C
ChynaRyder
Stop your headaches COLD instead of willfully propagating them.
I hear what you are saying, but I view this as an opportunity to answer some questions...and that alone. I realize the potential problems that can occur, and these genes will never be any more than entertainment for my inquisitive mind...The MJ botany book would not be spreading wrong or damaging info, and I think there may be something to this. None of the Females are showing any herm traits, and I have been deliberately stressing them with drought, irregular photoperiod, and cold nighttime temps in order to get them to throw a banana...and they wont, or at least not yet. If indeed this 'herm' trait is limited only to the males, and the progeny of their mating take on a decided lean towards being female, then this is something worth exploring to me.
Mossy - It sounds to me like DC was already heterozygous for flowering photeperiod...it has to be, unless we throw out all that was assumed to be known about the autoflowering trait....What I struggle with is why a Tom Hill genetic would be this way...Unless your DC lines picked up the af gene somewhere in the HTC process...I will be doing some crosses here soon with congo, c-99, and blueberry to af...will let you know in July/August the af% in the F1, but my early money is on 0.