It's funny how the Patsies thought they could just start some video feature on their website and they could use that as an excuse to get away with anything. Maybe they can - it's up to Rog.
IL was supposed to have defense, and not be like the prior IL teams whose reputation had made this years team a good value going 8-3 ATS, and they got 29 put up on them. Northwestern didn't score more than 22 all year except UNLV and UMass at home. Their average final score to that point was 15-25.
I haven't kept good track of my bets or winnings except for a pile of losing tickets. I still have a small stack to play even though some went to 4 months of groceries and all. College games did better for me though, when I didn't do stupid things.
So, Indy. For value, you need a good QB and coach, not just an underdog no one is picking. For risk management, you need to not make stupid plays. That one stupid play a week is the difference between winning and losing. I've known this for a while having made every stupid mistake there is, it's enforcing the rules that's the problem. Usually I'd look at the final scores for each team the last 4-5 games, make a couple adjustments, because that tends to give a more correct outcome. Didn't do that last week, takes a while without a spreadsheet and records that a half-ass should have.
Kirk Cousins on MNF AGAIN? He just went to 0-8 last week.
SF better win this week.
Cause u know, theyre still kind of a sucky team, especially without their starting QB.
IL was supposed to have defense, and not be like the prior IL teams whose reputation had made this years team a good value going 8-3 ATS, and they got 29 put up on them. Northwestern didn't score more than 22 all year except UNLV and UMass at home. Their average final score to that point was 15-25.
I haven't kept good track of my bets or winnings except for a pile of losing tickets. I still have a small stack to play even though some went to 4 months of groceries and all. College games did better for me though, when I didn't do stupid things.
So, Indy. For value, you need a good QB and coach, not just an underdog no one is picking. For risk management, you need to not make stupid plays. That one stupid play a week is the difference between winning and losing. I've known this for a while having made every stupid mistake there is, it's enforcing the rules that's the problem. Usually I'd look at the final scores for each team the last 4-5 games, make a couple adjustments, because that tends to give a more correct outcome. Didn't do that last week, takes a while without a spreadsheet and records that a half-ass should have.
Kirk Cousins on MNF AGAIN? He just went to 0-8 last week.
SF better win this week.