Milo Yiannopoulos....What an interesting person.

[billy_big_bud!]

im all for religious freedom so long as it remains peaceful. you can praise witches, fairies or allah and as long as no harm is coming to anyone i dont see a problem. however. if your religion requires you to cut off pieces of flesh from female members of your family for their own good i take issue with that most certainly. one of the biggest problems with religion (and politics for that matter) is that it is an extremely dated concept that may have been valuable in the past, does little to unite us as people. i truly feel sorry for anyone born into religion. which is most religious people. to have a concept thrust upon you at a young age seems unfair to me.

 

[CaptainDankness]

Correct-a-mundo Capitano, in fact I am not against muslims as people/humans, what I am against is ISLAM, the murderous medieval ideology that the muslim people have been indoctrinated into by force (if necessary) from birth, for the vast majority of them....and there is much good in most religions but in the case of Islam the bad far-far outweighs any good there might be there.

What is your take on HONOR KILLINGS, treating women like CHATTEL:
[chat-l]
noun
1.
Law.. Often, chattels. a movable article of personal property.
2.
Often, chattels. any article of tangible property other than land, buildings, and other things annexed to land.
3.
a slave.

Do you think that you can justify pedophilia?
How about lying and dishonesty?....Then,

TAQIYYA is good for you.

Does Islam permit Muslims to lie?

Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."

There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

How about various forms of capital punishment?
Maybe your are partial to stoning people to death?, or chopping limbs off of people for minor crimes?

Do you think that its good sport to take homosexuals on base jumping lessons from tall buildings....without the use of a parachute?

Maybe you are partial to a spot of decapitation theater, where you can take your kids to watch on a family outing, knowing that this is what Mohammed did to over 800 souls....back in the day.

Oh...not to forget SLAVERY, yeah....do you fancy bringing slavery back again to the west?

If you groove to any or all of the above, then you should immediately get your ass down to the local mosque and start reading the Koran and all of its Hadith's, so that you can convert to ISLAM.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx

Yeah, lots of the Muslim religion is terrible. They treat women worse than dogs cut their clitoris off make them wear sheets and treat them like property. To this day they marry children and have many wives.

The slave trade has picked up a lot especially since the horrible torture and murder of Gaddafi of course all backed by the US and NATO all in favor of Saudi Arabia. The worst thing about Hillary Clinton " we came we saw he died hahaha" they sodomized the man with a fucking sword. Now Libya is the center of the slave trade and people hate Trump. Of course our main stream media is filling us with propaganda.

The Jews were pretty bad too half of this is in the Old Testament of the Bible. How the Romans ever accepted Christianity to begin with is just fucked but it was do to lies of the Jews with their tales of Jesus. Jesus was a decent story he was said to be peaceful, forgiving and accepting. But the Roman Catholic Church pushed the Old Testament as the words of the true God up until the age of reason in the late 1500's the Muslims do not accept Jesus but the teachings of the maniac Muhammad which is why they are still that way today.

They claim the Iranian way of Islam is not as bad as the Saudis while they still worship Muhammad and his teachings, hate the West and Christianity.

I don't understand why our governments would be so tolerant of this tyrannical ideology. But at the same time they are not for freedom at all, for a free country we have the highest prison population in the world. Horrible laws against the use of drugs which to do heroin is your freedom of choice but most Americans are for prohibition of heroin even though it doesn't effect them if someone does heroin until they die. I've been addicted and I kicked it I sold heroin and to this day I see nothing wrong with it. People wanted it so did I so I helped them obtain it nothing wrong with it, really no worse than alcohol. The only bad parts of it are the fact it's illegal people got bad alcohol because of prohibition same is happening with heroin.

Seems they want Islam in our countries so we will never get our freedoms back. Taxation is armed robbery you don't pay they take your land by armed force and put you in prison the biggest reason for the American revolution but now they have played us right back into the tyrannical ways so many people died to end. Makes me sick the way so many people are for Socialism and Communism and totally against the free market the USA was founded upon.

I personally like the idea of "make America great again" I wish we have an all out revolution throughout the entire Western nation's even the world hopefully Russians and all rise up against their governments make our own New World Order in the name of freedom. Thanks to the ANTIFA punks that day might just come sooner than later just needs to start before we end up in WW3.

Seems most of the West is down for a revolution from the Beatles to Bob Marley, Pantera and many others it has to start sometime.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

Ahh pull the "hate" card. Its the snowflakes new version of the black card. Funny.

It wasn't my intention to seem funny.

I was pointing out that your disdain for some people is apparent.

I'm guessing you don't really relate to anyone who isn't exactly like you are.

So, in short, I can't see this going much farther.

Try to enjoy life as much as possible.

 

[CaptainDankness]

Hey stewart....this word 'snowflake', what exactly does it mean to you?

We had a few snowflakes here in South London today, but it wasn't cold enough for them to settle and make snow, but I think that you are using it in some other context.

SJW's Social justice warriors AKA PC snowflakes politically correct. Not sure if y'all have them communist ANTIFA like groups in London mostly just a bunch of far left pussies though now they are protesting anyone somewhat to the right like Milo recently they have been showing up armed waving communist flags and burning American flags.

 

[CaptainDankness]

These punks right here also known as the alt left.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kvfJicVQh_E

 

[geneva_sativa]

hmmmn, i just had a thought, do Muslims even get high???

It seems to me they must or at least just be curious and susceptible to the experience.

Maybe there's some room for improvement here, maybe it's time for some positive outreach to this culture.

Maybe this culture can be slowly 'turned' or subtley converted.

..... after all, it all started with a seed.

This situation could be 'win/win', does ICMag even have any Muslim posters/growers???

Surely they must be here somewhere and if not, it's a population just waiting to be exploited, er what I meant to say was 'served'.

Hey Cosmic,

There are plenty of Sufi and other Muslims that like to toke.

Sufis are an interesting bunch. . . very much into the ecstatic experience of the divine. . . too bad they are often persecuted and attacked by other more violent groups in their countries.

 

[Water-]

Social justice warriors who fight for things like marihuana legalization and other human rights are despised by certain people.

 

[geneva_sativa]

im all for religious freedom so long as it remains peaceful. you can praise witches, fairies or allah and as long as no harm is coming to anyone i dont see a problem. however. if your religion requires you to cut off pieces of flesh from female members of your family for their own good i take issue with that most certainly. one of the biggest problems with religion (and politics for that matter) is that it is an extremely dated concept that may have been valuable in the past, does little to unite us as people. i truly feel sorry for anyone born into religion. which is most religious people. to have a concept thrust upon you at a young age seems unfair to me.

Removal or mutilation of the female clitoris is a pretty cruel and twisted practice, IMO.

Alice Walker wrote a novel about it, forgot the title

 

[CosmicGiggle]

LOL@Captain D, he says he wants a revolution, the west rising up against Islam, well he might just get that revolution but It'll be the west rising up and devouring its own first, NOT Islam!

Enjoy!

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

SJW's Social justice warriors AKA PC snowflakes politically correct. Not sure if y'all have them communist ANTIFA like groups in London mostly just a bunch of far left pussies though now they are protesting anyone somewhat to the right like Milo recently they have been showing up armed waving communist flags and burning American flags.

Oh right, gotcha Captain, so a 'SNOWFLAKE' in American political jargon is a social justice warrior that is supposedly politically correct?

How are you supposed to be politically correct when you don't like any of the current, or past political parties?

So I guess that I must be politically un-correct because I am not a democrat, a republican, a conservative, a labourite, a liberal, a luddite, a white/black/yellow/blue or green supremacist, a flat earther or a birther, a fachist, a communist, a whig, an annimist (oh, is that a religion?, well kinda), or 'The People's Popular Front of Palastine?' and only a humble cannabis enthusiast?

Do I have to be a follower of some sort of political dogma to be 'CORRECT?'....Is it imperative to identify with some sort of established politics for people to take you seriously in this world?

And why do religions get all mixed up with politics? For instance 'Christian Democrats', or 'Muslim Extremists?'....or 'Hindu Communists?'....dear - o - deary me, how bloody confusing is all of this.

POLITICS - SCHMOLITICS!, WHAT A LOAD OF CODS-WALLOP!,

 

[Guest]

quoted wrong post. I know better than wasting time with white guilt leftist snowflakes.
You should check the mirror.

 

[jidoka]

Gypsy...not doubting you but do you have citations for sharia courts in England? We are led to believe they don’t actually exist in the USA.

 

[cooterbrown420]

Please enlighten me about these "injustices black Americans face" in this point in time of the country cooterbrown.this isn't the 60s.I won't stop watching football,but what other country has more black millionaire's than America?this is just false victim mentality being used to stir the pot

Your right there are no injustices being faced by Blacks in America its all an illusion. I mean White males are being killed all the time while pulled over for minor traffic violations. They also get shot while carrying concealed carry permits. How brainwashed could I be to think there are injustices in America. Please forgive me for having common sense and the ability to empathise with other people. BTW speaking of Black millionaire's when has the last time a White millionaire has had racial slurs spray painted on their house like Lebron James? Keep lying to yourself buddy

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

Gypsy...not doubting you but do you have citations for sharia courts in England? We are led to believe they don’t actually exist in the USA.

I found this piece in The Guardian jidoka from back in March 2017, apparently instead of calling them 'courts' they call them 'councils' just to stop some of the criticism methinks, it's quite a long read, so get ya spectacles on....lol

On a freezing, rainswept Sunday in a conference room in Birmingham Central mosque, a young woman in a black padded jacket is crying quietly. Her name is Zaynab and as she lifts up her glasses to rub at her eyes, one of the three religious scholars sitting opposite her starts to speak.

“The panel is in agreement, this marriage is to be dissolved today, Zaynab,” says Dr Amra Bone, one of the only female sharia council judges in the country. “It doesn’t have the ingredients of an Islamic marriage; there is no love, trust, compassion or respect. You have an iddah [waiting] period of three menstrual cycles and you are then free to marry again.”

As Zaynab collects her paperwork, Bone’s colleague, Shaykh Talha Bukhari, an elderly man with a white beard, turns to me. “Marriage is not for shedding tears,” he says quietly, “but here they are rolling down.”

I am at the mosque’s sharia council, which in the past year has dealt with 400 requests for divorce. Sharia councils – often mislabelled as sharia courts – have a sinister reputation in the UK. Like halal meat and the niqab, they are a dog whistle for those seeking to imply that there is a creeping Islamification of the UK. In part, this is because sharia – Islamic – law is synonymous in many people’s minds with terrifying punishments such as stoning. The reality of the councils is much less bloodthirsty but there are still reasons to worry.

Almost all the sharia councils, which first appeared in the UK in the 1980s, were founded to facilitate Islamic divorces for Muslim women who need a religious scholar to end their marriage where their husbands don’t consent (they may also offer religious advice on inheritance, wills or issue religious rulings). They are not the only religious councils – there are also the Jewish Orthodox Beth Din, and Catholic tribunals. The sharia councils are often accused of operating a “parallel legal system” in the UK, but their rulings have no legal standing here or abroad, and they have no enforcement powers. As unofficial bodies, they also have no jurisdiction over custody or financial issues. What they rely on is the weight that religious rulings carry in the Muslim community.

Surprisingly little is known about the councils – even down to how many there are in the UK (estimates range from 30 to 80). Some, like Birmingham’s, are large and long established; others are informal, backroom affairs. Individual imams also carry out the same functions, complicating their definition. Samia Bano, a senior lecturer in law at Soas University of London who has written a book on sharia councils, jokes that they are so informal “I could open one tomorrow”. Since cuts to legal aid made civil divorces more expensive, more couples than ever are turning to them. Yet their critics say they pose a serious threat to Muslim women in the UK.

Prompted by fears that they were discriminatory, Theresa May launched a government inquiry in May last year. Just a month later, the Home Affairs Committee announced its own. In December, the Casey Review by Dame Louise Casey into integration included claims that sharia councils “supported the values of extremists, condoned wife-beating, ignored marital rape and allowed forced marriages”. And in January, a bill aimed at sharia councils put forward by the independent peer Baroness Cox (to bring equality legislation to bear on arbitration and mediation services) had its second reading in the House of Lords, six years after she first began lobbying for one.

Women’s groups, meanwhile, have been raising the alarm for some years. Southall Black Sisters, which addresses the needs of BAME women, calls the councils patriarchal and regressive and wants them shut down. Women are being pressured to return to abusive husbands, it says, and they interfere with child custody and financial matters. Muslim women’s groups accuse Sharia councils of ignoring women’s rights under Islamic, as well as civil, law and cite hair-raising cases of women being told to endure marital rape and polygamy. The Muslim Women’s Network points to an instance where a woman was being repeatedly raped by her husband, who had also married again, but was told to be “patient” by a mediator from a sharia council. They say the councils should be reformed, until an alternative way of seeking a religious divorce can be found.

Unsurprisingly, given their negative press, sharia councils are wary of media interest. Birmingham is confident enough about its reputation to be an exception.

Saba Butt is the council’s administrator. In the months before today’s panel meeting, she has collected testimony and paperwork from the spouses involved in each case, starting with the wives. The women are asked if they want to go through a reconciliation process, or straight to the panel for a decision (the councils offer couples mediation). Islamic marriages are contracts (nikahs), signed by both parties and two witnesses. Each must contain an amount of money (mahr) that is granted to the wife. While both men and women can obtain a divorce in Islam, the process is simpler for men (unless the woman has included an equal right to divorce in the contract, and few do).

Subject to various conditions and restrictions, husbands can end the marriage simply by declaring they are divorcing their wife – known as a talaq. A wife can also initiate a divorce (known as a khula), and if the husband agrees, the marriage can be ended. If he contests it, a third party can dissolve the contract – which is where sharia councils step in. Without the council rulings, the panel tell me, many women feel they are still married in the sight of God – even if they have had a civil divorce.

During the afternoon, I watch women file in, one by one, as seven cases are heard. Some are alone, others have relatives with them; some are mothers. There is a teaching assistant and an eye specialist among them, and most hearings are in English (two women prefer to speak in Urdu). All but one have their marriages dissolved.

Zaynab is a young mother. She explains that her marriage fell apart in 2014, and the last time she saw her husband was when he tried to drunkenly break into her home. He has since moved away.

The three scholars question her gently. Is her marriage registered under English law? No, her husband was worried it would affect his benefits. Did he support her and their children financially? Never. Did he have problems with addiction and gambling? Yes. They shake their heads.

Bone says that the panel all work as volunteers and feel it is their Islamic duty to help the community resolve conflicts. Bukhari recites a story of how the prophet Muhammad ended a woman’s marriage because “she did not like being with her husband”.

“A marriage is not for suffering or for sacrifice,” he says.

Yet because each council operates alone, with rulings based on its panel’s personal knowledge and interpretation of religious laws, their approach and decisions can vary wildly. Bano says some of the 25 women she interviewed for her book found sharia councils patriarchal and problematic. Often women got round this by “forum shopping” for a council that suited them. Yet when things go wrong, there is no accountability.

Amara, a 45-year-old lawyer from London, went to see a sharia council in her 20s. During her three-year marriage, she says her husband hit her, tried to push her down the stairs when she was pregnant, and kept her prisoner for three days. She took out an injunction against him, began civil divorce proceedings, and finally approached a sharia council.

Her voice shakes as she remembers how the three panel judges – all elderly men – reacted. “They asked things like: ‘What did you do to provoke him?’” Her husband had been restricted by the court to supervised contact with their children because of his violence, yet the judges insisted on talking about access. “All they cared about was his relationship with the children – not their safety, or my safety.”

Amara dropped the case, but later approached the Muslim College in Ealing. This, she says, “was a completely different experience”. Her case was dealt with in writing, professionally, and resolved within a few months.

One pressing problem is the increasing number of Muslim couples who are at the mercy of sharia councils because they have had religious ceremonies to mark their marriage but are not legally married under UK law. There is no central registry of Islamic marriages (marriages do not have to take place in a mosque, and you do not need an imam), so it is impossible to know how many couples have had only religious services – Aina Khan, a lawyer and campaigner, has estimated that there could be 100,000 couples in Britain (under the current Marriage Act, only Anglicans, Quakers and Jews are obliged to register their marriage).

“In the past five years there has been a steep increase [in couples having only religious marriages]. It used to be about half [of my clients], now it has crept up to 80%,” says Khan. Some couples intend to have a civil service at a later date, others do not realise an Islamic marriage undertaken in the UK is not legally recognised; some feel it is only a religious marriage that is important to them.

Khan says she has also seen an increase in men wanting to avoid losing money or property in a divorce. “Instead of a prenuptial agreement, men are refusing a legal marriage. Women are worried about losing their rishta [marriage proposal] so they say: ‘OK’.” Yet this means these Muslim women do not have legal protection, even if they have given up work to look after children. Women risk being turned out of their homes with nothing if their marriages break down – the Casey Review explains that this can be particularly worrying with the “lower levels of female employment, lower levels of English language and, anecdotally at least, a lack of awareness of other civil rights” in Muslim communities.

“Religion inherently discriminates against women” … Pragna Patel, chair of Southall Black Sisters. Photograph: Southall Black Sisters
Muslim women who have civil marriages will need a civil divorce too. But those with no civil marriage have to turn to sharia councils and risk being left in limbo for years. Khan says one of her clients had started a new relationship and was pregnant with a child with still no sign of her Islamic divorce from the sharia council she applied to.

Khan fears councils are becoming increasingly misogynistic and inefficient. “Sadly they have become a victim of their own success – they are overworked. The Salafi [ultra-conservative] influence on religion has brought in a real misogyny. They have become more hardline and anti-female.”

This can be seen in the most frightening complaint against sharia councils – that with divorce permissible but discouraged by Islam, women are pressured into mediation with violent partners – or even reconciliation. Savin Bapir-Tarvey, a psychologist with the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation (IKWRO), sees around 15 clients a week, many of whom are extremely vulnerable. She says cultural concepts such as honour are used to manipulate women. “They have experienced severe abuse and their children have witnessed it,” she says, but they are told that “to leave would bring shame on the family”.

Even marital rape can be ignored. “Women who have been through FGM might not make that clear [to their new husbands], but they might say they don’t want to have sex. One woman was told it was her duty – and she should pray while her husband has sex with her – basically while he raped her.”

Bone is clear on the subject of domestic violence: “The Islamic fundamental of marriage is that a woman should feel safe.” If there was violence, “we would go straight ahead and dissolve it”. She also disputes another criticism – that a woman’s testimony at a sharia council is given half the weight of a man’s, insisting that this is not true in her council and is a misinterpretation of sharia law in general.

Over at the well known Islamic Cultural Centre and London Central mosque in Regent’s Park, director Ahmad al-Dubayan is trying to reform councils from within. It has set up a board of sharia councils – 18 so far – with a code of conduct. Dubayan tells me he would like to see less expensive, fairer charges for Islamic divorces (some women pay £400, men considerably less) and an end to delays. He says many Muslims do not understand their marriage rights under Islamic law and that they are putting together a manual to rectify this. There are certainly good experiences amid the horror stories. Khatija from the East Midlands tells me that when she was pregnant with her second child in 2003, she began civil divorce proceedings for coercive control, but her husband defended it. “At that point, coercive control was not a separate offence [in English law]. The judge was appalling. He told me I didn’t seem to have enough reason for a divorce.” Khatija was told to wait until the pair had been separated for five years – which took until 2009.

It was the sharia council in Dewsbury, she says, who took the abuse seriously, arranging an Islamic divorce in a matter of months. “The imam I dealt with was very, very kind. I explained how I wasn’t allowed out of the house, even when I was with my parents in the UK [her husband lived abroad] – he would still control me. Before I went out, I would have to ring to check with him.”

Southall Black Sisters, however, is firm in its opposition. Religion and family law are too dangerous a mix to allow sharia councils to continue to operate. “Religion inherently discriminates against women,” stresses director Pragna Patel. “You cannot access justice if the people who are violating your rights are dispensing it.”

Along with other secular women’s groups, it has boycotted the government inquiry, pointing out that it is headed by a theologian rather than a judge, and has Islamic scholars in place of human rights experts. Sharia council supporters point out that women choose to have Islamic divorces of their own free will yet Patel says this ignores the fact that they do so to avoid being “treated as outcasts” by conservative communities, who view divorce as shameful.

Bano agrees that state law, however imperfect, “is the only system that Muslim and vulnerable women have for protection” and “in family law matters or in issues of vulnerability and marginalisation we should never have a delegation into the community”.

IKWRO is considering another way to take on sharia councils. They are looking for a test case to prove that “marital captivity” – refusing to give a woman a religious divorce – is a form of forced marriage. If men were fearful of being prosecuted under this legislation, the group says, there would be no need for sharia councils.

Yet Muslim women’s groups argue that women who feel they need a religious divorce should not be left without an avenue to obtain one, while Khan says changing the Marriage Act to ensure all marriages are registered would help protect women. A clause in the Islamic marriage contract could then make civil divorces valid Islamically.

Alongside this, she suggests ensuring there are more female sharia judges, and making councils more accountable with a central governing body to ensure all decisions comply with British law. “As a community we should be a beacon on how to have a happy family life, and how to end a marriage in dignity if it goes wrong,” she says.

For the women at Birmingham sharia council, at least, the day has brought some relief. It’s dark outside when the last applicant is told her marriage is dissolved, and she will soon be free to marry again. “That’s the last thing on my mind,” she says quickly.

https://www.theguardian.com/law/201...-and-anti-women-or-a-dignified-way-to-divorce

 

[jidoka]

Just so I got it straight the “marriage” takes place outside of British law...no legal contract at all? So not even British civil court would recognize it to begin with.

Couldn’t that be solved with education?

 

[pinkus]

Those middle east muslims countries have some of the lowest IQ averages in the world. Combine that with no education, add a big helping of indoctrination and you have a proxy army at your disposal. Its who's behind them directing them thats of greatest interest to most people. Some advisories use pawns to attack their enemies Gypsy. Smell the coffee.

This from the flat earthier that is afraid to be indoctrinated into believing in gravity or evolution. LMFAO

 

[Water-]

Who cares? I'll down vote it. Troublemaker. Do you even know WTF is going on in Europe? If they don't clean house...every city will have mosques blaring the call to prayer over loudspeakers in 50 years. Wake up ! England is bending over backwards for Islam. Acid attacks are normal. The Mayor of London said living in a major city, you should expect terror attacks. This Muslim mayor has his religion in mind...not the history nor traditions of the English people in mind. There is no free speech in England....post something negative against a 'Protected' class and expect a visit...Of course those of superior intellect , such as Mr. Water here...can spew all the hatred they want at Christians. Hummm, maybe it's because Christians won't put a fatwa on your ass?

Do I know what is going on in Europe?

I am British citizen and my family has sacrificed greatly for sake of the nation.
My grandfather, great grandfather and great uncle where Grenadier Guards who died protecting England.
My grandmother was awarded the OBE ( Officer of the Order of the British Empire) by the Queen for all the work she did for the poor.

The Wall and Final Cut albums story is basically my mothers story in many ways, and I have had to deal with that.

I have a fairly good understanding of how Britain got into the position she is in and what is going down since my entire family lives there and always has. I chose to move to a warmer place.
My entire family supports Brexit and so do I .

Have you ever been to England?


And I have never mentioned Islam or Britain in this thread.

You bore me.
Go find someone else's time to waste

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

Just so I got it straight the “marriage” takes place outside of British law...no legal contract at all? So not even British civil court would recognize it to begin with.

Couldn’t that be solved with education?

Many muslim men have more than one wife and polygamy is illegal in the UK, so they cannot legally get married to more than one woman. They get around this obstacle by marrying multiple wives using these islamic sharia councils, so they are not legal by British law and cannot be prosecuted for polygamy.

Plus, to keep their wives poor, dependent on them, and unlikely to leave them muslim men do not prefer a legally binding marriage in the UK, where a woman is entitled to at least 50% of a mans wealth after a divorce in a British court. Again a 'wife' is less likely to leave her husband if she would be flat broke and homeless after the separation. Its all about the man having full control over the woman/women.

A muslim man can easily end a marriage that is not legally bound thru British law simply by saying to his wife/wives 'I DIVORCE YOU', and then he can easily kick her out of the family home.....where-as a woman has to appeal to divorce thru one of these Islamic councils/courts to be able to have the union dissolved.

Obviously the power over the marriage is stacked high in the mans favour within Islamic law, where a woman is treated like chattel (a slave or possession).

Most all fundamentalist muslim men do not allow their wives to be educated, they make them stay at home and they are not allowed to go out unless their husband says that they can, and then only with their husband or a close male relative.

 

[CaptainDankness]

Oh right, gotcha Captain, so a 'SNOWFLAKE' in American political jargon is a social justice warrior that is supposedly politically correct?

How are you supposed to be politically correct when you don't like any of the current, or past political parties?

So I guess that I must be politically un-correct because I am not a democrat, a republican, a conservative, a labourite, a liberal, a luddite, a white/black/yellow/blue or green supremacist, a flat earther or a birther, a fachist, a communist, a whig, an annimist (oh, is that a religion?, well kinda), or 'The People's Popular Front of Palastine?' and only a humble cannabis enthusiast?

Do I have to be a follower of some sort of political dogma to be 'CORRECT?'....Is it imperative to identify with some sort of established politics for people to take you seriously in this world?

And why do religions get all mixed up with politics? For instance 'Christian Democrats', or 'Muslim Extremists?'....or 'Hindu Communists?'....dear - o - deary me, how bloody confusing is all of this.

POLITICS - SCHMOLITICS!, WHAT A LOAD OF CODS-WALLOP!,

From what I can make of it you have to be Democrat, liberal, socialist or Communist. To fit in with the PC snowflakes. Lol

If you are Republican, Libertarian, Christian or anywhere in between your called a fascist especially if you happen to be a white male. Lol

Won't be long until shit goes down with them ANTIFA idiots attacking people for freedom of speech especially since they are now bearing arms. They don't know what they are getting themselves into you got the 3% militia men, Hells Angles, Outlaws, Banditos, veterans, police and just regular old country folk armed to the teeth just waiting for shit to get ugly.

Of course they have a lot of Muslims some Hispanic and blacklivesmatter on their side but they don't stand a chance once lead starts flying it's going to get real ugly real quick.

 

[CaptainDankness]

LOL@Captain D, he says he wants a revolution, the west rising up against Islam, well he might just get that revolution but It'll be the west rising up and devouring its own first, NOT Islam!

Enjoy!

Islam has no power to fight an all out war with the West they lack a Navy, Air Force and a well equipped Army. plus the Middle East has to deal with Israel first and they ain't no joke their is a reason we are allies.