The quote he posted appears to be from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0981942820301728Where might one access the info pertaining to LED's lowering the THC content please?
But the comments not all related to it.
The quote he posted appears to be from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0981942820301728Where might one access the info pertaining to LED's lowering the THC content please?
Thank-you!The quote he posted appears to be from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0981942820301728
But the comments not all related to it.
LOLNowhere, the guy is in state of psychotic disorder. Nothing he wrote there makes any sense. I don't know why he uses words that he doesn't understand.
They have some interesting new data that above 5-600ppfd, green can help photosynthesis, especially deep in the canopy where other wavelengths don’t reach.i'm gunna have to find the artical, but IR far red light penetrates the canopy better than any other useable spectrum. (similar to Green spectrum, but this plant doesn't seem to use too much in green spectrum)
there was also a nasa experiment that not all their crops benifeted from far red IR some did, some did not.. I ponder how this effect may complexify with the vasty array of hybrids and landrace recombinations available.
i wonder where that line of where too much is and where enough is, you've got hortilux investing in far red IR lamps and led panels. so there has to be something too it if they are jumping on board.