LMAO 
-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Joe Biden Thread
- Thread starter aridbud
- Start date
Yup, right, sure thing.
Unfortunately your orange god will be in court next year. He's gonna have a hard time being speaker of the house from a Georgia Courtroom. His grip on the party is slipping. A year ago 80% of the party put trump first. That's now down to 60% and still falling. Since the Republican Party isn't making any new Republicans you have to keep the sheep in line. And trump is slipping.
Speaking of getting left behind, guess what else is getting left behind? Covid. Come this Summer and people can go back to life guess who's gonna get the credit. It ain't gonna be tRump, or the anti-vaxers it's gonna be Biden and the Dems that held the line.
And thanks to COVID you guys lost a shitload of people to that disease. The past six months just about everyone that COVID killed has been a Republican! Us dems? We got our shots. We ain't the ones asking for prayers, then the obligatory Go Fund Me afterwards. You killed too many of your voters. Dead people don't vote.... oh wait a minute.
Have you been keeping up with the Jan 6 committee? I have and I'd bet that about two months before the election they'll have a list of traitors and all the proof in black and white. Kinda hard to campaign after you try to overthrow the duly elected Government. And we'll get an inside look at how trump cheats everyone thanks to the NY Attorney General.
Under Biden the economy has added six million jobs. Best job creation since the "80's Unlike tRump who lost those jobs under his presidency. Somebody has to fix this mess trump left behind.
And let's look at how Biden handled your friends the Russians. Pulled NATO right together. tRump couldn't do that. tRump would have handed Ukraine to Putin for fifty dollars and a hand job.
People like free money taken from the pockets of the super rich. We can hold the house. Dems can gerrymander as well as Republicans. There are only 2 senators that need replacing, two new Dems and it's a whole new ball game.
one person (no, not even POTUS) can enact universal health care. that takes Congressional work/cooperation between parties...LOL! as if! plus, it takes everyone working together to fight a pandemic. haven't seen that here either, lol. "drone strikes" is plural. how many has he authorized lately? last ISIS leader killed offed himself and family rather than be captured. when did Biden say that HE was going to cure cancer? wasn't that more akin to Kennedy's promise for us (as a nation) to go to the moon? THAT didn't happen overnight either. progress IS being made, if one but looks for it. misleading rhetorical description, WAY oversimplified for the intended "audience"...
Yeah, I don't buy that little "fact" about the suicide vest. Not even a little. These are the same media stooges and "intelligence officials" that lied us into 2 decades long wars.
They've cried "wolf" too long and too loud for me to believe anything they have to say.
We forget so quickly. Obamacare was passed with 58 dem votes and 2 independent votes. The reason they needed 60 votes is all the republicans filibustered the bill. Get that? ZERO republican votes! There was no cooperation between parties, the Democrats did that all by themselves. Republicans offered nothing, if they had their way it wouldn't exist.
Republicans fighting a Pandemic? Fuckers are all anti-vax! Don't want to wear a mask, going out sick like Palin? Or that nutbag governor in North Dakota? Or Texas? Or Florida? The crazy is on the Republican Trumplican Party, there is no bothisms here.
The Terrorist is dead and Trumpistas want to split hairs on how he died? That's called reaching. If it happened under trump they would be celebrating.
And Biden didn't say he was going to cure cancer. He wanted to get them the money to do the research. Just like Kennedy did. But somebody has to lead the way.
And if you want to hear about an oversimplified message you need to go no further than trumps "I alone can fix this".
Last edited:
LMAO.....you got all that from my little post ?
You sound intelligent enuff to recognize sarcasm.
My orange God ?
You guys ?
Your friends the Russians?
I couldn't care less about this administration,or the next administration, or the government in general.
On the other side of the coin from watching what little so called NEWS inbetween my shifts taking care of REPUBLICANS ? (I'll have to ask them to squeeze my hand once for dem,twice for repub)It would appear you are rather optimistic going forward in 2022 , and beyond.
In my best 'Liam Neeson' voice,GOOD LUCK !
"supposedly" the DoD has it on video, news organizations reported that Biden was watching the feed live, just like Obama etc supposedly watched bin Ladens last few moments. pictures show what was originally a 3 story building. story goes folks on ground floor bailed, 2nd story was Islamic member and family, and they refused to leave. 3rd floor was the guy they went looking for. military says he set off explosives rather than surrender. pictures show ground floor walls & floor and most of walls of 2nd story still there. a missile strike from drone would have leveled the building ...
In a statement issued Thursday, Austin noted the operation was designed and conducted to minimize civilian casualties. "We know that al-Qurayshi and others at his compound directly caused the deaths of women and children last night. But, given the complexity of this mission, we will take a look at the possibility our actions may also have resulted in harm to innocent people," Austin said
Plausible denial...let's roll that wonderful bean footage..
.and no a drone hellfire missile strike would not level a 3 story building
Hellfire missle strike
https://youtu.be/k0Vq6XU7T0s
Plausible denial...let's roll that wonderful bean footage..
.and no a drone hellfire missile strike would not level a 3 story building
Hellfire missle strike
https://youtu.be/k0Vq6XU7T0s
St. Phatty
Active member
That's just the Yin and Yang, a different version of Trump-humpers thinking Trump was qualified to be President.
I think all the Trump-humpers that own extra real estate should be forced to let Trump be the property manager.
give them a short-cut to bankruptcy court...
You know how many million and billionaires
have taken advantage of bankruptcy laws in the US? It's a safty net for people that have the balls to go big...or a do over for some who fuck it up
and it can only happen here in America...the leader of million and billionaires worldwide
have taken advantage of bankruptcy laws in the US? It's a safty net for people that have the balls to go big...or a do over for some who fuck it up
and it can only happen here in America...the leader of million and billionaires worldwide
https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-m...ter-bidens-shenanigans-are-real-news?ref=home
You Might Not Like It, but Hunter Biden’s Shenanigans Are Real News
The 1980s TV crime drama Hunter featured an eponymous main character who popularized the catchphrase, “Works for me.” Today’s crime drama surrounding Hunter Biden evokes a different repeated utterance: “Who did Hunter work for?”
The troubled presidential scion is in the news again and raising questions about his father, President Joe Biden. This unwanted attention has also renewed questions about the media’s relative lack of interest in the younger Biden’s highly questionable business interests during the 2020 presidential election.
Last week, Politico reported: “The New York Times is still digging into Hunter Biden’s business relationships.” The Gray Lady sued the State Department to get emails about Hunter Biden that were sent or received by the US Embassy in Romania. It will be interesting to see what, if anything, these new emails reveal.
Although it garnered more attention on the right than in the mainstream media, last September, Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger, author of The Bidens, confirmed the validity of some of the controversial emails that surfaced during the 2020 campaign—including an email with a Chinese oil executive, referencing equity to be held for “the big guy.” (The big guy was Joe Biden, according to the recipient, Tony Bobulinski, a business partner of Hunter’s.)
Schreckinger also confirmed an email involving a Ukrainian business executive thanking Hunter for introducing him to his father at a dinner the previous night. (Joe Biden’s team denies the meeting.)
Meanwhile, conservative media is turning up the heat. Fox Nation is currently streaming a four-part series called Who Is Hunter Biden, and author Peter Schweizer just published a new book called Red-Handed, which alleges that the Biden family “received some $31 million from Chinese individuals who are linked to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence.” According to Schweizer, one of those individuals was investor Che Fung, who is referred to in emails by Hunter Biden as the ‘Superchairman.’” Schweizer also alleges that “Hunter Biden was paying his father’s bills with the foreign money…”
If true, these revelations dramatically advance the story from garden-variety corruption (Hunter Biden trading on his daddy’s name) to something much more nefarious.
But how reliable is Schweizer’s reporting? On one hand, he is the president of a think tank that was co-founded by Steve Bannon, and is, as The Guardian reports, “part of the rightwing ecosystem.” His conveniently timed book Clinton Cash (published in 2016), raised legitimate questions about Bill and Hillary Clinton, but also included omissions and errors.
On the other hand, Schweizer’s 2011 book Throw Them All Out took shots at both sides, and it sparked a 60 Minutes segment on how members of Congress cash in on insider information (which led to the creation of the STOCK Act).
In short, Schweizer’s books often reveal important and overlooked information, but his motives are suspicious. This raises a question: Rather than outsourcing this investigative work to Schweizer (whose goal is to feed his reporting to mainstream outlets), shouldn’t the media just do this work themselves?
Some, like Politico’s Schreckinger and The New York Times’ Ken Vogel, have spent considerable time doing just that. But let’s be honest, if this were any other president’s son, the coverage would have been through the roof.
Even without these post-election revelations and allegations, there was always an appearance of impropriety. We know Hunter was paid a lot of money to serve on the board of a Ukrainian gas company, apparently without ever visiting Ukraine and without any discernible expertise in the energy field. And his father just happened to be the point man there for the Obama administration.
We also now know that Hunter has become an artist, with some of his paintings fetching upwards of $500,000.
There’s a lot of juicy stuff here. So why didn’t this receive the coverage it might have deserved before Joe Biden was elected president? For one thing, Donald Trump—and his family—raised the bar for what qualifies as a newsworthy scandal, particularly when it comes to profiting off of the presidency.
And, to be honest, there were multiple red flags. Way back in May of 2019, it was reported that Rudy Giuliani was planning to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden in Ukraine. We also know that on a July 2019 phone call, Trump pressured the president of Ukraine to work with Giuliani on this project.
There was the not-implausible suggestion that this “October surprise” (the release of Hunter Biden’s emails) might be Russian disinformation (as former intel officials said).
Further fueling skepticism, the email story first dropped in a tabloid, the New York Post, and one of the reporters refused to allow his byline to be included in the story, while another reporter only discovered that her byline was included after the story was published.
Serious mistakes were also made by Trump and his allies. The original plan was to have the Wall Street Journal break the email story. But Trump spooked them by bragging that they were working on “an important piece.” Giuliani also scooped their reporting by leaking documents to the New York Post—and Bobulinski, Hunter Biden’s former partner turned Trump campaign witness, got tired of waiting and made his case to Breitbart.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden continued to defend his son and vehemently deny any wrongdoing. I suspect there was also a natural hesitancy to go after Biden family members, especially considering the tragedies that they have endured.
I’ve just explained why the story didn’t get the attention it probably deserved in 2020, but what about in the future? By suing the State Department, The New York Times has signaled that they are serious about investigating the new Hunter Biden revelations. That’s a good start.
Media outlets and investigative reporters should pursue new allegations and leads aggressively, regardless of where that takes them. They shouldn’t let their fear or dislike of Trump guide their reporting.
The credibility of the media is at stake. And in the unlikely event that (as Schweizer’s reporting would suggest) Joe Biden has been compromised by a foreign government, the stakes are a lot higher than that.
You Might Not Like It, but Hunter Biden’s Shenanigans Are Real News
The 1980s TV crime drama Hunter featured an eponymous main character who popularized the catchphrase, “Works for me.” Today’s crime drama surrounding Hunter Biden evokes a different repeated utterance: “Who did Hunter work for?”
The troubled presidential scion is in the news again and raising questions about his father, President Joe Biden. This unwanted attention has also renewed questions about the media’s relative lack of interest in the younger Biden’s highly questionable business interests during the 2020 presidential election.
Last week, Politico reported: “The New York Times is still digging into Hunter Biden’s business relationships.” The Gray Lady sued the State Department to get emails about Hunter Biden that were sent or received by the US Embassy in Romania. It will be interesting to see what, if anything, these new emails reveal.
Although it garnered more attention on the right than in the mainstream media, last September, Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger, author of The Bidens, confirmed the validity of some of the controversial emails that surfaced during the 2020 campaign—including an email with a Chinese oil executive, referencing equity to be held for “the big guy.” (The big guy was Joe Biden, according to the recipient, Tony Bobulinski, a business partner of Hunter’s.)
Schreckinger also confirmed an email involving a Ukrainian business executive thanking Hunter for introducing him to his father at a dinner the previous night. (Joe Biden’s team denies the meeting.)
Meanwhile, conservative media is turning up the heat. Fox Nation is currently streaming a four-part series called Who Is Hunter Biden, and author Peter Schweizer just published a new book called Red-Handed, which alleges that the Biden family “received some $31 million from Chinese individuals who are linked to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence.” According to Schweizer, one of those individuals was investor Che Fung, who is referred to in emails by Hunter Biden as the ‘Superchairman.’” Schweizer also alleges that “Hunter Biden was paying his father’s bills with the foreign money…”
If true, these revelations dramatically advance the story from garden-variety corruption (Hunter Biden trading on his daddy’s name) to something much more nefarious.
But how reliable is Schweizer’s reporting? On one hand, he is the president of a think tank that was co-founded by Steve Bannon, and is, as The Guardian reports, “part of the rightwing ecosystem.” His conveniently timed book Clinton Cash (published in 2016), raised legitimate questions about Bill and Hillary Clinton, but also included omissions and errors.
On the other hand, Schweizer’s 2011 book Throw Them All Out took shots at both sides, and it sparked a 60 Minutes segment on how members of Congress cash in on insider information (which led to the creation of the STOCK Act).
In short, Schweizer’s books often reveal important and overlooked information, but his motives are suspicious. This raises a question: Rather than outsourcing this investigative work to Schweizer (whose goal is to feed his reporting to mainstream outlets), shouldn’t the media just do this work themselves?
Some, like Politico’s Schreckinger and The New York Times’ Ken Vogel, have spent considerable time doing just that. But let’s be honest, if this were any other president’s son, the coverage would have been through the roof.
Even without these post-election revelations and allegations, there was always an appearance of impropriety. We know Hunter was paid a lot of money to serve on the board of a Ukrainian gas company, apparently without ever visiting Ukraine and without any discernible expertise in the energy field. And his father just happened to be the point man there for the Obama administration.
We also now know that Hunter has become an artist, with some of his paintings fetching upwards of $500,000.
There’s a lot of juicy stuff here. So why didn’t this receive the coverage it might have deserved before Joe Biden was elected president? For one thing, Donald Trump—and his family—raised the bar for what qualifies as a newsworthy scandal, particularly when it comes to profiting off of the presidency.
And, to be honest, there were multiple red flags. Way back in May of 2019, it was reported that Rudy Giuliani was planning to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden in Ukraine. We also know that on a July 2019 phone call, Trump pressured the president of Ukraine to work with Giuliani on this project.
There was the not-implausible suggestion that this “October surprise” (the release of Hunter Biden’s emails) might be Russian disinformation (as former intel officials said).
Further fueling skepticism, the email story first dropped in a tabloid, the New York Post, and one of the reporters refused to allow his byline to be included in the story, while another reporter only discovered that her byline was included after the story was published.
Serious mistakes were also made by Trump and his allies. The original plan was to have the Wall Street Journal break the email story. But Trump spooked them by bragging that they were working on “an important piece.” Giuliani also scooped their reporting by leaking documents to the New York Post—and Bobulinski, Hunter Biden’s former partner turned Trump campaign witness, got tired of waiting and made his case to Breitbart.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden continued to defend his son and vehemently deny any wrongdoing. I suspect there was also a natural hesitancy to go after Biden family members, especially considering the tragedies that they have endured.
I’ve just explained why the story didn’t get the attention it probably deserved in 2020, but what about in the future? By suing the State Department, The New York Times has signaled that they are serious about investigating the new Hunter Biden revelations. That’s a good start.
Media outlets and investigative reporters should pursue new allegations and leads aggressively, regardless of where that takes them. They shouldn’t let their fear or dislike of Trump guide their reporting.
The credibility of the media is at stake. And in the unlikely event that (as Schweizer’s reporting would suggest) Joe Biden has been compromised by a foreign government, the stakes are a lot higher than that.
"and in the unlikely event" yup. every president from here on out will really have to work at it to be considered "corrupt" after The Chumps brief reign of incompetence...if ANY POTUS could be looked at as if they had been compromised, it will ALWAY be The Chump & his financial entanglements with Russian "bankers" and mobsters/govt officials. but, i repeat myself, lol. those are all one & the same in Russia...
And they've already recanted due to backlash.
Cancel the Trucker's
IRS has already abandoned their facial recognition plans due to uproar from all points of the political compass. a MASSIVE overreach...i have no doubt that they will try again some day, however. there has never been an invasive govt surveillance plan so outlandish & illegal that some dimwit fuckhead didn't think "hey, that's a GREAT idea..."
