Non-profits still have to make money for payroll, rent, utilities, lawyers, security, future expansion, bribes, etc.
this right here shows your lack of understanding the situation. non-profit organizations don't need bribes to operate. if they are bribing LEO in MI, it's because they are doing something in their operation that is illegal, i.e. smuggling large quantities of marijuana across state lines. which is the whole problem in the first place.
the point of me bringing up the non-profit organization point was to argue the pharma comparison. pharma companies are obvious multi billion dollar corporations that we know have been fucking the public for years. tell me why my grandmother's antibiotic to get rid of a chronic bladder infection cost her $17 a pill WITH medicare, but xanax and vicodin is under $1 a pill? cause one people get addicted to and then can't live their life without, the other one actually fixes something. it's all about money.
yes non-profit organizations need money for payroll and other overhead, but look up the ratings of non-profits in the country and look at the % of money the highest rated pay out to their cause. the highest rated put out around 95% of what they take in. the lowest rated, and the most well known "non-profit" in the country is the Susan G. Komen for the cure foundation, which is a scam from the start. they only pay out 43% of what they take in every year and their top 10 employees make $200k+ a year...all while charging women with breast cancer $2300 to walk in an event every year. you don't raise the $2300 from sponsors for your walk? don't worry it doesn't affect Susan G. Koman, cause they make you have a credit card on file and charge YOU the money you're short. look it up, it's documented, a non-profit cancer foundation taking cancer patients to collections for money they couldn't raise to donate to them in the first place.
not in MI? not a legal patient or caregiver? get the fuck out of this thread now because you're a clown and don't know what you're talking about.