What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::

Status
Not open for further replies.

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Wormtongue ticklin’ your eardrums again...

Grown man like you oughta be ashamed to suck that shit in, but I guess it makes you feel real good, huh? I guess that 2000 years of enslaving and murdering “heretics” and “dissenters” and conquered populations have done their work in reducing the incidence of independent minds: sheep searching for a shepherd who’s as bad as the wolves they fear, never wonder about the intentions of the shepherd that finds them


Where are the facts?What exactly are you having a disagreement with? Lets have a debate.



Liberals can never explain themselves. They tend to be very uneducated, or educated in the wrong things through mainstream media manipulation. :smoke:




https://www.infowars.com/white-liberal-says-white-people-are-100-the-problem/


White Liberal Says White People Are 100% The Problem

Protestor says she knows more about black community because she’s liberal

Infowars.com - November 22, 2019 Comments





Host Will Johnson met a Democrat who said white people are ‘100% the problem’ during a Trump rally in Austin, Texas. She went on to tell Johnson that she knows more about the black community than he does.

https://www.infowars.com/this-sort-of-thing-is-my-bag-baby-by-fiona-hill/


This Sort of Thing Is My Bag, Baby – By Fiona Hill

Democrats’ star witness caught in major lie

Darrin McBreen | Infowars.com - November 22, 2019 Comments





Despite testifying otherwise during the latest impeachment inquiry, Fiona Hill is most definitely a globalist, leftist, Soros operative.

https://www.infowars.com/nyt-names-...inal-investigation-for-fabricating-fisa-docs/


NYT Names FBI “Resistance” Lawyer Under Criminal Investigation For Fabricating FISA Docs

Kevin Clinesmith worked on Hillary Clinton email investigation and Russia probe, was on Robert Mueller’s team

Zero Hedge - November 23, 2019 11 Comments





The New York Times has revealed that the “low-level lawyer” under criminal investigation for allegedly doctoring materials used to obtain renewals of the Carter Page surveillance warrant is Kevin Clinesmith – who worked on both the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe, was part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, and interviewed Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos.
Clinesmith, a 37-year-old graduate of Georgetown Law, “took an email from an official at another federal agency that contained several factual assertions, then added material to the bottom that looked like another assertion from the email’s author, when it was instead his own understanding,” according to the report.
Mr. Clinesmith included this altered email in a package that he compiled for another F.B.I. official to read in preparation for signing an affidavit that would be submitted to the court attesting to the facts and analysis in the wiretap application.
The details of the email are apparently classified and may not be made public even when the report is unveiled. -New York Times
In other words, we won’t get to see whatever the FBI used to trick the FISA court into granting Page’s renewals.
Clinesmith, a former attorney with the FBI’s National Security and Cyber Law Branch while working under FBI’s top lawyer, James Baker, resigned two months ago after he was interviewed by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horrowitz’s office. Horrowitz in turn sent a criminal referral to US Attorney John Durham, who was tasked with investigating the Obama DOJ’s conduct surrounding the 2016 US election.
The referral appears to at least be part of the reason that Durham’s inquiry was elevated from an administrative review to a criminal investigation, according to the report. The findings are set to be revealed on December 9, when Horowitz will release his long-awaited report, which Trump’s allies believe will reveal an effort to undermine his 2016 campaign.
In addition to Clinesmith’s fabricated FISA evidence, the FBI used an unverified dossier from former British spy Christopher Steele, paid for in part by the Clinton campaign via law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS, in their pursuit of Carter Page. The agency has claimed in court filings that the Steele Dossier was not used in warrant appplications, affidavits or courtroom evidene – but was used in “criminal proceedings.”
The Conservative Treehouse notes of Clinesmith:
(1) While Clinesmith, as a normal function of his FBI job, did not report to Peter Strzok, when the teams were assembled for MYE, Crossfire Hurricane, and Robert Mueller investigation, Clinesmith DID work directly for Peter Strzok. When the teams were selected, Kevin Clinesmith reported to Peter Strzok. Therefore when the inappropriate behavior was identified; and when the action of manipulating FISA evidence was done; Kevin Clinesmith was reporting directly to FBI supervisory agent Peter Strzok.
(2) Kevin Clinesmith remained in the FBI during the entirety of the Horowitz investigation. He was not released until the investigation was complete and the draft report was submitted. So the FBI knew they had a problem with Clinesmith back in February of 2018 and he was allowed to continue work until September of this year. It would seem obvious he was being monitored.
(3) Clinesmith’s status during the investigation aligns with another Main Justice employee also connected to the FISA process who was similarly in position throughout and also left in September 2019. That would be Tashina Guahar.
According to the Washington Post, however, Horowitz has concluded that the altered email “did not affect the overall validity of the surveillance application.”
Mr. Trump’s allies have complained about how the Justice Department used information from the Steele dossier in the wiretap applications. Along with evidence from other sources, the filings cited some information from Mr. Steele’s dossier about meetings that Mr. Page was rumored to have had with Kremlin representatives during a trip to Russia that year.

Still, people familiar with questions asked by Mr. Horowitz’s investigators have suggested that he is likely to conclude that the filings exaggerated Mr. Steele’s track record in terms of the amount of value that the F.B.I. derived from information he supplied in previous investigations. The court filings in the Page wiretap application said his material was “used in criminal proceedings,” but it was never part of an affidavit, search warrant or courtroom evidence. -New York Times
The Times has suggested that Horowitz will criticize FBI officials involved in the investigations but will ultimately absolve them of wrongdoing.
What’s more, the Times says that Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud – a self-professed member of the Clinton Foundation who fed Papadopoulos the rumor that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton, was “not an FBI informant.”
The Times is using purposefully misleading language here, as Mifsud was never accused of being an FBI asset.



Viva la resistance
Clinesmith was identified by Horowitz as one of several FBI officials who harbored animus towards President Trump, after which he was kicked off the Mueller Russia investigation in February 2018. Two other FBI officials removed for similar reasons were Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, both of whom also worked on the Clinton and Trump investigations, and both of whom have similarly left the bureau.
On November 9, 2016 – the day after Trump won the election, Clinesmith texted another FBI employee “My god damned name is all over the legal documents investigating his staff,” adding “So, who knows if that breaks to him what he is going to do.”
Then on November 22, 2016, he said “Hell no” when asked by another FBI attorney if he had changed his views on Trump.
“Viva la resistance,” he added.
i-am-numb_1_0.jpg

When asked to explain himself, Clinesmith told Horowitz: “It’s just the, the lines bled through here just in terms of, of my personal, political view in terms of, of what particular preference I have,” adding “But, but that doesn’t have any, any leaning on the way that I, I maintain myself as a professional in the FBI.”
A professional document fabricator. We’re sure he’ll be a GoFundMe millionaire by tomorrow.

The knowledge that a FBI official altered a document, which led to the surveillance of the Trump campaign, went all the way to “the top” of the Obama administration, President Trump said on Friday.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Originally Posted by TychoMonolyth
People use freedom of speech as a shield when they're breaking the law.
[/FONT]


What do you mean by that? Please, give me an example.


You don't think free speech is a natural right that cannot be taken away? Why?


I will ask you again.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/fbi-lawyer...e-also-altered-russia-probe-documents-report/


FBI Lawyer Who Sent Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’ Text Message Also Altered Russia Probe Documents: Report

‘I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,’ lawyer texted in regards to Trump victory

Chuck Ross | Daily Caller News Foundation - November 22, 2019 20 Comments





The former FBI lawyer who is reportedly under investigation for altering documents in the Russia probe took part in a 2017 interview with Trump adviser George Papadopoulos, and also wrote anti-Trump text messages that were revealed in a Justice Department report released last year.
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith altered an email that was included in an FBI application to renew a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Carter Page, according to The New York Times.
Investigators working in the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general (OIG) discovered the email as part of an investigation into whether the FBI abused the FISA process.
A report of the investigation is set to be released Dec. 9.
People briefed on the report said it will fault the FBI for carelessness and unprofessionalism in how investigators conducted the investigation, according to The NYT. But it will stop short of accusing FBI leaders of acting out of anti-Trump bias. The report will also say that the FBI met the low legal threshold to obtain FISA warrants against Page.
But the allegations against Clinesmith are unlikely to alleviate Republican concerns of anti-Trump bias during the investigation.
Clinesmith added material to the bottom of an email from an official at another government agency that was included in a FISA renewal application, according to The NYT. Clinesmith included the email in an affidavit that was presented to another FBI official to sign as part of the process to submit the renewal application.
CNN reported Thursday night that an unidentified FBI official was under investigation in the matter. Michael Horowitz, the inspector general, referred the lawyer, since identified as Clinesmith, to federal prosecutors as part of a criminal investigation.
Clinesmith resigned from the FBI two months ago following an interview with Horowitz’s team, The NYT reported. He was removed from the special counsel’s investigation in February 2018 after the OIG found text messages he wrote criticizing Trump.
An inspector general’s report released on June 14, 2018, found that an FBI lawyer identified as Clinesmith sent another FBI official a text message on Nov. 9, 2016 lamenting Trump’s election victory.
“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” Clinesmith wrote in the text.
Clinesmith also expressed concerns about Trump’s election win because of the lawyer’s role investigating the campaign.
“Plus, my god damned name is all over the legal documents investigating his staff,” wrote Clinesmith, who is referred to as “FBI Attorney 2” in the June 2018 report.
In a Nov. 22, 2016 text message discussion about Trump, Clinesmith wrote: “Viva le Resistance!”
A spokesman for the special counsel’s team downplayed Clinesmith’s role on the investigation when contacted last year by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The spokesman described Clinessmith as having an administrative role.
But the OIG report released last year described Clinesmith as the “primary FBI attorney” on the Trump-Russia investigation in early 2017.
George Papadopoulos, the former Trump campaign aide, told The Daily Caller News Foundation that Clinesmith was part of the FBI team that interviewed him on Feb. 16, 2017.
 

TychoMonolyth

Boreal Curing
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Originally Posted by TychoMonolyth [URL=https://www.icmag.com/ic/images/buttons/viewpost.gif]View Image[/URL]
People use freedom of speech as a shield when they're breaking the law.
[/FONT]





I will ask you again.
Of course it can be taken away. And it should. You think you're free to say whatever you want? Post an ad in any news paper saying you want to shoot the president. See how long it takes for them to ship you off to a black site. On us soil too boot.

You can't just say anything you want. It doesn't matter if it's a legislative law or natural law. Tell me you're going to shoot me and I'll cut your throat. That's natural.

So tell us again how free speech can protect you? There are all sorts of laws they can use to lock you up. Hate speech. Uttering threats. Hell, even terrorists charges.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I think you misunderstand US Law. Its alright, american citizens understand the law and how it is applied according to the United States Constitution.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
What is hate speech? That is a term that has been misused to include whatever the left doesn't agree with. The establishment uses the term 'hate speech' to put activists into a category and silence them when no crime or harm has been committed.
 
C

Capra ibex

How is infringing on a natural right such as freedom of speech a good idea again? Shouldn't everyone have a right to speak their mind? The people can determine the truth for themselves.

You obviously didn't listen to it, he explains exactly what he means.

But i suspect you are beyond reach anyway, so enjoy your Alex Jones.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
You obviously didn't listen to it, he explains exactly what he means.

But i suspect you are beyond reach anyway, so enjoy your Alex Jones.


Listen to what? Did I miss something?


First amendment doesnt protect against threats of violence. I think everyone understands that. Is that what you are talking about?
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/why-america-is-becoming-more-divided/


https://youtu.be/k9r97RopEg0


Why America Is Becoming More Divided

Mainstream media is fueling political rift within country

Millie Weaver | Infowars.com - November 23, 2019 Comments





Millie Weaver goes to a Trump rally in Lexington, Kentucky to talk to both Trump supporters and anti-Trump protesters.
Mainstream media news outlets have promoted fear, disinformation, and hatred amongst Americans causing an artificial rift in the nation. Both sides seem now unwilling to have dialog and discussion with one another while rumors of civil war stir.
Are we going to cowardly allow the media to make our neighbors our enemies over political differences? Be courageous and extend an olive branch.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
I don’t see a problem.I just don’t read the crap.
It’s just spam.
Cut and paste.
I doubt if anybody reads it.
 
C

Capra ibex

Listen to what? Did I miss something?


First amendment doesnt protect against threats of violence. I think everyone understands that. Is that what you are talking about?

You seemed to say that the video i posted was infringing on free speech, it was not.

It was talking about that 'free speech' does not mean that you are free to say anything to anyone at any time without any repercussions.
And that 'free speech' does not mean that you have the right to broadcast ANYTHING to anyone, that there needs to be some form of regulation and accountability.
It is not either or, it has to be somewhere in the middle.

Like Facebook, Youtube, Twitter etc., should not be able to just provide a platform and have no responsibility to police it in some way.
It is NOT as simple as 'either-or' it is a complicated situation, that needs complicated rules.
It will get much worse in the future if it isn't worked on right now.

How would you feel if someone made a 'deep-fake' video OF YOU and said that you are a proud child rapist (or whatever) and managed to catch a cult following, is that free speech?
And nothing should be done about it?

Or if they made a deep-fake of Donald Trump telling people to go out and kill anyone that they see of colour or anyone that says anything bad about him, and that they will be pardoned if they are taken by police, would that be fine?
That type of thing is like an extreme level of hate speech.

With great power comes great responsibility.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/sacha-baro...h-purge-and-adl-takeover-of-all-social-media/


Sacha Baron Cohen Calls For Global Free Speech “Purge” and ADL Takeover of All Social Media

Issues censorship battle plan to purge all non ADL-approved speech and arrest Big Tech heads who don’t comply

Infowars.com - November 24, 2019 Comments





“A combine of ruthless international corporations have camouflaged themselves as liberal victims of an impending second Holocaust, when in reality, the ADL now nests firmly in a metastasizing complex of expansionist global domination that represents the greatest threat to free humanity.” – Alex Jones
Sasha Baron Cohen has declared war on freedom during an ADL summit on Thursday, calling for more online censorship against conservative news outlets, Alex Jones, and the Trump administration in the name of combatting “hate speech.”
“Today, around the world, demagogues appeal to our worst instincts. Conspiracy theories, once confined to the fringe, are going mainstream,” Baron Cohen said.

“Democracy, which depends on shared truths, is in retreat, and autocracy, which depends on shared lies, is on the march,” he continued. “Hate crimes are surging, as are murderous attacks on religious and ethnic minorities. Now what do all these dangerous trends have in common? I’m just a comedian, an actor, I’m not a scholar, but one thing is pretty clear to me: all this hate and violence is being facilitated by a handful of internet companies that amount to the greatest propaganda machine in history.”
Cohen then asserted that Big Tech CEOs should be held personally liable if they fail to censor conservative thought leaders.
“By now, it’s pretty clear they cannot be trusted to regulate themselves,” Cohen said, adding that punishing tech companies should be an option. “Do it again, and you’ll go to jail.”
Despite the universal ban against Alex Jones, Cohen complained that his reach is still too widespread and criticized Big Tech for not doing enough to silence Infowars.
“Facebook, YouTube, Google, Twitter, and others, they reach billions of people,” Cohen said. “The algorithms these platforms depend on deliberately amplify the type of content that keeps users engaged. Stories that appeal to our baser instincts and that trigger outrage and fear. It’s why YouTube recommended videos by the conspiracist Alex Jones billions of times.”
“British voters will go to the polls while online conspiracists promote the despicable theory of the Great Replacement, that white Christians are being deliberately replaced by Muslim immigrants. Americans will vote for president while trolls and bots perpetuate the disgusting lie of a Hispanic invasion. And after years of YouTube videos calling climate change a hoax, the United States is on track a year from now to formally withdraw from the Paris Accords,” he added.
Cohen then called for a “purge” of anybody who doesn’t fall in line with the ADL’s talking points.
“There is such a thing as objective truth. Facts do exist,” Cohen said. “And if these internet companies really want to make a difference, they should hire enough monitors to actually monitor, work closely with groups like the ADL, insist on facts and purge these lies and conspiracies from their platforms.”
Cohen’s dishonest remarks completely fly in the face of the First Amendment and conveniently ignore the constant Fake News and division spouted by the mainstream media.
From Alex Jones:
Make no mistake, washed-up race war instigator Sasha Baron Cohen, despite having the full backing of Hollywood, has less than 300K followers on Twitter. Cohen, when he spoke from inside an ADL propaganda station, was reading off a script provided to him by the ADL.
Every sentence from his 20+ minute script-reading was directly out of the battle plans of the globalists, not just to silence free speech and disarm the people of the United States, but to put in place a tyrannical corporate technocracy world government – tracking and tracing and surveilling every human’s activities and punishing everyone that doesn’t conform to the nightmare social construct of the ChiComs and their leftist allies. He goes on to say there needs to be a global purge against thought crime. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Hitler/Stalin/Mao 2.0. He calls everyone who doesn’t agree ADL 100% and submit to their authoritarian ideology Nazis.
In perhaps the only part of the speech Cohen may have had a hand in writing, he tells the audience of enthusiastic would-be tyrant overlords that this is the only time he’s ever given a speech with the real persona of Sasha Baron Cohen. The stench of authoritarian danger was radiating from the archetypal Count Dracula lookalike. The cover of the book doesn’t disappoint when he gets into the text that is 100% Deep State/Chinese social score/Southern Poverty Law Center/ADL talking points, the true embodiment of 200 proof evil.
Almost every sentence of the speech is well-known propaganda salvos launched by globalist organizations dedicated to annihilating classical liberal institutions. Not even Hitler said the things like ‘we need to globally purge people for their views and we’re going to arrest all the industry heads who don’t comply with us,’ then demanding that more censors be hired, leaving out of course the fact the ADL with the Southern Poverty Law Center are already getting paid by Big Tech for their authoritarian expertise hundreds of millions a year.
A combine of ruthless international corporations have camouflaged themselves as liberal victims of an impending second Holocaust, when in reality, the ADL now nests firmly in a metastasizing complex of expansionist global domination that represents the greatest threat to free humanity.
All that is good is once again under attack and fighting for its life. War is not coming. The war is here.
Watch Cohen’s full speech below:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top