thats a lot of people. wonder what they will doIt does seem like those that work with collectives on a small scale are going to be drowned in red tape.
thats a lot of people. wonder what they will doIt does seem like those that work with collectives on a small scale are going to be drowned in red tape.
most personal doctors will not prescribe marijuana even for folks like me with real issues..my own doctor will not prescribe marijuana nor will any of my specialists..i have a real need and an ailment or 2 listed in the original prop 215 list ...I was looking at websites with info on AB 266 and came across California State Senate Bill 643. I'm not certain how these two relate, but my impression is that the senate bill is what is being worked on as the final document.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0601-0650/sb_643_bill_20150406_amended_sen_v98.pdf
They're trying to get rid of the "pot doctors" and require you to use your personal physician for a medical marijuana recommendation. in what can and can't be done. If passed the medical market will be tightly regulated but not in an overly onerous way. But the "wild west" days will be over.
. No collectives though.
They are offering multiple licenses based on canopy size. This seems to be a good thing. What's the problem with this bill?
I've probably already said this but Jerry Brown is anti cannabis. He doesn't believe in medical either. I don't like how he looks down on us and he will screw us . Unless there is a strong reason for him to back us where it is to his advantage somehow just sayin looks like we need to focus on 2016 legalization . No Dr from Kaiser will write a rec so let's hope that doesn't change
I read on SF gate, that it will go into effect in 2017, giving voters a chance to vote on something else.
I just googled ab266, and read it at sfgate, couldn't figure out how to link it...