I've got no dog in that hunt but if I did I would realize that without tissue analysis my hypothesis would have little merit.
So no lab testing indicating azadirachtin levels?
For the purposes of this analysis, we consider samples to be in violation of EPA guidelines if they have greater than 100 ppb of any pesticide in Table 1 with the exception of azadirachtin and piperonyl butoxide (PBO). Azadirachtin is a naturally occurring compound found in Neem seeds, has low toxicity and according to 40CFR 180.905 is exempt from EPA tolerances. Detections of azadirachtin were therefore omitted from this analysis.
Such a lame response. If anyone would care to contribute something worthwhile, I'll be happy to work with it.I've got no dog in that hunt but if I did I would realize that without tissue analysis my hypothesis would have little merit.
Such a lame response. If anyone would care to contribute something worthwhile, I'll be happy to work with it.
Such a lame response. If anyone would care to contribute something worthwhile, I'll be happy to work with it.
Such a lame response. If anyone would care to contribute something worthwhile, I'll be happy to work with it.
Lol... Yeah okay... as opposed to someone who seems incapable of contributing anything other obfuscation and endless transparent logical fallacies...
Both subjects have been endlessly discussed prior. It's already known I don't have access to lab results. It's already known the double blind study I set up did not happen. They're simply being a dick about it, in lieu of adding actual content.DC: that's a pretty dick response and i hope people don't dismiss information you bring just because because you were a dick.
All microbe was saying is if you really want people to take your work seriously, the next step is getting tissue samples and doing double blind studies.
You're completely correct. There are no studies and this community does have a lot of anecdotal science integrated with it.At the same time everyone, how many studies have really been done like this on cannabis. We accept alot as fact with just a theory that sounds good, and a few observations and experiences that back it up.
Indeed, there are straight up cannabinoid CHS sufferers along with CVS sufferers from cancer, gall bladder or other issues. Do you still have CHS issues, or use cannabis?I had CHS symptoms for years, and i never used neem. I know CHS isn't just neem poisoning. Maybe some cases probably are though.
I would agree with this as well. Considering I've used cannabis only lightly contaminated with neem/aza, and only had mild reactions, I would say it may be possible to use it on mums and clones. I'm actually going to test it for my own use, since I now seem to live where gnats and thrips seem ever present.To think you can use neem in any application, at any rate, and at any time is just silly. Aza is a pesticide! There is probably a safe way to use it, but it probably needs to be used more conservatively then it is.
I feel the same way with neem as a spray and being an oil. There are cleaner and less expensive choices which do not leave a residue. Other than marketing efforts, why is it used so much?If there is some evidence that aza can be toxic, do we really need to put it in our soil? There are plenty of other amendments that can provide the same NPK at a lower cost.
Personally, I use Bt bits, mosquito dunks type gnat control. I have a lot of plants around the house in soil, and only a few of them are cannabis. lol I've only really used aza for mites.And what does neem meal in your soil kill? It won't kill root aphids. Is it just mostly for gnats? Are gnats that bad and unstoppable? Just proper watering prevents them.
When the testing was done, lab tests were not available to the general public. Even now there are very few labs which do public testing, I don't even know any by name.DC Why don't you have access to lab testing?
Correct. I had grown for years previously without changing anything but npk/micros. Anything grown the same way as before didn't cause any problems. I had clean cannabis from a previous run, the test run had treated plants specifically to test the my theory.Was your only way test for or assume the continued presence of 'azo' the effects upon the user?
I apologize if this has been addressed. When I requested the parameters of your trial/study I believe you only posted a brief summary.
If there are details somewhere else please point me in the correct direction.
Correct. I had grown for years previously without changing anything but npk/micros. Anything grown the same way as before didn't cause any problems. I had clean cannabis from a previous run, the test run had treated plants specifically to test the my theory.
Treated plants gave me the same issue as dispensary cannabis and cannabis grown by growers known to be using neem/aza products. Non-treated plants caused me zero CHS symptoms. It was a no-brainer to see I have issues with Aza.
I have continued to use large quantities of cannabis daily, for years afterward. Just as I was able to do so for years before the "aza years" with me.
My apologies, I do not have a formal write up of the testing.
Though I have not checked them all, the ones I have are licensed producers only.Don't they have legal labs in Co?...surely they must.
I have, and the only medications I take are cannabis and some tylenol when the pain gets really bad. It's a good question, since many people are on prescription medications. Some prescriptions (I'd have to go back and look) cover up the symptoms of CHS.Howdy y'all...I think one thing I haven't seen mentioned is drug interactions. Have you taken this into account Douglas?