labours to make money That's the whole point of the patents system.

Its not regulating science its regulating commerce from ideas.

Fuck all to do with science. Its not about putting other stuff down, its about making money from ideas. So, corporations do not put others down. They just control the market via patents.

If you come up with a perpetual energy machine and market it on ebay and sell it to folks. Good for you. You're working outside the system and kicking ass. Please just show me the theory behind it. Share it to the world.

Dude those guys building and researcing solar tech don't need government funding. Leave government funding for weapons tech.

I don't see how any government, institution can have a monopoly on Science.
Sure they have more money to throw at a problem to try and solve it but if you look at the great ideas that have come from human society - none have really come from big government - unless you are talking about weapons of mass destructon

 

[mandingo]

editted to add:

I do see the fallacy, sort of in a hazy mist. I don't think i had a arguement though

 

[yoss33]

Call me naive, but I don't believe that big companies assasin enemies.
Killing someone means that the people on top of that company take the risk of a revenge or punishment. For all their life afterwards. I don't believe any millioneer wants this - all he wants is to spend his millions in peace. Those of them that don't mind living in fear respectively live the much more interesting (challenging but rewarding) life of a criminal boss.

 

[Bazarocka]

I just wanted to add to this thread. Did you know, their getting (The Power Companys) your money even When EVERY APPLIANCE and LIGHT fixture is turned off and your fast asleep in bed. Yea I know what your saying, but we have to have the ac/heat, the fridge or whatever. THAT'S not what Im talking about.

I'll give you all an example. Lets use a printer, most of us have one. The printer is plugged into the wall AND the printer is POWERED down, turned off. HOWEVER if you'll notice, there's usually one or more leds lit up,,,,yes. Its not much, but it DOES take POWER to power that light. So the power light is one, and then the other is ALL to well known. THE CLOCK,,,,,,,,,oh yes I FORGOT, we need the clock to set our equipment, our coffeepots, or whatever. (BULLSHIT)

Look around got a rucking clock on everything,,stove,fridge,coffeepot,stereo amp,cable box, satellite box,T.V, Residential Alarm, Humidifier, AC Unit, Heater, Thermostat.

That fricking clock and those little power lights are going 24/7, 365 days a year, using residual power. Now to just you and me that's NOT MUCH. But multiple that by 295,469,285 households. Get The Pic
(ITSALLABOUTPOWERANDGREED)

 

[GoatCheese]

No you cannot get more than you put in. There is no 100% efficient engine which wil convert energy from one form to another. Basic conservation of energy theory from Newton.

Patents are not run by anyone. The Americans have theirs and the rest of the world have theirs also. Anybody can look at those and file them. Corporations just have more clout in holding on to 'original ideas' once patented - fair enough.

Nobody has a monopoly on science.

I like the Ether theories I think they are becoming popular again - all this dark matter in the vacuum. I liked Tesla because he hated Einstein's theory on folding space. How can you fold a vacuum Tesla thought... I kinda agree with Tesla but he never came up with a way to explain gravity using ether.

The oil companies are not stopping anyone from looking into alternative energy sources. The folks who are building solar panel systems these days are the folks who build semiconductor manufacturing equipment. These guys are experts in Materials Science. They ain't run by the any government.

Solar may be ineffective, less efficient than a coal or nuclear steam turbine electricity generator but once you lower the manufacturing costs and look at the 'big' picture/long term benefits then it will be worthwhile.

The current environment is not really suited to the long term. People are greedy and think for the now. I think we are developing too fast too realise we need to change.

When did Sir Isaac Newton live? ...can you start living closer to Now? ..you know, bro


Our "laws of physics" change as we get to know more ...but the Physics of the Cosmos have all this time been the same, right?



"over a unit"-consept is not my invention.
Check out what Joe Newman had to say about 'over-a-unit'-generators, and how this kinda 'over-a-unit-device really works, and what the term/consept means.

..check out his motor/generators at Yuotube ..and how he was screwed over by the gov. scientists.


Peace.