What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Nature's Wonder Drug Curbed by Illuminati

itisme

Active member
Veteran
weird thing about those cards..
they were from like the '90s if i remember correctly?

1994/5 I think.....The first too have to be creepy and that dude looks a little familiar too.
 

sso

Active member
Veteran
well, i have to say, that ron paul reminds me of busts of julius caesar, he´s got some nice qualities,most do, but i wonder what his Real policies on War are.. and there is something about him that i dont like.

frankly i also have to say, that i really doubt any change for good president is ever gonna come near power. the board is simply set up that way..


and lost, i also thought that with icke, talking about the lizard brain, it came to mind anyway, but then again, he Never comes out and actually says that?

i dont remember him either saying that the lizard people are real.. just showing people that do. might be wrong on that nonrememberance?


i still wonder why he came out on that tvshow and claimed himself the messiah returned, i wonder for what reasons and if he still thinks the same?
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
frankly i also have to say, that i really doubt any change for good president is ever gonna come near power. the board is simply set up that way..

If good people sit around and do nothing then we are doomed. Do something.
 
Last edited:

sso

Active member
Veteran
the thing is, our society is basically "all for the money and fuck the rest"


which means, that everything, Everything, happens because of money.

(though actually at the upper levels, its all about the power)

(which means that, basically, people are killing eachother to get to boss one another around)

the ratrace and the "who´s the boss show.."

what a pathetic people we are..

that we allow the lunatics to boss us around.

all in hope of a carrot (or to become a minor boss (housenigger or at best overseer)) (and i only use the term nigger because it fits the situation, in this silly game we got going, its either slaves of the field, houseniggers (usually white actually) or overseer, the rests is Lords (with whom in satans throne, well who knows. maybe that battle is still not done.)
 

sso

Active member
Veteran
If good people sit around and do nothing then we are doomed.

well, if good people stopped participating, then the government would fall apart.

stopped paying taxes and just ignored those fools in the big house.

and started our own thing.

completely bloodless and nothing done, except doing our own thing.


trusting the government, well, its like blowing off your own leg and then deciding to blow it up again in the hopes of the leg growing back..
 

lost in a sea

Lifer
Veteran
Definitions you never knew:

ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.

ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.

REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4 A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.

INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc.

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises.

PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however defective. – A Dictionary of Law 1893.

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2 Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
 

juggo

Member
Itisme,

Sign me up, i want to play illuminati,where can i purchase it.Prolly make a million if ya made a video game out of it.I expect royalties.Please share some more cards.Thank you.

peace,
juggo
 

lost in a sea

Lifer
Veteran
The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple

This is not a mere child’s story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does “Oz” stand for? Ounces.Gold What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense.

What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He’s the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He’s the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of “official” recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He’s just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.

What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren’t real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means “in total, all together; Latin in toto.” Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard’s theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain – the court - (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about.Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard’s power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard’s game was up. It’s too bad that people don’t realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?

Let’s not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold.

What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only “in toto,” working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God’s Law.
 

juggo

Member
Hello,

Great point,the Wizard of Oz.I have done a bit of research on losts' topics.Its right there in your face and noone sees it,a "cult" classic, as it were.They,oops did i say they?Sorry."These guys" make it so obvious,that.....nevermind.Thank you.

peace,
juggo
 

foomar

Luddite
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Have met him twice , shook his hand , and respectfully argued with him.
He has worked hard , face to face at numerous lectures/book signings before the internet made it easy , anything that makes people think is better than nothing.

He owes much to his exposure in the tabloid press , owned by Murdock , who would make most lists of evil peeps.

I know a similar thread on a politics or theological forum would be dead within ten posts , remarkable this has survived so long given the strength of feeling.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
Sso
Saw your same post in the run Paul thread...
How can you say the only war candidate would cause war?
Am I just missing sarcasm?
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
well, if good people stopped participating, then the government would fall apart.

stopped paying taxes and just ignored those fools in the big house.

and started our own thing.

completely bloodless and nothing done, except doing our own thing.


trusting the government, well, its like blowing off your own leg and then deciding to blow it up again in the hopes of the leg growing back..

I hear that....Support your local farmer's supply, butchers, banks, & such....Is a start....Then you infiltrate the same positions as the people screwing us over....It starts with each individual, supporting local complanies, and changing local Gov't.

I went shopping today since my local meat market would had been shut tomorrow. PEACE.

You trust the Gov't only as far as you can kick them...
 

foomar

Luddite
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Here is a different interpretation , based on the same evidence.



BBC NEWS | Magazine | Secrets of the Wizard of Oz

By Rumeana Jahangir

BBC News

The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is one of the world's best-loved fairytales. As Judy
Garland's famous film nears its 70th birthday, how much do its followers know
about the story's use as an economic parable?

Dorothy in Kansas conjures up nostalgic thoughts of childhood Christmases hiding
behind the sofa from the Wicked Witch of the West. Or those flying monkeys.
It's unlikely its young fans will have been thinking about deflation and
monetary policy.
But the story has underlying economic and political references that make it a
popular tool for teaching university and high school students - mainly in the
United States but also in the UK - about the economic depression of the late
19th Century.
At a time when some economists fear an onset of deflation, and economic
certainties melt away like a drenched wicked witch, what can be learnt from Oz?
The 1939 film starring a young Judy Garland was based on Lyman Frank Baum's
book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, published in 1900. It told of an orphaned
Kansas girl swept by a tornado into a fantastical world, but who wants to return
home to her aunt and uncle.
Thinking the great Wizard of Oz can grant her wish, she sets out to meet him
with her beloved dog, Toto, joined by a scarecrow, a tin woodman and a lion.
Baum published the book in 1900, just after the US emerged from a period of
deflation and depression. Prices had fallen by about 22% over the previous 16
years, causing huge debt.

Farmers were among those badly affected, and the Populist political party was
set up to represent their interests and those of industrial labourers.
The US was then operating on the gold standard - a monetary system which valued
the dollar according to the quantity of gold. The Populists wanted silver, along
with gold, to be used for money. This would have increased the US money supply,
raised price levels and reduced farmers' debt burdens.


Yellow brick code

In 1964, high school teacher Henry Littlefield wrote an article outlining the
notion of an underlying allegory in Baum's book. He said it offered a "gentle
and friendly" critique of Populist thinking, and the story could be used to
illuminate the late 19th Century to students.
Since its publication, teachers have used this take on the tale to help classes
understand the issues of the era.

SYMBOLISM OF CHARACTERS

Dorothy: Everyman American
Scarecrow: Farmer
Tin Woodman: Industrial worker
Lion: William Jennings Bryan, politician who backed silver cause
Wizard of Oz: US presidents of late 19th Century
Wicked Witch: A malign Nature, destroyed by the farmers' most precious
commodity, water. Or simply the American West
Winged Monkeys: Native Americans or Chinese railroad workers, exploited by West
Oz: An abbreviation of 'ounce' or, as Baum claimed, taken from the O-Z of a
filing cabinet?
Emerald City: Greenback paper money, exposed as fraud
Munchkins: Ordinary citizens

And Littlefield's theory has been hotly debated. He believed the characters
could represent the personalities and themes of the late 1800s,with Dorothy
embodying the everyman American spirit.

US political historian Quentin Taylor, who supports this interpretation, says:
"There are too many instances of parallels with the political events of the
time.
"The Tin Woodman represents the industrial worker, the Scarecrow is the farmer
and the Cowardly Lion is William Jennings Bryan."

Bryan was a Democratic presidential candidate who supported the silver cause.
But he failed to win votes from eastern workers and lost the 1896 election. In
the same way, the Lion's claws are nearly blunted by the Woodman's metallic
shell.

The Wicked Witch of the West is associated with a variety of controversial
personalities, chief among them the industrialist Mark Hanna, campaign manager
to President William McKinley.

In this scenario, the yellow brick road symbolises the gold standard, the
Emerald City becomes Washington DC and the Great Wizard characterises the
president - and he is exposed as being less than truthful.


Off to see the President

Yet none can help Dorothy return home. Eventually she discovers that her silver
shoes (changed to ruby for the film) have the power to take her back to Kansas.
The possible implication is that gold alone cannot be the solution for the
problems facing the average citizen. But Professor Taylor thinks it's unlikely
the book took sides. Instead he says it was merely explaining the story of the
Populist movement, some of whom marched on Washington DC in 1894 to demand
government improve their plight.

Their demand for the use of silver with the gold standard was not met, although
within a few years, inflation returned after discoveries of gold in South Africa
and other parts of the world.
In Baum's story, Dorothy loses her silver slippers in the desert before she
reaches home - a possible reflection of the decline of the silver cause after
1896
.
But not everyone believes The Wonderful Wizard of Oz includes any hidden
meanings.

"Nobody ever suggested it until 1964," says Bradley Hansen, who is a professor
of economics at the University of Mary Washington.
"There's no solid evidence that Baum had written it as a monetary allegory," he
adds. "While it may have grabbed students' interests, it doesn't really teach
them anything about the gold standard and, in particular, the debate about the
gold standard."

Professor Hansen thinks the author was just trying to create a new kind of
fairytale, the "Harry Potter of its time".
“ There's no solid evidence that Baum had written it as a monetary allegory ”
Bradley Hansen, economics professor
Soon after publication, Baum adapted his book into a stage musical for adults
which opened in 1902. Ranjit Dighe, who wrote The Historian's Wizard of Oz, says
it poked fun at Theodore Roosevelt and the Populists, but Baum was playing for
laughs, like Jay Leno.

Little can be learnt from Baum about the modern economic crisis, says Professor
Taylor, although in both instances people have demanded more government action.
The Bank of England has - as the Populists more than 100 years ago demanded -
provided a boost to the monetary supply, although the term "quantitative easing"
was probably little known in the 1890s. And ultimately the US defeated deflation
by creating money from new discoveries of gold abroad.
L Frank Baum died before the debates over his true intent had started. But in
the book's introduction, he stated that he was only writing to please children.
He was no doubt unaware of its future appeal to economics students.
 

juggo

Member
Itisme.

Are you stating that you are a Robert Tilton type who speaks in tounges.Are you serious? I suppose you praise god with rattlesnakes,given your mentality.I am truely sorry if I have offended,but i require further research.You,sir,are a fanatic.
Good day.

Peace,
juggo
 
T

texsativa

according to buddha, the devil is just a mental construct, not really real.

your statement rudedog, really just beggars more questions, who is god then and who is the devil?

if the devil is just created by god, then why?

cause we as the children of god, need a challenge? (...that would be bit like taking your family pitbull and siccing him on the toddler in the family..)

and being made in the image of god does not say we are god, are we made in the essence of god? then where are our powers? where is our eternal life?

why do we have to die for it? pawns in the war between our parent and what our oldest sibling?

also, statements like this, "like your religion is ultimately right" are somewhat arrogant.

your beliefs are only believed by a handful of people.

where do you come off in saying it is the ultimate religion and holder of the truth?
have you read and studied all the religions? prayed to their gods? meditated on this?

which does remind me of the jews, "the chosen people of god" and look at the trouble it got them in?

Taking that there is God and the devil, then why is there evil in the world and why doesn't God put an end to it, and why was it even allowed in the first place if God is good? Did he create evil? And are we God if we are created in his image? All reasonable thoughts.

We are not God, but all are created by God (Hindu, Muslim, Jew, Christian, Budhist, etc), we are all children of God. God is good. The absence of God is not good. The devil is without God, not good, evil. The devil was originally an angel, a follower of God, but fell from grace. We, as humans, also have a choice to be a follower of God, and be good, or choose to have an absence of God. The world is perfect because we are allowed this choice. The bible says God will put an end to the evil of the world in His time, not ours. Then the followers of God will enjoy Him and the goodness He provides. There is no evil in heaven as those are with God. But there is more to being a good person to get to heaven or making social appearances at church. A relationship with God is the true reward. As I believe, we will all meet our maker at some time, and it may not be too late to have a relationship with God. I believe all who enter Heaven will be followers of Jesus Christ, who said Love one another. If we can love, all else falls into place. I know some Muslims who show me love, so I can't believe they are doomed to eternity. But I also believe they will see Jesus in all his glory and the truth will be know. Truth is truth, and the truth will always be.
 

RudeDog

Well-known member
Veteran
@sso....I hear what you are saying and I don't mean to come across arrogant in any way. I'd like to have the time to keep up with this thread, perhaps my posts are a bit 'too the point, matter of fact'?
I don't have all the answers and I'm open to any ideas, my life experiences have lead me to where I am, hopefully evolving every day....I respect your thinking, it's all about planting the seed.
 

sso

Active member
Veteran
Sso
Saw your same post in the run Paul thread...
How can you say the only war candidate would cause war?
Am I just missing sarcasm?

nah, im just going by what i see when i look at his face.

i might be totally wrong.

Here is a different interpretation , based on the same evidence.

thats actually the same interpretation, just interesting that "the wizard of Oz" is still so fitting to describe society, with just a few words changed.

Taking that there is God and the devil, then why is there evil in the world and why doesn't God put an end to it, and why was it even allowed in the first place if God is good? Did he create evil? And are we God if we are created in his image? All reasonable thoughts.

We are not God, but all are created by God (Hindu, Muslim, Jew, Christian, Budhist, etc), we are all children of God. God is good. The absence of God is not good. The devil is without God, not good, evil. The devil was originally an angel, a follower of God, but fell from grace. We, as humans, also have a choice to be a follower of God, and be good, or choose to have an absence of God. The world is perfect because we are allowed this choice. The bible says God will put an end to the evil of the world in His time, not ours. Then the followers of God will enjoy Him and the goodness He provides. There is no evil in heaven as those are with God. But there is more to being a good person to get to heaven or making social appearances at church. A relationship with God is the true reward. As I believe, we will all meet our maker at some time, and it may not be too late to have a relationship with God. I believe all who enter Heaven will be followers of Jesus Christ, who said Love one another. If we can love, all else falls into place. I know some Muslims who show me love, so I can't believe they are doomed to eternity. But I also believe they will see Jesus in all his glory and the truth will be know. Truth is truth, and the truth will always be.

hmm, yes, i agree with the love part, but the stuff about god and the devil, is really up to interpretation, since those stories you mentioned have many many different versions going around (from many different time periods) and not really saying the same thing.


i think heaven is here now, for those that want it.

create your own heaven with love and understanding.

and actually buddha and many others talked about the same things as jesus, the only difference are the levels of "miracles" (which i suspect were edited in by the romans)

and the children of something would be the same as the parent, ergo, god and his children, gods.

now, im not saying , there isnt a god, im saying and betting that god wants us much rather to be just loving one another, not thinking about some absent parent. (maybe god is just too big to be seen)

@sso....I hear what you are saying and I don't mean to come across arrogant in any way. I'd like to have the time to keep up with this thread, perhaps my posts are a bit 'too the point, matter of fact'?
I don't have all the answers and I'm open to any ideas, my life experiences have lead me to where I am, hopefully evolving every day....I respect your thinking, it's all about planting the seed.

well, i respect your thinking too and i like to the point posts.

its just that, lets say there is god, still the important thing is humans. and finding ways to coexist and love one another.

and calling ourselves this and that in the name of religion, is only serving to divide us.

allready i see some infighting has started and because of that.

see, we are talking of metaphysical things, when we talk of god and spirits.

and the exact nature of gods and spirits is debatable, (even whether they exist or not)

we will all find out the truth about these things when we die, but now

we are here, we are physical, we hurt, we love and god is not around physically.

we should be having a party

not a fooking fight ;)

wasting our time arguing about such things, is just killing all the joy and fun in life.


so this one likes that and that one likes this?

so this one believes that and another find comfort in this?

life is scary, we need one another.

and we need pacifiers (cause we are children in life, we are not grown ups, not completely, at best, we are a young man, starting out in life)

lets not make it any more difficult than it is.

and personally, i find love to be the seed that needs planting, not god.

us that need to be respected and loved,

after all, god can come by any time ;) (and then we´ll love the fuck out of him, if he´s a nice guy ;)

till then, lets love one another and have some fun.

lets make this an interesting conversation.

let us all say what we want to say, what we feel.

its all valid,

its all worthwhile.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top