0.2 isn't 500ppmWith a ec 0.2/ ppm 500 (tds) your water is very hard and shouldn't be used. Your meter has already helped to tell your water is too hard to use.
Friend now is the time to explore all the different liquid readings with every liquid you use. If you test everything all the time you will learn what's what. I prefer using ppm instead of EC because it is much easier. Test the runoff and all the different waters with different feeds and you will learn what the plants like. Your smart. Good luck.
1st LED ?hey .. thanks for all your help so far- i ordered and received today the blue 'truncheon' that measures ec/ppm - the ph meter has not arrived
i tested my plain water n it registers... ec 0.2/ ppm 500 (tds) , ppm 700 (ec x 700)
i made up a mixture of the foxfarm nutes and the reading was
ec - between 3.0/3.2- so between a ppm 500 (tds) of 1500/1600 , ppm 700 (ec x 700) of 2100/2240...
as u can see i have no clue, not an idea what these numbers mean... as the drowning man yells...
H E L P....
Sorry I didn't see the .2 I just saw 2., I don't know about EC I mostly use TDS in ppm. When I see ppm at 500 on my meter I say that's way high.0.2 isn't 500ppm
0.2 is about 100-150ppm. Depending on the salts you are measuring.
0.2 is soft-moderate. Any lower and you need feeds aimed at low EC. As an example, Canna expect 0.2 - 0.4 from the tap. Any less, is when they will sell you their calmag agent to get it up in range.
I don't think the tap water sounds bad. Though all we can do is measure it's conductivity. Only a lab can tell us just what salts are giving us that reading. Thankfully, most water companies publish this data. Sometimes in great detail.
No pH meter is a problem. I have not checked the EC even once at this location, yet I mix a bucket every day. I would be screwed without my pH meter though.
The idea is to water very slowly and only test the very first runoff.ok , i just watered the plant with plain water , about 1/2 gallon, and tested the runoff - it was flashing on the wand ppm700 between the 140 and the 280 mark- which is way lower then the nute mixture ... opinions????
i guess its hard to give def guidance till i get the ph meter later this week...
holy shit.... i'm growing 6 diff types of plants, n the runoff was all over the scale, from a low of 200, to 1860- holy shit... the plants showing the problems tho were in the 300-400 range... i wish the ph meter would come sooner...The idea is to water very slowly and only test the very first runoff.
Hungry. N,K, Ca feed. Omit mg and p for couple feeds. Equal ppms k and ca.holy shit.... i'm growing 6 diff types of plants, n the runoff was all over the scale, from a low of 200, to 1860- holy shit... the plants showing the problems tho were in the 300-400 range... i wish the ph meter would come sooner...
1860 PPM on a 700 scale would be 2.6 EC.i'm growing 6 diff types of plants, n the runoff was all over the scale, from a low of 200, to 1860
You can't lock out nitrogen. And if your adding N you need Calcium. At this stage they'll begin calling for more k too. If he can look at his roots it would tell us a bit more now.I wouldn't until u know where the pH is. U have lockout not deficiency.
I'm really having to add the K after the stretch along with CAN for the calcium.You can't lock out nitrogen. And if your adding N you need Calcium. At this stage they'll begin calling for more k too. If he can look at his roots it would tell us a bit more now.