:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::

[Gry]

Can't help but wonder how much news has been buried by injected chaos sites.

 

[pipeline]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmXWg2tLaes


OAN Investigates: Biden Family Corruption with Neil W. McCabe

7,171 views
•Oct 14, 2019





881 8 Share Save


One America News Network






469K subscribers
One America News presents an in-depth report on corruption by former Vice President Joe Biden and his family. Tune in Saturday, October 19th & Sunday, October 20th at 11AM PST / 2PM EST!

 

[h.h.]

Trouble is, all it is, is added to. Complete fabrication from the onset.

Science is religion that has been proven. Complete fabrication on the onset. That’s how our imagination works. Some proves false. Some doesn’t. Some we will never prove either way.It’s a journey. Not an end product.

 

[beta]

This one's for Gypsy: If Prince Andrews was Pakistani
https://twitter.com/DoubleDownNews/status/1196740055085338624

 

[BadTicket]

So, this thread, kind of a mixed bag.. Bitter sweet at best.

Sure we could live without it, and without Alex Jones, but since we are on the Speakers Corner section of ICmag, which is like the dark/shady part of the city where people live 'cause the rent is cheap and visitors only come to score drugs and thing, knowing if they step foot there, they might be in for some shit. And the thread is clearly labelled "Infowars news thread", so you know what's coming.. And it does house the AJ stuff under one roof, which is a plus.. If this stuff upsets you, don't read it. Stay away!

It's not like a Saturday night at a comedy club where you bought a ticket expecting to see comedy, and instead of comedy you get Alex Jones on stage ranting about Mao and Stalin. Then when you tell Jones to fuck off from the stage 'cause he's ruining your evening, he starts calling you a pussy who is afraid of the truth and wants to start a fist fight.. 'Cause you know, that actually happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MNdfiBIuCc

So yea, Alex Jones may not be a reasonable man. These poor comedy club folks didn't have a choice but to hear his ranting. But to people getting upset reading this thread: You have the option not to read this stuff if it ruins your buzz. Surely not worth it..?
Walk away

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

What he said -

So, this thread, kind of a mixed bag.. Bitter sweet at best.

Sure we could live without it, and without Alex Jones, but since we are on the Speakers Corner section of ICmag, which is like the dark/shady part of the city where people live 'cause the rent is cheap and visitors only come to score drugs and thing, knowing if they step foot there, they might be in for some shit. And the thread is clearly labelled "Infowars news thread", so you know what's coming.. And it does house the AJ stuff under one roof, which is a plus.. If this stuff upsets you, don't read it. Stay away!

It's not like a Saturday night at a comedy club where you bought a ticket expecting to see comedy, and instead of comedy you get Alex Jones on stage ranting about Mao and Stalin. Then when you tell Jones to fuck off from the stage 'cause he's ruining your evening, he starts calling you a pussy who is afraid of the truth and wants to start a fist fight.. 'Cause you know, that actually happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MNdfiBIuCc

So yea, Alex Jones may not be a reasonable man. These poor comedy club folks didn't have a choice but to hear his ranting. But to people getting upset reading this thread: You have the option not to read this stuff if it ruins your buzz. Surely not worth it..?
Walk away

 

[Microbeman]

Science is religion that has been proven. Complete fabrication on the onset. That’s how our imagination works. Some proves false. Some doesn’t. Some we will never prove either way.It’s a journey. Not an end product.

Science is a series of questions and tests based on observations, not fabrication. Religion is fabricated out of a need or desire for control of other people. These fabrications are based on perceived gullibility related to explanations of the unknown.

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/video-masked-men-set-fire-to-epoch-times-hong-kong-printing-press/


Video: Masked Men Set Fire To Epoch Times’ Hong Kong Printing Press

Communist Party likely behind attack on free speech amid violent protests

Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - November 19, 2019 0 Comments





Four individuals wearing masks to conceal their identities stormed The Epoch Times’ Hong Kong printing press, threatened workers and set the facility on fire.
Armed with batons and dressed in all black, the men entered the building around 3:40 a.m. and told employees, “All of you don’t move!”
One man is seen tossing a liquid near printing press equipment and stacks of newspapers before another man uses a lighter to ignite the substance.
Surveillance footage shows the four men run off as soon as the flames erupt.
In total, “two print machines, four rolls of printing papers, and several stacks of newspapers,” were damaged during the blaze, according to The Epoch Times.
The attack is believed to be an attempt by the Communist Chinese Party (CCP) to silence the pro-Hong Kong freedom Epoch Times.
The newspaper’s Hong Kong spokesperson Cheryl Ng said, “The fact that two of the thugs dressed in black outfits which looks like the protesters is also view[ed] by us as CCP tactics trying to use people against people.”
This is the fourth attack on the location since its opening over a decade ago.
The ongoing situation in Hong Kong continues to escalate with around 100 protesters currently trapped inside the city’s Polytechnic University after a three-day siege by police.
The Black Friday sales have arrived early! Get up to 70% off our hottest products as well as free-shipping and double Patriot Points while the sale lasts!

 

[pipeline]

God is with us! I know Jesus and Jesus knows me. I am born again, free to live for the will of God. Bought with the blood of Jesus. There is only 1 truth.


John 6 New King James Version (NKJV)

Feeding the Five Thousand

6 After these things Jesus went over the Sea of Galilee, which is the Sea of Tiberias. 2 Then a great multitude followed Him, because they saw His signs which He performed on those who were diseased.[a] 3 And Jesus went up on the mountain, and there He sat with His disciples.
4 Now the Passover, a feast of the Jews, was near. 5 Then Jesus lifted up His eyes, and seeing a great multitude coming toward Him, He said to Philip, “Where shall we buy bread, that these may eat?” 6 But this He said to test him, for He Himself knew what He would do.
7 Philip answered Him, “Two hundred denarii worth of bread is not sufficient for them, that every one of them may have a little.”
8 One of His disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, said to Him, 9 “There is a lad here who has five barley loaves and two small fish, but what are they among so many?”
10 Then Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand. 11 And Jesus took the loaves, and when He had given thanks He distributed them [b]to the disciples, and the disciples to those sitting down; and likewise of the fish, as much as they wanted. 12 So when they were filled, He said to His disciples, “Gather up the fragments that remain, so that nothing is lost.” 13 Therefore they gathered them up, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves which were left over by those who had eaten. 14 Then those men, when they had seen the sign that Jesus did, said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.”
Jesus Walks on the Sea

15 Therefore when Jesus perceived that they were about to come and take Him by force to make Him king, He departed again to the mountain by Himself alone.
16 Now when evening came, His disciples went down to the sea, 17 got into the boat, and went over the sea toward Capernaum. And it was already dark, and Jesus had not come to them. 18 Then the sea arose because a great wind was blowing. 19 So when they had rowed about [c]three or four miles, they saw Jesus walking on the sea and drawing near the boat; and they were afraid. 20 But He said to them, “It is I; do not be afraid.” 21 Then they willingly received Him into the boat, and immediately the boat was at the land where they were going.
The Bread from Heaven

22 On the following day, when the people who were standing on the other side of the sea saw that there was no other boat there, except [d]that one [e]which His disciples had entered, and that Jesus had not entered the boat with His disciples, but His disciples had gone away alone— 23 however, other boats came from Tiberias, near the place where they ate bread after the Lord had given thanks— 24 when the people therefore saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they also got into boats and came to Capernaum, seeking Jesus. 25 And when they found Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, “Rabbi, when did You come here?”
26 Jesus answered them and said, “Most assuredly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled. 27 Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set His seal on Him.”
28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
30 Therefore they said to Him, “What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? 31 Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’ ”
32 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”
34 Then they said to Him, “Lord, give us this bread always.”
35 And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. 36 But I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. 37 All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will [f]by no means cast out. 38 For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39 This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”
Rejected by His Own

41 The Jews then [g]complained about Him, because He said, “I am the bread which came down from heaven.” 42 And they said, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that He says, ‘I have come down from heaven’?”
43 Jesus therefore answered and said to them, [h]“Do not murmur among yourselves. 44 No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. 45 It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Therefore everyone who [i]has heard and learned from the Father comes to Me. 46 Not that anyone has seen the Father, except He who is from God; He has seen the Father. 47 Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes [j]in Me has everlasting life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead. 50 This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world.”
52 The Jews therefore quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?”
53 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. 55 For My flesh is [k]food indeed, and My blood is [l]drink indeed. 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever.”
59 These things He said in the synagogue as He taught in Capernaum.
Many Disciples Turn Away

60 Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, “This is a [m]hard saying; who can understand it?”
61 When Jesus knew in Himself that His disciples [n]complained about this, He said to them, “Does this [o]offend you? 62 What then if you should see the Son of Man ascend where He was before? 63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who would betray Him. 65 And He said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by My Father.”
66 From that time many of His disciples went [p]back and walked with Him no more. 67 Then Jesus said to the twelve, “Do you also want to go away?”
68 But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 Also we have come to believe and know that You are the [q]Christ, the Son of the living God.”
70 Jesus answered them, “Did I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?” 71 He spoke of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, for it was he who would betray Him, being one of the twelve.



________________________________________________________________
Praise God! Thank you Jesus!





https://www.infowars.com/fbi-now-treating-epsteins-death-as-a-criminal-matter/




Video: FBI Now Investigating Epstein’s Death as a “Criminal Enterprise,” Says BoP Director

Bureau of Prisons director says FBI now treating Epstein’s mysterious death as a criminal matter

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com - November 19, 2019 44 Comments
Image Credits: Rick Friedman/Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis via Getty Images).





The FBI is now treating Jeffrey Epstein’s death as a criminal matter, according to
Bureau of Prisons Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer.
During a Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sawyer said the FBI is probing the possibility of a “criminal enterprise” involved in Epstein’s death.
Sawyer was responding to a question from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) who asked if the FBI was probing both the possibilities of a “major malfunction” and a “criminal enterprise” that attributed to Epstein’s death.

​

“The FBI is involved [in both possibilities] and they are looking into a criminal enterprise,” Sawyer responded.
Despite popular opinion that Epstein was murdered, it’s likely that federal investigators will first pivot to a belief that a “criminal enterprise” helped Epstein commit suicide.

Although, given the extreme irregularities surrounding his death – and the fact that prominent forensic expert Michael Baden believes Epstein was “strangulated” – the case could still break open into a murder investigation.
The fact that the FBI is now looking for signs of “criminal enterprise” – instead of just simoly sweeping the matter under the rug – is unprecedented.

From Sept 11th, 2017, Alex Jones and Roger Stone break down the reports that President Trump is slowly being poisoned, isolated and controlled by his Deep State handlers with the help of General Kelley and General McMaster.
The Black Friday sales have arrived early! Get up to 70% off our hottest products as well as free-shipping and double Patriot Points while the sale lasts!

 

[pipeline]

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3884/text

H. R. 3884​

To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.​

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES​

July 23, 2019​

Mr. Nadler (for himself, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Jeffries, Ms. Velázquez, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Correa, Ms. Dean, Mr. Deutch, Ms. Escobar, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Evans, Ms. Gabbard, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Khanna, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Norton, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. Pressley, Ms. Waters, and Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Agriculture, Education and Labor, Ways and Means, Small Business, Natural Resources, and Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned​

A BILL​

To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.​

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019” or the “MORE Act of 2019”.​

SEC. 2. Decriminalization of cannabis.​

(a) Cannabis removed from schedule of controlled substances.—
(1) REMOVAL IN STATUTE.—Subsection (c) of schedule I of section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) is amended—​

(A) by striking “(10) Marihuana.”; and
(B) by striking “(17) Tetrahydrocannabinols, except for tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp (as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946).”.

(2) REMOVAL FROM SCHEDULE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall finalize a rulemaking under section 201(a)(2) removing marihuana and tetrahydrocannabinols from the schedules of controlled substances. Marihuana and tetrahydrocannabinols shall each be deemed to be a drug or other substance that does not meet the requirements for inclusion in any schedule. A rulemaking under this paragraph shall be considered to have taken effect as of the date of enactment of this Act for purposes of any offense committed, case pending, conviction entered, and, in the case of a juvenile, any offense committed, case pending, and adjudication of juvenile delinquency entered before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.​

(b) Conforming amendments to controlled substances act.—The Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 102(44) (21 U.S.C. 802(44)), by striking “marihuana,”;​

(2) in section 401(b) (21 U.S.C. 841(b))—​

(A) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in subparagraph (A)—
(I) in clause (vi), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(II) by striking clause (vii); and
(III) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (vii);
(ii) in subparagraph (B)—
(I) in clause (vi), by inserting “or” after the semicolon;
(II) by striking clause (vii); and
(III) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (vii);
(iii) in subparagraph (C), in the first sentence, by striking “subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D)” and inserting “subparagraphs (A) and (B)”;
(iv) by striking subparagraph (D);
(v) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (D); and
(vi) in subparagraph (D)(i), as so redesignated, by striking “subparagraphs (C) and (D)” and inserting “subparagraph (C)”;
(B) by striking paragraph (4); and
(C) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;

(3) in section 402(c)(2)(B) (21 U.S.C. 842(c)(2)(B)), by striking “, marihuana,”;​

(4) in section 403(d)(1) (21 U.S.C. 843(d)(1)), by striking “, marihuana,”;​

(5) in section 418(a) (21 U.S.C. 859(a)), by striking the last sentence;​

(6) in section 419(a) (21 U.S.C. 860(a)), by striking the last sentence;​

(7) in section 422(d) (21 U.S.C. 863(d))—​

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “marijuana,”; and
(B) in paragraph (5), by striking “, such as a marihuana cigarette,”; and

(8) in section 516(d) (21 U.S.C. 886(d)), by striking “section 401(b)(6)” each place the term appears and inserting “section 401(b)(5)”.​

(c) Other conforming amendments.—
(1) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM DRUG CONTROL ACT OF 1986.—The National Forest System Drug Control Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 559b et seq.) is amended—​

(A) in section 15002(a) (16 U.S.C. 559b(a)) by striking “marijuana and other”;
(B) in section 15003(2) (16 U.S.C. 559c(2)) by striking “marijuana and other”; and
(C) in section 15004(2) (16 U.S.C. 559d(2)) by striking “marijuana and other”.

(2) INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS.—Section 2516 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—​

(A) in subsection (1)(e), by striking “marihuana,”; and
(B) in subsection (2) by striking “marihuana”.

(d) Retroactivity.—The amendments made by this section to the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are retroactive and shall apply to any offense committed, case pending, conviction entered, and, in the case of a juvenile, any offense committed, case pending, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency entered before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3. Demographic data of cannabis business owners and employees.​

(a) In general.—The Bureau of Labor Statistics shall regularly compile, maintain, and make public data on the demographics of—
(1) individuals who are business owners in the cannabis industry; and​

(2) individuals who are employed in the cannabis industry.​

(b) Demographic data.—The data collected under subsection (a) shall include data regarding—
(1) age;​

(2) certifications and licenses;​

(3) disability status;​

(4) educational attainment;​

(5) family and marital status;​

(6) nativity;​

(7) race and Hispanic ethnicity;​

(8) school enrollment;​

(9) veteran status; and​

(10) sex.​

(c) Confidentiality.—The name, address, and other identifying information of individuals employed in the cannabis industry shall be kept confidential by the Bureau and not be made available to the public.​

(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) CANNABIS.—The term “cannabis” means either marijuana or cannabis as defined under the State law authorizing the sale or use of cannabis in which the individual or entity is located.​

(2) CANNABIS INDUSTRY.—The term “cannabis industry” means an individual or entity that is licensed or permitted under a State or local law to engage in commercial cannabis-related activity.​

(3) OWNER.—The term “owner” means an individual or entity that is defined as an owner under the State or local law where the individual or business is licensed or permitted.
SEC. 4. Creation of Opportunity Trust Fund and imposition of tax on cannabis products.​

(a) Trust Fund.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subchapter A of chapter 98 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 9512. Opportunity trust fund.​

“(a) Creation of Trust Fund.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the ‘Opportunity Trust Fund’ (referred to in this section as the ‘Trust Fund’), consisting of such amounts as may be appropriated or credited to such fund as provided in this section or section 9602(b).​

“(b) Transfers to Trust Fund.—There are hereby appropriated to the Trust Fund amounts equivalent to the net revenues received in the Treasury from the tax imposed by section 5701(h).​

“(c) Expenditures.—Amounts in the Trust Fund shall be available, without further appropriation, only as follows:
“(1) 50 percent to the Attorney General to carry out section 3052(a) of part OO of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.​

“(2) 10 percent to the Attorney General to carry out section 3052(b) of part OO of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.​

“(3) 20 percent to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to carry out section 5(b)(1) of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019.​

“(4) 20 percent to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to carry out section 5(b)(2) of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019”..”.​

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 98 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new item:​

“Sec. 9512. Opportunity trust fund.”.

(b) Imposition of tax.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 5701 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i) and by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:

“(h) Cannabis products.—On cannabis products, manufactured in or imported into the United States, there shall be imposed a tax equal to 5 percent of the price for which sold.”.​

(2) CANNABIS PRODUCT DEFINED.—Section 5702 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(q) Cannabis product.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the term ‘cannabis product’ means any cannabis or any article which contains cannabis or any derivative thereof.​

“(2) EXCEPTION.—The term ‘cannabis product’ shall not include any medicine or drug that is a prescribed drug (as such term is defined in section 213(d)(3)).​

“(3) CANNABIS.—The term ‘cannabis’—​

“(A) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and
“(B) does not include—
“(i) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
“(ii) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.”.

(3) CANNABIS PRODUCTS TREATED AS TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Section 5702(c) of such Code is amended by striking “and roll-your-own tobacco” and inserting “roll-your-own tobacco, and cannabis products”.​

(4) MANUFACTURER OF CANNABIS PRODUCTS TREATED AS MANUFACTURER OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Section 5702 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(r) Manufacturer of cannabis products.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Any person who plants, cultivates, harvests, produces, manufactures, compounds, converts, processes, prepares, or packages any cannabis product shall be treated as a manufacturer of cannabis products (and as manufacturing such cannabis product).​

“(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any cannabis product which is for such person’s own personal consumption or use.​

“(3) APPLICATION OF RULES RELATED TO MANUFACTURERS OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Any reference to a manufacturer of tobacco products, or to manufacturing tobacco products, shall be treated as including a reference to a manufacturer of cannabis products, or to manufacturing cannabis products, respectively.”.​

(5) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR DETERMINING PRICE.—Section 5702(l) of such Code is amended—​

(A) by striking “section 5701(a)(2)” and inserting “subsections (a)(2) and (h) of section 5701”; and
(B) by inserting “and cannabis products” after “cigars” in the heading thereof.

(6) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5702(j) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “In the case of a cannabis product, the previous sentence shall be applied by substituting ‘from a facility of a manufacturer required to file a bond under section 5711’ for ‘from the factory or from internal revenue bond under section 5704’.”.​

(c) Effective date.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the amendments made by this section shall apply to articles manufactured or imported in calendar quarters beginning more than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.​

(2) TRUST FUND.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 5. Opportunity trust fund programs.​

(a) Cannabis Justice Office; community reinvestment grant program.—
(1) CANNABIS JUSTICE OFFICE.—Part A of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 109 the following:
“SEC. 110. Cannabis justice office.​

“(a) Establishment.—There is established within the Office of Justice Programs a Cannabis Justice Office.​

“(b) Director.—The Cannabis Justice Office shall be headed by a Director who shall be appointed by the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs. The Director shall report to the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs. The Director shall award grants and may enter into compacts, cooperative agreements, and contracts on behalf of the Cannabis Justice Office. The Director may not engage in any employment other than that of serving as the Director, nor may the Director hold any office in, or act in any capacity for, any organization, agency, or institution with which the Office makes any contract or other arrangement.​

“(c) Employees.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall employ as many full-time employees as are needed to carry out the duties and functions of the Cannabis Justice Office under subsection (d). Such employees shall be exclusively assigned to the Cannabis Justice Office.​

“(2) INITIAL HIRES.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Director shall—​

“(A) hire no less than one-third of the total number of employees of the Cannabis Justice Office; and
“(B) no more than one-half of the employees assigned to the Cannabis Justice Office by term appointment that may after 2 years be converted to career appointment.

“(3) LEGAL COUNSEL.—At least one employee hired for the Cannabis Justice Office shall serve as legal counsel to the Director and shall provide counsel to the Cannabis Justice Office.​

“(d) Duties and Functions.—The Cannabis Justice Office is authorized to—
“(1) administer the Community Reinvestment Grant Program; and​

“(2) perform such other functions as the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs may delegate, that are consistent with the statutory obligations of this section.”.​

(2) COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM.—Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
​

“PART OO

—​

Community Reinvestment Grant Program​

“SEC. 3052. Authorization.​

“(a) In general.—The Director of the Cannabis Justice Office shall establish and carry out a grant program, known as the ‘Community Reinvestment Grant Program’, to provide eligible entities with funds to administer services for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, including—
“(1) job training;​

“(2) reentry services;​

“(3) legal aid for civil and criminal cases, including expungement of cannabis convictions;​

“(4) literacy programs;​

“(5) youth recreation or mentoring programs; and​

“(6) health education programs.​

“(b) Substance use treatment services.—The Community Reinvestment Grant Program established in subsection (a) shall provide eligible entities with funds to administer substance use treatment services for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs.
“SEC. 3053. Funding from opportunity trust fund.

“The Director shall carry out the program under this part using funds made available under section 9512(c)(1) and (2) of the Internal Revenue Code.​

“SEC. 3054. Definitions.

“In this part:​

“(1) The term ‘cannabis conviction’ means a conviction, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency, for a cannabis offense (as such term is defined in section 12(2) of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019).​

“(2) The term ‘substance use treatment’ means an evidence-based, professionally directed, deliberate, and planned regimen including evaluation, observation, medical monitoring, harm reduction, and rehabilitative services and interventions such as pharmacotherapy, mental health services, and individual and group counseling, on an inpatient or outpatient basis, to help patients with substance use disorder reach remission and maintain recovery.​

“(3) The term ‘eligible entity’ means a nonprofit organization, as defined in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, that is representative of a community or a significant segment of a community with experience in providing relevant services to individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs in that community.​

“(4) The term ‘individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs’ has the meaning given that term in section 5 of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019”..”.​

(b) Cannabis opportunity program; equitable licensing grant program.—
(1) CANNABIS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall establish and carry out a program, to be known as the “Cannabis Opportunity Program” to provide any eligible State or locality funds to make loans under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 363(m)) to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)) that operate in the cannabis industry.​

(2) EQUITABLE LICENSING GRANT PROGRAM.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall establish and carry out a grant program, to be known as the “Equitable Licensing Grant Program”, to provide any eligible State of locality funds to develop and implement equitable cannabis licensing programs that minimize barriers to cannabis licensing and employment for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, provided that each grantee includes in its cannabis licensing program at least four of the following:​

(A) A waiver of cannabis license application fees for individuals who have had an income below 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Level for at least 5 of the past 10 years who are first-time applicants.
(B) A prohibition on the denial of a cannabis license based on a conviction for a cannabis offense that took place prior to State legalization of cannabis or the date of enactment of this Act, as appropriate.
(C) A prohibition on criminal conviction restrictions for licensing except with respect to a conviction related to owning and operating a business.
(D) A prohibition on cannabis license holders engaging in suspicionless cannabis drug testing of their prospective or current employees, except with respect to drug testing for safety-sensitive positions, as defined under the Omnibus Transportation Testing Act of 1991.
(E) The establishment of a cannabis licensing board that is reflective of the racial, ethnic, economic, and gender composition of the State or locality, to serve as an oversight body of the equitable licensing program.

(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:​

(A) The term “individual most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs” means an individual—
(i) who has had an income below 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Level for at least 5 of the past 10 years; and
(ii) has been arrested for or convicted of the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis or a controlled substance (except for a conviction involving distribution to a minor), or whose parent, sibling, spouse, or child has been arrested for or convicted of such an offense.
(B) The term “eligible State or locality” means a State or locality that has taken steps to—
(i) create an automatic process, at no cost to the individual, for the expungement, destruction, or sealing of criminal records for cannabis offenses; and
(ii) eliminate violations or other penalties for persons under parole, probation, pre-trial, or other State or local criminal supervision for a cannabis offense.
(C) The term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, and any Indian Tribe (as defined in section 201 of Public Law 90–294 (25 U.S.C. 1301) (commonly known as the “Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968”)).

SEC. 6. Availability of Small Business Administration programs and services to cannabis-related legitimate businesses and service providers.​

(a) Definitions relating to cannabis-Related legitimate businesses and service providers.—Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(ff) Cannabis-Related legitimate businesses and service providers.—In this Act:
“(1) CANNABIS.—The term ‘cannabis’—​

“(A) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and
“(B) does not include—
“(i) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
“(ii) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.

“(2) CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESS.—The term ‘cannabis-related legitimate business’ means a manufacturer, producer, or any person or company that is a small business concern and that—​

“(A) engages in any activity described in subparagraph (B) pursuant to a law established by a State or a political subdivision of a State, as determined by such State or political sub-division; and
“(B) participates in any business or organized activity that involves handling cannabis or cannabis products, including cultivating, producing, manufacturing, selling, transporting, displaying, dispensing, distributing, or purchasing cannabis or cannabis products.

“(3) SERVICE PROVIDER.—The term ‘service provider’—​

“(A) means a business, organization, or other person that—
“(i) sells goods or services to a cannabis-related legitimate business; or
“(ii) provides any business services, including the sale or lease of real or any other property, legal or other licensed services, or any other ancillary service, relating to cannabis; and
“(B) does not include a business, organization, or other person that participates in any business or organized activity that involves handling cannabis or cannabis products, including cultivating, producing, manufacturing, selling, transporting, displaying, dispensing, distributing, or purchasing cannabis or cannabis products.”.

(b) Small business development centers.—Section 21(c) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(9) SERVICES FOR CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—A small business development center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(c) Women’s business centers.—Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(p) Services for cannabis-Related legitimate businesses and service providers.—A women’s business center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(d) SCORE.—Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(b)(1)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The head of the SCORE program established under this subparagraph may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(e) Veteran Business Outreach Centers.—Section 32 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657b) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(h) Services for cannabis-Related legitimate businesses and service providers.—A Veteran Business Outreach Center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(f) 7(a) loans.—Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(36) LOANS TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—The Administrator may not decline to provide a guarantee for a loan under this subsection to an otherwise eligible small business concern solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(g) Disaster loans.—Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:

“(16) ASSISTANCE TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—The Administrator may not decline to provide assistance under this subsection to an otherwise eligible borrower solely because such borrower is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(h) Microloans.—Section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(14) ASSISTANCE TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—An eligible intermediary may not decline to provide assistance under this subsection to an otherwise eligible borrower solely because such borrower is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.​

(i) State or local development company loans.—Title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 511. Loans to cannabis-related legitimate businesses and service providers.

“The Administrator may not decline to provide a guarantee for a loan under this title to an otherwise eligible State or local development company solely because such State or local development company provides financing to an entity that is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider (as defined in section 3(ff) of the Small Business Act).”.​

SEC. 7. No discrimination in the provision of a federal public benefit on the basis of cannabis.​

(a) In general.—No person may be denied any Federal public benefit (as such term is defined in section 401(c) of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1611(c))) on the basis of any use or possession of cannabis, or on the basis of a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a cannabis offense, by that person.​

(b) Security clearances.—Federal agencies may not use past or present cannabis or marijuana use as criteria for granting, denying, or rescinding a security clearance.
SEC. 8. No adverse effect for purposes of the immigration laws.​

(a) In general.—For purposes of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act), cannabis may not be considered a controlled substance, and an alien may not be denied any benefit or protection under the immigration laws based on any event, including conduct, a finding, an admission, addiction or abuse, an arrest, a juvenile adjudication, or a conviction, relating to cannabis, regardless of whether the event occurred before, on, or after the effective date of this Act.​

(b) Cannabis defined.—The term “cannabis”—
(1) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and​

(2) does not include—​

(A) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
(B) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.

(c) Conforming amendments to immigration and nationality act.—The Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 212(h), by striking “and subparagraph (A)(i)(II) of such subsection insofar as it relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;​

(2) in section 237(a)(2)(B)(i), by striking “other than a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;​

(3) in section 101(f)(3), by striking “(except as such paragraph relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana)”;​

(4) in section 244(c)(2)(A)(iii)(II) by striking “except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;​

(5) in section 245(h)(2)(B) by striking “(except for so much of such paragraph as related to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana)”;​

(6) in section 210(c)(2)(B)(ii)(III) by striking “, except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana”; and​

(7) in section 245A(d)(2)(B)(ii)(II) by striking “, except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana”.
SEC. 9. Resentencing and expungement.​

(a) Expungement of Federal cannabis offense convictions for individuals not under a criminal justice sentence.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Federal district shall conduct a comprehensive review and issue an order expunging each conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense entered by each Federal court in the district before the date of enactment of this Act and on or after May 1, 1971. Each Federal court shall also issue an order expunging any arrests associated with each expunged conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency.​

(2) NOTIFICATION.—To the extent practicable, each Federal district shall notify each individual whose arrest, conviction, or adjudication of delinquency has been expunged pursuant to this subsection that their arrest, conviction, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency has been expunged, and the effect of such expungement.​

(3) RIGHT TO PETITION COURT FOR EXPUNGEMENT.—At any point after the date of enactment of this Act, any individual with a prior conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense, who is not under a criminal justice sentence, may file a motion for expungement. If the expungement of such a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency is required pursuant to this Act, the court shall expunge the conviction or adjudication, and any associated arrests. If the individual is indigent, counsel shall be appointed to represent the individual in any proceedings under this subsection.​

(4) SEALED RECORD.—The court shall seal all records related to a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency that has been expunged under this subsection. Such records may only be made available by further order of the court.​

(b) Sentencing review for individuals under a criminal justice sentence.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—For any individual who is under a criminal justice sentence for a Federal cannabis offense, the court that imposed the sentence shall, on motion of the individual, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the attorney for the Government, or the court, conduct a sentencing review hearing. If the individual is indigent, counsel shall be appointed to represent the individual in any sentencing review proceedings under this subsection.​

(2) POTENTIAL REDUCED RESENTENCING.—After a sentencing hearing under paragraph (1), a court shall—​

(A) expunge each conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense entered by the court before the date of enactment of this Act, and any associated arrest;
(B) vacate the existing sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency and, if applicable, impose any remaining sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency on the individual as if this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, were in effect at the time the offense was committed; and
(C) order that all records related to a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency that has been expunged or a sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency that has been vacated under this Act be sealed and only be made available by further order of the court.

(c) Effect of expungement.—An individual who has had an arrest, a conviction, or juvenile delinquency adjudication expunged under this section—
(1) may treat the arrest, conviction, or adjudication as if it never occurred; and​

(2) shall be immune from any civil or criminal penalties related to perjury, false swearing, or false statements, for a failure to disclose such arrest, conviction, or adjudication.​

(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Federal cannabis offense” means an offense that is no longer punishable pursuant to this Act or the amendments made under this Act.​

(2) The term “expunge” means, with respect to an arrest, a conviction, or a juvenile delinquency adjudication, the removal of the record of such arrest, conviction, or adjudication from each official index or public record.​

(3) The term “under a criminal justice sentence” means, with respect to an individual, that the individual is serving a term of probation, parole, supervised release, imprisonment, official detention, pre-release custody, or work release, pursuant to a sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency imposed on or after the effective date of the Controlled Substances Act (May 1, 1971).
SEC. 10. References in existing law to marijuana or marihuana.

Wherever, in the statutes of the United States or in the rulings, regulations, or interpretations of various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States—​

(1) there appears or may appear the term “marihuana” or “marijuana”, that term shall be struck and the term “cannabis” shall be inserted; and​

(2) there appears or may appear the term “Marihuana” or “Marijuana”, that term shall be struck and the term “Cannabis” shall be inserted.
SEC. 11. Severability.

If any provision of this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of this Act and the amendments made by this Act to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.​

SEC. 12. Cannabis offense defined.

For purposes of this Act, the term “cannabis offense” means a criminal offense related to cannabis—​

(1) that, under Federal law, is no longer punishable pursuant to this Act or the amendments made under this Act; or​

(2) that, under State law, is no longer an offense or that was designated a lesser offense or for which the penalty was reduced under State law pursuant to or following the adoption of a State law authorizing the sale or use of cannabis.
SEC. 13. Rulemaking.

Unless otherwise provided in this Act, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Small Business Administration shall issue or amend any rules, standard operating procedures, and other legal or policy guidance necessary to carry out implementation of this Act. After the 1-year period, any publicly issued sub-regulatory guidance, including any compliance guides, manuals, advisories and notices, may not be issued without 60-day notice to appropriate congressional committees. Notice shall include a description and justification for additional guidance.​

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/video-swal...tation-on-americans-denies-farting-on-camera/


VIDEO: Swalwell, Who Threatened to Unleash Nuclear Devastation on Americans, Denies Farting on Camera

A loud, possibly gaseous noise was heard on the hot mic

Tom Pappert | National File - November 19, 2019 46 Comments

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1196605744881078272







Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) appeared to loudly break wind while he was on live television, being interviewed on MSNBC.
Swalwell was being interviewed by MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on the topic of impeachment when he began to make what seem to be strained facial expressions.

Seconds later Swalwell appeared to lurch forward slightly, and a loud, possibly gaseous noise was heard on the hot mic, prompting conservatives on Twitter to begin using the hashtag “#FartGate” in an attempt to solve the noxious mystery.
Swalwell vehemently denied the allegation that more hot air escaped his person than intended during the interview in a statement sent to Buzzfeed, leading some viewers to logically assume that he is shifting blame to Matthews, the only other person on camera with a microphone that could have picked up the ghastly noise.
Despite his denials, Twitter users and citizen researchers deftly navigated the wind currents surrounding #FartGate and apparently, using infrared filters, discovered a large, warm presence escaping Swalwell’s derriere.

National File was unable to verify the authenticity of the infrared footage, but gleefully awaits any possible flatulence fact checkers who may be able to find the source the stench emanating from the MSNBC broadcast.
Fresh off his failed presidential run, Swalwell is no stranger to controversy, having threatened a different type of warfare against gun owning Americans in 2018.
While arguing for mandatory gun confiscation with Joe Biggs, now a host at Gavin McInnes’ Free Speech TV, Swalwell chose nuclear war as opposed to gas attacks.
In response to a tweet by Biggs, now banned from Twitter for reasons unrelated to flatulence, Swalwell responded that any potential civil war over gun confiscation “would be a short war” as “the government has nukes.”

It is unknown if Swalwell would also employ chemical warfare on unsuspecting, gun toting Americans.
At press time, President Donald Trump has yet to chime in via Twitter regarding #FartGate, leaving Americans to wait in suspense on the proverbial porcelain throne.
From Sept 11th, 2017, Alex Jones and Roger Stone break down the reports that President Trump is slowly being poisoned, isolated and controlled by his Deep State handlers with the help of General Kelley and General McMaster.

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/just-so-yo...-of-roger-stone-with-that-of-jeffrey-epstein/


Just So You Know The Rules In This Country’: Tucker Contrasts Treatment Of Roger Stone With That Of Jeffrey Epstein

“The authorities don’t like Roger Stone. He did something worse than molesting children. He mocked the people in charge.”

Daily Caller - November 19, 2019 28 Comments





Fox News host Tucker Carlson contrasted the public arrest and harsh treatment of longtime Trump associate Roger Stone with the treatment received by deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start">&#65279;</span>
After an early morning January military-style arrest involving armed federal agents that was tipped to CNN, Stone was convicted on Friday of one count each of obstructing an official proceeding and witness tampering, along with five counts of making false statements to the House Intelligence Committee.
“Stone’s main crime was lying to Congress about who he had or had not spoken to about Russia,” Carlson opined. “By the time Stone’s trial began in Washington, the larger scandal that ensnared him had long been debunked.”

​

Still, Carlson noted, prosecutors “argued that Roger Stone should spend up to 50 years in prison, effectively the rest of his life,” while “official Washington cheered.”

From Sept 11th 2017, Alex Jones and Roger Stone break down the reports that President Trump is slowly being poisoned, isolated and controlled by his deep state handlers with the help of General Kelley and General McMaster.
By the way, upgrade your smile with the new SuperSilver Whitening Toothpaste that’s on sale now!
“‘Rot in hell,’ they screamed on Twitter, oblivious to karma, which by the way is real,” said Tucker, referring in part to “The View” co-host Meghan McCain’s post-Stone-conviction remarks.
All of which, Carlson contended, was “much harsher and more outraged … than anything that greeted convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein.”
“How was he arrested?” asked the Fox News host. “That’s a trick question. He wasn’t arrested. According to the New York Times account, prosecutors called Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and politely asked him to turn himself in, which Epstein politely did. Nobody tipped off CNN.”
Carlson went on to describe Epstein’s treatment and initial plea deal, where he received only 18 months in prison and was allowed to serve it in a “private wing of the Palm Beach County Stockade.” Epstein was even able to leave for work release even though convicted child molesters aren’t “allowed to get work release.”
“Authorities gave it to Epstein anyway, apparently they liked him,” said Carlson. “The authorities don’t like Roger Stone. He did something worse than molesting children. He mocked the people in charge, and then helped get Donald Trump elected president. For that Roger Stone is likely to die in prison. Just so you know the rules in this country.”

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/white-hous...xpected-hospital-visit-to-test-for-poisoning/


White House Source: Trump Made Unexpected Hospital Visit to Test For Intentional Poisoning

Food tester was first rushed to hospital, and doctors believe there was exposure to time-delayed poison

Infowars.com - November 18, 2019 238 Comments
Image Credits: Drew Angerer/Getty Images, Screenshot ( Drew Angerer/Getty Images).





An inside source says President Trump’s food taster became ill after ingesting an unnamed substance, which is why the president made a surprise hospital visit on Saturday.
In an official statement, the White House said President Trump visited the Walter Reed Military Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, for a “quick exam and labs.”

The hospital visit was not listed on the president’s public schedule, according to media outlets which indicated that the visit was not a routine physical exam.
Additionally, the inside source said his food taster was rushed to the facility after becoming extremely ill.

​

Doctors and staff reportedly found the byproduct of a type of toxin that’s very hard to detect and has a time-delayed onset of symptoms.
Additionally, the toxin is a newer concoction that’s not typically tested for since it’s not well-known, according to the source.
The president was later taken to the same facility where a battery of tests were performed to assess whether he had ingested the same toxin.
There’s an ongoing investigation into the matter.
During the Clinton administration, the chief chef was designated the “presidential food taster,” according to the former White House chef Walter Scheib.
According to the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard:
“He said, ‘Yeah, the chef is the taster. We are the last ones to taste it before it goes out,'” [writer Adrian] Miller said of his talk with Scheib.
What’s more, he said, the White House has an elaborate system to keep food for the first family and even state dinners safe. Primarily, the kitchen works with companies that have undergone background checks.
“Discretion is valued,” he said. “If you find somebody bragging about that, you shouldn’t trust them,” said Miller.
Interestingly, Scheib also said that sometimes the most secure way to serve food to the president is to “just go to the store and shop at the last moment.”
That might explain Trump’s ongoing penchant for fast food.
And, according to a 2013 article by Business Insider:
It’s very likely the President has a food taster, and despite criticism of the practice under President Barack Obama, the mystery anti-poison position apparently goes back to the days of Ronald Reagan.
The recent taster controversy was sparked after a report of the President not eating at a lunch with Republican senators earlier this month.
“Apparently he has to have essentially a taster, and I pointed out to him that we were all tasters for him, that if the food had been poisoned all of us would have keeled over,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told the Daily Mail after the lunch. “He did look longingly at it and he remarked that we have far better food than the Democrats do, and I said that was because I was hosting.”
White House sources have confided to Alex Jones that there’s been other poisoning attempts against the president in the past. We’re going to break down this live on air while also analyzing other components of the Deep State coup.
Despite the fact that this news broke over the weekend, there’s hardly any coverage regarding the fact that the president made a very rare, unexpected visit to a medical center.
Historically, time-delayed poisons were popular with assassins due to their ability to get past food tasters and other chemical tests that are done on food before it’s eaten.
Powerful leaders were routinely drugged or poisoned throughout the ages.

The president isn’t showing any outward signs of being sick, but he was put though a battery of tests as a precaution.
Additionally, investigators are also considering whether the secret service agent who died while travelling with President Trump in July 2018 was poisoned, according to a source.
In the early stages of Trump’s presidency, Infowars reported that the president may have been drugged which led to a slowdown of his speech.
The president was also sabotaged in various other ways, including the removal of documents and news articles from his desk and the outright blocking of his directives from being carried out.
Attorney General William Barr has also said the executive branch is being sabotaged from doing its basic functions.
This bureaucratic resistance against the president is all part of the climate of division and “civil war” occurring in the country – and it’s par for the course historically when someone is trying to be removed from power – and poisoning is the logical next step given historic trends.

 

[armedoldhippy]

Science is a series of questions and tests based on observations, not fabrication. Religion is fabricated out of a need or desire for control of other people. These fabrications are based on perceived gullibility related to explanations of the unknown.

imho religion is based on ancient mans desire to understand that which he cannot know. still going on today, but with many of those "tending the flocks" being of lesser quality morals that the job calls for. "opiate of the masses" LOL! i have always looked at "organized religion" with the same jaundiced eye i use on "organized crime"... if everyone knew for positive that there was no heaven or hell, nor punishment awaiting an evil life, how would the vast majority of people react?

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/scientists-destroying-cancerous-cells-from-within-using-trojan-horses/


Scientists Destroying Cancerous Cells From Within Using “Trojan Horses”

Tiny catalyst developed to travel inside tumorous cell

University of Granada | EurekAlert! - November 19, 2019 Comments
Image Credits: Dan Kitwood / Staff / Getty.





Using “Trojan horses” to combat cancer from within the tumour cells themselves without damaging healthy tissues is the aim of this new tool created by researchers from the University of Granada (UGR), the Institute of Nanoscience of Aragon (INA), the University of Zaragoza, and the Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre at the University of Edinburgh.
The researchers have used exosomes as “Trojan horses” to deliver palladium (Pd) catalysts into cancer cells. “We introduce the catalyst into tiny vesicles or exosomes the size of about 100 nanometres, which are capable of traveling right inside the tumorous cell. Once there, they catalyse a reaction that transforms a passive molecule into a potent anticancer agent,” explains Professor Jesús Santamaría of the University of Zaragoza, who, along with Doctor Asier Unciti-Broceta of the University of Edinburgh, has led this study published by the prestigious scientific journal Nature Catalysis.
Participating in the research, entitled “Cancer-derived exosomes loaded with ultrathin palladium nanosheets for targeted bioorthogonal catalysis”, are Belén Rubio Ruiz of the UGR, María Sancho, Víctor Sebastián, and Manuel Arruebo of the University of Zaragoza, and Pilar Martín-Duque of the Aragonese Foundation for Research & Development (ARAID), an agency created by the Government of Aragon within the INA. The work has been carried out in collaboration with the research group of the University of Edinburgh, led by Dr Asier Unciti-Broceta.

​

Killing a cancer cell is straightforward: there are many toxic molecules that can perform the task. The challenge is to target the toxic molecule at the cancer cell only, and not at healthy cells. This lack of selectivity in directing anticancer drugs is the cause of the often devastating side effects that cancer patients experience during chemotherapy treatment. Rather than injecting such drugs into the bloodstream, it would be much better if they could be manufactured directly inside the cancer cells. And that is precisely what this international team of scientists has achieved.
“We use catalysts in many aspects of everyday life because they generate chemical reactions that would not otherwise be possible. For example, the gases emitted by our cars pass through a catalyst to make them less harmful to the environment and our health,” comments Belén Rubio Ruiz. It is therefore surprising that catalysis, which is known to be so useful in so many fields, is practically unheard-of in oncology. “This is due to the fact that there are tremendous obstacles: identifying suitable catalysts and reactions and, above all, delivering the catalysts directly into the target cells, and not others.”
Unlimited Health or Unlimited Govt? Using your own stem cells can cure far more than just baldness. Arthritis, immune disease, multiple sclerosis, and autism are just a few Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know about.
The key: Exosomes
However, exosomes may prove to be the key. Exosomes are secreted by most cells and are surrounded by a membrane containing elements that are characteristic of the cell from which they originate. This renders them selective (thanks to the phenomenon of tropism toward the cells of origin), and makes it possible for them to carry a therapeutic load preferentially to the original cell, even in the presence of other cells.
The authors of the study have found a way to induce the synthesis of catalysts (Pd nanosheets with a thickness of just over one nanometre) inside tumour cell exosomes without disturbing the properties of their membranes–thus converting the exosomes into “Trojan horses” capable of delivering the catalyst to the progenitor cancer cells. Once there, they catalyse the in situ synthesis of an anticancer compound (panobinostat, an anticancer drug approved in 2015).
Having demonstrated the effectiveness of this process in their study, the researchers observe: “We collected exosomes of the same type of cancerous cell that was to be treated, we loaded them with the palladium catalyst and returned them to the culture medium. There, thanks to their selective tropism, the exosomes deliver the catalyst to the original cell. Once inside, the catalyst converts the inactive panobinostat into its active and toxic form, thus killing off the tumour cell just where we want: right inside the tumour cell.”
The key to the process is selectivity of the transport mechanism mediated by exosomes. Thanks to this selectivity, panobinostat is only generated within the cells that the catalyst has reached, and hence it preferentially causes the death of the original tumour cells, while the mortality rate among other cells is much lower.
Nick Fuentes Talks Groyper Wars And The Coming Fall Of TPUSA Nick Fuentes joins Alex Jones & Owen to talk about the battle brewing between Republicans and conservatives over American values.

 

[TychoMonolyth]

https://www.infowars.com/white-hous...xpected-hospital-visit-to-test-for-poisoning/


White House Source: Trump Made Unexpected Hospital Visit to Test For Intentional Poisoning

...[snip]...

God damn I hope it's true.

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/report-fbi...clinton-raped-him-at-age-8-in-satanic-ritual/


Report: FBI Interviews Victim Alleging Bill Clinton Raped Him At Age 8 In Satanic Ritual

Graphic account describes sexual and physical assault of minors by D.C. elite

Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - November 19, 2019 2 Comments





Child sex trafficking investigators, who are part of the task force looking into Jeffrey Epstein and his associates on behalf of the FBI’s New York field office and NYPD, have allegedly interviewed a man who claims former President Bill Clinton raped him when he was 8-years-old.
According to True Pundit, an FBI source said, “We are treating him as a victim,” before conducting the examination.
Despite Jeffrey Epstein’s suspicious death, the FBI task force established to investigate him remains active, with an FBI official telling True Pundit, “We still have a job to do here and that’s what we’re doing.”

​

The True Pundit’s anonymous author, who goes under the pseudonym Thomas Paine, claims to have escorted the victim to FBI Headquarters in Manhattan where the interview took place.
Describing the lead-up to escorting the victim to FBI headquarters, Paine explained, “I originally interviewed the victim with journalist Jen Moore who provided the details against Bill Clinton and other elite politicians to child trafficking specialists in DHS Department of Homeland Security and the FBI in July 2018.”
Continuing, the author said, “But Moore and the traumatized victim wanted to contact Homeland Security and the FBI first to see if they would open a criminal case against Clinton prior to publicizing the claims.”
Then, four weeks after Moore contacted the Feds, she was found dead in her D.C. hotel room after allegedly suffering a seizure.
Clearly, the timing of Moore’s death was suspicious and it also caused the victim to become even more fearful for his life than he already was, ultimately persuading him to not go public with the filmed interview.
Now, over a year after Moore’s death and following his sit-down with the FBI, the victim has given his blessing on the release of the True Pundit interview from 2018.
Warning: The following interview contains graphic details explaining the molestation and physical abuse of underage individuals.
The victim described being prostituted by his great-uncle while on a yacht in New England when he was eight-years-old.
The boy, now 27-years-old, claims to have been molested by three separate adult men during that one yacht trip.
Having been molested from age three on, the victim said he “just didn’t question where he was,” when going to unfamiliar places such as the yacht.
The victim’s great-uncle would allegedly take money from men before they entered the room and engaged in sexual activities with the young boy while the uncle stood watch outside the door.
When asked about Bill Clinton’s involvement, the victim explained that before he was raped by Clinton, “There was an incredibly violent display going on.”
“I don’t wanna talk too much about that right now,” he added.
However, the victim did go on to explain how he was held up by his great-uncle and had the bottom of his feet slashed by an accomplice who then collected the blood in a chalice and drank from it before walking back into a crowd of people watching.
Next, the victim’s uncle supposedly singled Bill Clinton out of the crowd and the former president shrugged as if to say, “What am I gonna do? I have to do it.”
The man conducting the interview asked the victim if any other children were on-board the yacht and he said he saw two other kids his age.
“I remember there being a young girl on one of the four pedestals… There might have been, I think there was a teenage girl on one of them,” he detailed.
The victim provided a comprehensive account describing the ritual he said he was involuntarily engaged in:

“When I was taken into the ballroom, these people were marched diagonally through the room from one entrance up the other to get to the top of the boat and they were all bleeding from their feet and they had cuts from their chest to their abdomen. When I was finally brought out to the top of the boat they were all already on the ground being forced to continue having sex… So, there are the people who are part of the display, the victims, and there are four pedestals with women of different stages of sexual development on them and on the middle pedestals was Bill Clinton. I don’t remember looking up, but I have found a picture of a boat that looks exactly like this one, and in this picture, this boat has a section above the top deck which is also closed off like this one was.”
​

The yacht incident was not the victim’s only exposure to this type of behavior as he claims to have been subjected to molestation over the course of his whole life.
He says to have been used “as a prop for child pornography,” and also details one “incredibly bizarre” instance where he was used as a prop in a blackmail operation.
He recounts two men taking him to an apartment belonging to a couple he describes as “professional people,” maybe lawyers or accountants, who were in bed when one of the victim’s handlers put the child into the bed and told the couple to have sex with him.
“When they started to comply, they were told ‘Oh no, don’t have sex together, have sex with the child in your bed,'” he testified.
Before being taken out of the couple’s bed, the victim’s handler showed them a device in their closet that “looks like an intercom” and said he was recording them.
The handler then told the child that in the future “computers” would be used to spy on people for blackmail purposes.
Prior to leaving the couple’s apartment, the handler is said to have walked into the bathroom, picked up a tile off the floor and removed a vile of blood from underneath.
Holding the vile for the couple to see, he said, “You’re gonna be involved in a criminal case pretty soon.”
Next, the victim described how his first memory of being molested was when his biological father allowed someone to rape him in exchange for “a large amount of cocaine.”
The interview ended when the victim supposedly became so nauseous that he began vomiting into a wastebasket.
Lending credibility to True Pundit’s supposed FBI sources and the allegation that the author accompanied the victim on his trip to the FBI’s Manhattan HQ is the outlet’s coverage of an FBI agent’s suicide in July of 2019.
Before any other news outlet, True Pundit’s FBI sources confirmed the death of supervisory special agent Salvatore “Sal” Cincinelli.
While this testimony is intriguing, it is now up to the FBI to follow up on the claims being made and to find out if there is any truth to the startling accusations.
The Black Friday sales have arrived early! Get up to 70% off our hottest products as well as free-shipping and double Patriot Points while the sale lasts!

 

[h.h.]

Accordingly, a religious person is devout in the sense that he has no doubt of the significance and loftiness of those superpersonal objects and goals which neither require nor are capable of rational foundation. They exist with the same necessity and matter-of-factness as he himself. In this sense religion is the age-old endeavor of mankind to become clearly and completely conscious of these values and goals and constantly to strengthen and extend their effect. If one conceives of religion and science according to these definitions then a conflict between them appears impossible. For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts. According to this interpretation the well-known conflicts between religion and science in the past must all be ascribed to a misapprehension of the situation which has been described.[34]

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/watch-gop-senator-says-he-doesnt-believe-epstein-killed-himself/


Watch: GOP Senator Says He Doesn’t Believe Epstein Killed Himself

‘Christmas ornaments, drywall, and Epstein — name three things that don’t hang themselves,’ Kennedy says

Infowars.com - November 19, 2019 3 Comments





Louisiana Senator John Kennedy gave a hilarious take on Jeffrey Epstein’s suspicious death while expressing doubt that the billionaire pedophile killed himself.
During a Tuesday hearing with Federal Bureau of Prisons director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Kennedy said the American people “deserve some answers” on Epstein’s supposed suicidal hanging from his Manhattan prison cell.
“Christmas ornaments, drywall, and [Jeffrey] Epstein. Name three things that don’t hang themselves,” Kennedy said. “That’s what the American people think, and they deserve some answers.”

“I know that you’re not in charge of these investigations, but you talk to the people who are. And I need you to take a very respectful message today.”

​

“Tell the American people what happened. And don’t rush it so that they don’t do a thorough investigation,” Kennedy continued.
“But you and I both know they can make this a top priority and get this done more quickly than they normally would. They need to do that. And I’d like you to deliver that message.”
During the hearing, Sawyer admitted the FBI was looking into the involvement of a “criminal enterprise” related to the circumstances of Epstein’s death.

Alex Jones interviews James O’Keefe on the new ABC revelations that are going to drop over the Epstein story coverup.

 

[pipeline]

Accordingly, a religious person is devout in the sense that he has no doubt of the significance and loftiness of those superpersonal objects and goals which neither require nor are capable of rational foundation. They exist with the same necessity and matter-of-factness as he himself. In this sense religion is the age-old endeavor of mankind to become clearly and completely conscious of these values and goals and constantly to strengthen and extend their effect. If one conceives of religion and science according to these definitions then a conflict between them appears impossible. For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts. According to this interpretation the well-known conflicts between religion and science in the past must all be ascribed to a misapprehension of the situation which has been described.[34]

Please start another thread to continue the discussion about rebelling against God.