Nature's Wonder Drug Curbed by Illuminati

[itisme]

juggo,

May i ask what your religion is,what church you go to,and about your hollow beliefs in Christ in general.

I am a pentecostal christian. I grew up witnessing the Holy Ghost take people over in Church. The most real to me was when me and my 13 year old cousin went to church and he spoke in tongues. I was the same age. I asked him about it but I even forget what he said. I had forget Church for many years.

 

[itisme]

Stop posting useless info.I am so sick of 911 theories

This isn't your thread. It is an illuminati thread.

 

[lost in a sea]

itisme chill out posting so much off topic stuff man(its an illuminati-cannabis thread,, maybe all plants),, el dub made a good point as well,,

anyone just in here to poke fun as though they are really intellectually superior need to just piss off really,, its old your boring and all your saying is this's crazy and thats madness,, well thanks for that!

and just because icke happens to talk about them being lizards doesnt make the rest of what he says false in anyway you have to take on each individual arguement not just tarnish a human for one thing they said,, but for some its one strike and your out,,, ironically that is the lizard brain, the brainstem firing fight or flight,, cognitive dissonance,, for some its a narrow existence of what they have in their tunnel vision,,

defocalise

 

[juggo]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

 

[lost in a sea]

funny how even wikipedia attacks cognitive dissonance as though it doesnt exist and is some conspiracy,, i hate that nwo facade,, its increasingly more stupid than good,, its not at the 50/50 point yet or anything but getting closer for me,,

one world knowledge,,

altered by the cia every few seconds,,

 

[juggo]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/CognitiveDissonanceDiagram.jpg

References1.^ a b Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.^ http://www.publicgood.org/wic/Quickly/CognitiveDissonance.html
3.^ http://psychcentral.com/blog/archiv...nitive-dissonance-the-lies-we-tell-ourselves/
4.^ a b Elster, Jon. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge 1983, p. 123ff.
5.^ Festinger, L. (1956). When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of A Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World, by Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter. Harper-Torchbooks, Jan. 1956. ISBN 0061311324
6.^ Aronson, E., Akert, R.D., & Wilson, T.D. (2006). Social psychology (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
7.^ Baron, R.A., & Byrne, D. (2004). Social Psychology (10th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
8.^ a b Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 4, pp. 1–34. New York: Academic Press.
9.^ Prasad,J. (1950). A comparative study of rumors and reports in earthquakes. British Journal of Psychology, 41, 129-144.
10.^ Knox,R. & Inkster,J. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 319-323.
11.^ Mills,J. (1958). Changes in moral attitudes following temptation. Journal of Personality, 26, 517-531.
12.^ Festinger, L., Riecken, H.W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.^ Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J.M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210.
14.^ a b Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J.M. (1963). Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 584–588.
15.^ Brehm, J. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389.
16.^ a b Egan, L.C., Bloom, P., & Santos, L.R. (2010). Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 204-207.
17.^ Aronson, E. & Mills, J. (1956). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177–181.
18.^ Lee, S.W.S., & Schwartz, N. (2010) Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Science, 328(5979), 709.
19.^ Zhong, C.B. & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451-1452.
20.^ Aronson, E. (1995). The Social Animal. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
21.^ Lepper, M. R. & Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 479-486.
22.^ a b Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V., & Gamas, W.S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116-159.
23.^ Graesser, A. C., Baggett, W., & Williams, K. (1996). Question-driven explanatory reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S17-S32.
24.^ Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. London: Sage Publications.
25.^ Cooper, J., & Axsom, D. (1982). Integration of clinical and social psychology. Oxford University Press.
26.^ Mendonca, P. J., & Brehm, S. S. (1983). Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 343-358.
27.^ Cooper, J. (1980). Reducing fears and increasing attentiveness: The role of dissonance reduction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 452–460.
28.^ Axsom, D., & Cooper, J. (1985). Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy: The role of effort justification in inducing weight loss. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 149 –160.
29.^ Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means for encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116-128.
30.^ Fried, C. B., & Aronson, E. (1995). Hypocrisy, misattribution, and dissonance reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 925-933.
31.^ Son Hing, L. S., Li, W., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 71–78.
32.^ Fointiat, V. (2004). "I know what I have to do, but…" When hypocrisy leads to behavioral change. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 741-746.
33.^ Bem, D.J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(3), 199–218.
34.^ Bem, D.J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200.
35.^ Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 703–709.
36.^ Kiesler, C.A., & Pallak, M.S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83(6), 1014–1025.
37.^ Tedeschi, J.T., Schlenker, B.R., & Bonoma, T.V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26(8), 685–695.
38.^ Coppin, G., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Porcherot, C., & Sander, D. (2010). I’m no longer torn after choice: How explicit choices implicitly shape preferences of odors Psychological Science, 21(8), 489–493.
39.^ Cooper, J., & Fazio, R.H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–266). New York: Academic Press.
40.^ Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J.W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., & Nelson, D.E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 5–16.
41.^ Chen, M.K., & Risen J.L. (2010) How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 573-594.
42.^ Holden, S. (In press). Do choices affect preferences? Some doubts and new evidence.
43.^ a b Izuma, K., Matsumoto, M., Murayama, K., Samejima, K., Sadato, N., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 107(51), 22014-22019.
44.^ Sharot, T., Velasquez, C. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1231-1235.
45.^ Risen J.L. & Chen, M.K. (2010) How to study choice-induced attitude change: Strategies for fixing the free-choice paradigm. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1151–1164.
46.^ Van Veen, V., Krug, M.K., Schooler, J.W., & Carter, C.S. (2009). Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance. Nature Neuroscience, 12(11), 1469–1474.
47.^ Sharot, T., De Martino, B., & Dolan, R.J. (2009). How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3760–3765.
48.^ Qin, J., Kimel, S., Kitayama, S., Wang, X., Yang, X., & Han, S. (2011). How choice modifies preference: Neural correlates of choice justification Neuroimage, 55(1), 240–246.
49.^ a b Read, S.J., Vanman, E.J., & Miller L.C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)Introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 26–53.
50.^ Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K.G. (2007). The Meta-Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 657–686.
51.^ Van Overwalle, F., & Jordens, K. (2002). An adaptive connectionist model of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 204–231.
52.^ Monroe, B.M., & Read, S.J. (2008). A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) Model, Psychological Review, 115(3), 733–759.

Are we having fun yet?

peace,
juggo

 

[sso]

well, offtopic, quick.

if there do exist the god and the devil.

then according to the story, the father of creation decided to allow the devil (his oldest son and the most powerful creature in history (and invisible to boot) to prey on his other children.

without most of them being aware of it even.

its like picking sides in the dumbest family struggle since history began (ok oldest kid, here are the newest kids, worship them as you would me (greatest father in the history of the world, requiring worship)

believe in the father and you get protection from your oldest brother, who´s insane with jelousy cause the father decided to give all the inheritance to the youngest kids.

well, if they survived the attacks of the oldest brother and if they dont, All to hell my children!.

if this were Actually true?

id be forced to pick my own side and stand in the middle or apart.

that is one, retarded family. (or creator and creations if you wish to call it that (im a marionette in a cosmic powerstruggle? fuck that)

course

you can put any slant you like on that particular story and interpret it in many ways (According to what version of the stories you read..)


though the most prevalent one seems to be faith in the god and the devil as Scapegoats.

all thanks to god or blame to the devil.

makes us down here, kinda redundant.

 

[juggo]

Sso,
Thank you for just throwing your views out there.Thats awesome.I am inclined to concur with you on a lot of topics.I await your next response,,although, I'm sure you have much more knowledge on said subjects than I. I await new knowledge,and thank you for sharing! Thanks for letting me participate in this forum.

peace,
juggo

 

[sso]

Sso,
Thank you for just throwing your views out there.Thats awesome.I am inclined to concur with you on a lot of topics.I await your next response,,although, I'm sure you have much more knowledge on said subjects than I. I await new knowledge,and thank you for sharing! Thanks for letting me participate in this forum.

peace,
juggo

thank you yourself.

but im afraid you are attributing too much to me especially the last sentence

but, its true, i have read much and thought much about these things, done some exploring and stuff.

but, again, lots of buts i am myself curious about what you dont concur with me about, since i am only a fallible human

and many minds are better than one.

but undoubtedly ill say something on the subject later, i dont seem to be able to help myself lol

though if you wanted to, you could ask me some questions, i cant promise an answer though

see you around dude, have a good one!

 

[sso]

.. i will always answer anyone that talks to me.

i consider us (life) a family, though a heavily disfunctional one lol

 

[juggo]

Repect.

 

[AfroSheep]

My source field investigations book just arrived today,
A book by david wilcock,
Should be an extremely amazing read, time to put my head down and thumbs up
.
Peace.

 

[bombadil.360]

course

you can put any slant you like on that particular story and interpret it in many ways (According to what version of the stories you read..)

you're right; you can put any slant to the story that you want, in order to make your conclusions more in line with the story, like you just did

 

[mrcreosote]

Look up sarcasm , its a UK thing.

I got it. I loved it.
We can add it to the encyclopedia of batshit.
I'd like to thank all posters on this thread but one in particular stands out.

My compilation task is almost 85% complete.

My guess is that the Illuminati are going to be disappointed that the field is so crowded but competition is good in the discipline...

The best will rise to the top.

 

[budlover123]

This is a public forum, if you want to tell someone they are going to hell, send them a PM.

Back to the whole Illuminati thing, I believe in the forces behind governments around the world, they are called rich people. Do you ever get the feeling that these people don't have control like they used to anymore?

Like too many rich people with too many conflicting ideas, somehow they managed to let control slip away from them a bit. I still believe that Obama answers to these rich people, but I believe we have some strange opportunities to get some shit done if we keep taking action like Occupy, no matter who the president happens to be.

 

[mrcreosote]

lost in a sea says
"and just because icke happens to talk about them being lizards doesnt make the rest of what he says false in anyway you have to take on each individual arguement not just tarnish a human for one thing they said"

I agree wholeheartedly.
In no way should a witnesses veracity in prior testimony impede the weighing of fact in subsequent testimony.
However, I submit to you the proposition that if the subject in question advances a singular preposterous imagining as fact, that the probability increases exponentially that subsequent issue will be of dubious merit.
In this he succeeds.

Mr. Ickes ideas have convinced me of only one thing...

A prominent position in the Encyclopedia of Batshit.

While I have decided to use a chronological layout for the Encyclopedia, I admit the temptation to list him after the Beatles
'Paul Is Dead' section is strong.
Ickes has a rock and roll feel to it.

 

[bombadil.360]

you could sell the encyclopedia as organic nutes as well, guano!

 

[sso]

bombadil , heheh yeah, but like i said, best not to take these things too seriously, who knows who is right and who is not?

im certainly not going to lose any sleep over it and i hope you wont either (doubt it actually )



funnily, to what ogmolton said, ive been in hell, wasnt god that brought me back, but the love of a good woman (well, she and the cats and family)


about the illuminati and them being lizards.

dunno. while i find them certainly to be monstrous, one does not have to be some space lizard to accomplish that.


then again, stories of the naga´s and alike, have been going around for a long time..

does it make it true?

well. even if it were true.

talking to some norms.

the elite are bad people! norm "yup"

we should do something about it! norm "yup"

and they are really walking talking shapeshifting lizards! norm "eh...you mean metaphorically?" (And looks at you funny and sidles away lol)

plenty of evidence about them being human shit, about them being space aliens,

nope.

well, except from what would be publically considered very sketchy sources.

would be kinda funny for Icke and others the day we bring down the elite

and them really being space aliens.

lol

"i fucking told you so!"

is gonna be pretty loud that day

well

that and the "hzzzsss!"

 

[foomar]

Saw a presentation by David around 1980 in a small midlands town , he was an excellent orator but a showman at heart , took others ideas and made a good pre internet living from it.
He is not talking in allegory , they are supposed to really be aliens in disguise.

He is not a mentalist , but a successful businessman pretending to be one , thankfully he has little to say on canna.

 

[mrcreosote]

would be kinda funny for Icke and others the day we bring down the elite

and them really being space aliens.

lol

"i fucking told you so!"

is gonna be pretty loud that day
------------------------------------------

Based on the evidence presented, I'm pretty confident that, at this point in time, my chances of suffering abject humiliation are low.