Hey sam, !
Great infos mate, i like especially the part where you talk about terpens with pure thc... man i ld love to see some reports on that, associating terpens with high "specifications"...
at a time i was thinking of doing some kind of smoke report database, using IC model, and with enough reports filled, we could try to link tastes/smell and high using statistics. would that be worth it ? -but i ld have to learn php and mysql for that, and didn t had the time nor motivation to do that, yet.
hey doc !
well I meant real males sorry for not being clear !
i m in my right mind (at least i think ^^), and i tried to vaporise males for "scientific" purposes ^^ and it does get me high, but the males i used where too young so not enough resin (couldn t afford to keep them flowering)...
if you look closely on a fully mature male, as you know, they are a lot of trichomes... since trichomes are the only thing vaporised, there should be no difference between a male and a female.. even try vaporising leaves with few resin content, if you get enough of them, you ll get as high as with the buds, and same taste.
(also sam i was refering to my trip to nepal, but was thinking more for vaporising fresh females there, as you said they probably use open pollination anyway...)
I understand sam that vaporizing is very subjective, especially since they are a lot of cannabinoids and terpens involved in the high... and that there is not the best way to try to determine different cannabinoids than GC.
Would it be possible to try for example vaporizing all the thc of a sample at 160°, than keep the sample and try it without any previous consumption, so that you can identify cbd content, or at least compare to other samples ? ( there will still be the terpens involved, but less) it could help stopping that only THC plants spreading by nowadays breeding ?
(i know it s a bit out of the subject)
i ld love to see, as i told you at the beginning of the post, some reports about terpens and the high! and i m sure a lot of us would love too... how much would you say terpens are involved in high ?
your answers and the time you took to reply ! I hope i m not being silly asking them.... and not hijacking your thread... feel free to delete my post if so...
+++
Great infos mate, i like especially the part where you talk about terpens with pure thc... man i ld love to see some reports on that, associating terpens with high "specifications"...
at a time i was thinking of doing some kind of smoke report database, using IC model, and with enough reports filled, we could try to link tastes/smell and high using statistics. would that be worth it ? -but i ld have to learn php and mysql for that, and didn t had the time nor motivation to do that, yet.
docleaf said:We meant,, have you ever used a vapouriser to judge the males you've reversed into female ,, not normal standard male plants. No-one in their right mind smokes males these days... lol
hey doc !
well I meant real males sorry for not being clear !
i m in my right mind (at least i think ^^), and i tried to vaporise males for "scientific" purposes ^^ and it does get me high, but the males i used where too young so not enough resin (couldn t afford to keep them flowering)...
if you look closely on a fully mature male, as you know, they are a lot of trichomes... since trichomes are the only thing vaporised, there should be no difference between a male and a female.. even try vaporising leaves with few resin content, if you get enough of them, you ll get as high as with the buds, and same taste.
(also sam i was refering to my trip to nepal, but was thinking more for vaporising fresh females there, as you said they probably use open pollination anyway...)
I understand sam that vaporizing is very subjective, especially since they are a lot of cannabinoids and terpens involved in the high... and that there is not the best way to try to determine different cannabinoids than GC.
I agree, but i ld love to be sure after all, this is just a new tool which maybe hasn t be explored enough ! and there is no best way than posting on ic about it ^^maybe it is beyond a simple Vaporizer to do what you need.
Would it be possible to try for example vaporizing all the thc of a sample at 160°, than keep the sample and try it without any previous consumption, so that you can identify cbd content, or at least compare to other samples ? ( there will still be the terpens involved, but less) it could help stopping that only THC plants spreading by nowadays breeding ?
(i know it s a bit out of the subject)
i ld love to see, as i told you at the beginning of the post, some reports about terpens and the high! and i m sure a lot of us would love too... how much would you say terpens are involved in high ?
your answers and the time you took to reply ! I hope i m not being silly asking them.... and not hijacking your thread... feel free to delete my post if so...
+++