moose eater
Well-known member
Do you believe that the automobiles of the 1930s display the same efficiency as the automobiles made in the New Millenium? Because it seems like you're saying that the shortcomings of the current sources or methods of green energy are as good as it gets, and there's no use in furthering that effort; it's all it'll ever be.If all you got is windmills and solar panels they yes why even bother. Both need 100% load backup from somewhere, and batteries isn't it either. And if either were a viable source for full time use there would be no need for subsidies.
I'm all for renewable that is local or individual level but we aren't there yet for utility wide scale. Let me know when they start using Tesla's patents. or beam energy from space.
And then you still are dependent on the feed coming to your house or business. In the end electricity is not an primary energy source as it always needs some other means to be generated and cannot be easily stored. You will be at the mercy of the electric company.
If you lived around the windfarms you would not want them either. Same with the transmission lines. In Illinois it's up the county zoning.
To accept that would be to deny history, and the development of nearly every form of tech we've ever had the opportunity to study the evolution of.