What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

New High Times texas article?

motaco

Old School Cottonmouth
Veteran
I was just wondering if any of you guys saw the new high times texas article.

I have never really seen a weed mag do a southern ganja article before.

I was just wondering if it was any good. also if it was dealing with southern or texas strains like mexican sativas or if the texas harvest festival or whatever they were going there for just looked like the same old boring northern lights and diesels etc, or more interesting strains.
 

Mr. Freeman

just a fellow cannabis smoker, vaper, cooker and r
ICMag Donor
I saw it man. See, we got things in common. Don't be mad cause I corrected you.

I wouldn't go to no bud bonanza without knowing anybody, especially in Texas. Heres a list of the strains they took:

Sensi White russian
steambud
westside widow
blue widow
white russian
shoreline
sensi hashplant
alaskan hashplant
garlic
purple
grass monkey
snocap
afghan skink
stinky pinky
blue widow

I've only heard of few on that list.

Peace
 
Last edited:

shroomie_glen

New member
Yeah, i read it too. I thought it was REALLY generic. The names of the strains were better sounding than the strains looked, imo. Almost as if like 6 of them were BARELY noticable different phenotypes. In fact several of the buds looked practically the same, however i didnt sample them, so i can't speak upon how truly diferent they were to the palette or stone. But if you look in the mag, several look almost exactly the same. I mean, i have had one plant produce very different looking/smelling/tasting buds because of several factors. ie:upper and lower buds that recieved different amounts of light, different harvest times as they mature, or nutrient depletion, etc.
-Shroomie_glen-
 
Last edited:

SBP

Member
article seemed generic

article seemed generic

this article seems like a recycled article from the past about a new up and coming smoke haven... yeah, the article wasnt very spot on. some of the buds looked good, but i've never heard of 85% of the stuff that was listed. even that shoreline don't look like shoreline, it looked like some commercial canadian work-weed

pretty disappointed
 
G

Guest

bottom line is...if your growing dank buds chances are you don't give a fuck about weak ass high times commercial ass magazine...and if you gotta brag to them about how good the dank is...it aint dank...step ya game up...
 

Mr. Freeman

just a fellow cannabis smoker, vaper, cooker and r
ICMag Donor
Hey man, why you bashing on high times. Its what got me growing back when I was 15. Some of they're articles are crap. But hey, thanks to them I learned how to get beans.

I am grwing dank buds. And I will always buy hightimes. Just cause I can.


Peace
 
kk is just saying that if your throwing down you already know your shit is better than what you see in high times. the way texas folk do it would blow HT out of the water.

but i still do love me some HT
 

SBP

Member
70's, aye wat kind of strain is that??? wats the bloom time, smell, flavor.... dat ish looks delicious
 

ibtokin

Member
those pics from 70s are of abusive og, which he did an awesome job on i might add. not only great buds, but great picture skills as well. flower time is around 9-10 weeks i believe on the abusive
 

Ganico

Active member
Veteran
k1llakr0n said:
indicas suck sativas in tx here buddy


Haha, yeah indicas do suck. I mean, that is what you're saying right?

Sativas seem to outperform indicas here, and we ain't nowhere as far south as TX, so I was kinda wondering why the fuck Texans would be growing indicas,haha
 

Pimpslapped

Member
Ganico said:
Haha, yeah indicas do suck. I mean, that is what you're saying right?

Sativas seem to outperform indicas here, and we ain't nowhere as far south as TX, so I was kinda wondering why the fuck Texans would be growing indicas,haha

That's 'cause EVERYONE knows that Indica gives more bud than Sativa. No matter where you grow it... therefor Indica > Sativa! DUH! At least it seems to me that too many people have that attitude.
 

Steaks

Member
pimpslapped---very true, some people just choose to remain ignorant. While i love me a good knockout stone, id much rather have a soaring plane high high :) People who say sativas suck either have never smoked a real sativa, or are morons.
 

Pimpslapped

Member
Pink said:
Steaks,

Some people are very sensitive to the paranoia of sativas and are not ignorant. :)

But in that case, would they say that 'Sativas Suck', or that THEY don't like Sativas? Personally, even if the style of the high were not to my taste, I wouldn't necessarily say that the smoke was bad, just not for me.
 
G

Guest

yep

yep

k1llakr0n said:
bottom line is...if your growing dank buds chances are you don't give a fuck about weak ass high times commercial ass magazine...and if you gotta brag to them about how good the dank is...it aint dank...step ya game up...
ditto .........
 
G

Guest

wrong...
Pimpslapped said:
That's 'cause EVERYONE knows that Indica gives more bud than Sativa. No matter where you grow it... therefor Indica > Sativa! DUH! At least it seems to me that too many people have that attitude.
sativa





indica




which do you think yielded more
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top