What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

It's the Climate, stupid

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
we are the only species (so far) that could destroy earth. as a place where life can flourish, anyway. we could easily knock it back to where rats, mice, cockroaches, ants, coyotes, certain fish etc might be all that is left...
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
we are the only species (so far) that could destroy earth. as a place where life can flourish, anyway. we could easily knock it back to where rats, mice, cockroaches, ants, coyotes, certain fish etc might be all that is left...

Termites don't forget termites!

My thoughts are along the lines of the 50's huge radioactive insects.

That way maybe you could get some real meat.
 

Three Berries

Active member
sm6ube9kffja1.jpg
You happy?
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
I remember the wildfires.

I don't need proof because they were covered by multiple sources and I know plenty of people in California that would tell you that it was hell and not climate hype.

I also figure you are going to have trust issues with anyone from California.
 

Three Berries

Active member
While we might not all be aware, the discrepancy between the term "biggest source of" and the overall percentage statistic should suggest further questions.

Perhaps you could postulate a possible motive for such promulgation...?
Maybe quit spending so much time looking up big words and read the article.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Ok I'm going to suggest one...

What if fifty one percent of a nation's energy production comes from mostly another source?

Why would anyone benefit from skewing the numbers??

:chin:
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top