:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::

[pipeline]

https://banned.video/watch?id=5dfcf86b8f797a00250d9a8f



Democratic Debate Wages War On Americans

17,230 views
·
Dec 20, 2019


Bowne Report





The monotony and exhaustive burnout vomiting from the left reared its ugly head yet again to debate its proposed American Dream killing legislation. But no one can deny that this group of imposters, backing Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler's recent impeachment embarrassment that could change the course of the Republic for the worse, will never be able to communicate the true message to the American voter like Donald Trump.

 

[pipeline]

https://banned.video/watch?id=5dfce4250b50080016152b1a


Crisis Engineering: How the media establishment controls real people with false narratives

2,373 views
·
Dec 20, 2019















Mike Adams


For the latest from Mike Adams, visit NaturalNews.com

 

[pipeline]

https://banned.video/watch?id=5dfd5f9e64d5070029e195b3


The Three Things You Need To Survive The UN Occupation Of America

9,055 views
·
Dec 20, 2019















Mike Adams


Mike Adams breaks down the 3 things you would need to survive a potential reality where the U.N. orders an occupation in America.

 

[xavier7995]

Well shit, can you just tell us the three lifesaving tips to survive the un-apocalypse. Like executive summary style. Do I have to buy stuff? Help your fellow man pipeline. Otherwise I'm just gonna buy a shitload of twinkies and become a barter town baron.

 

[pipeline]

https://collapse.news/2019-12-19-ju...alties-online-hate-speech-canada-tyranny.html


Justin Trudeau pushing for “significant penalties” for online “hate speech” in Canada – speech police will be on patrol to throw you in jail


12/19/2019 / By Ethan Huff

Mr. “Blackface” himself – Canada’s version, anyway – has come out in condemnation of online free speech, declaring that it’s time to start imposing “significant penalties” on social media companies that refuse to remove all “hate speech” within 24 hours.
We’re talking about Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, of course, who has yet to find a social justice cause so outlandish as to be unworthy of his public endorsement. And when it comes to making the entire internet a virtual “safe space” for liberals, or else be shut down or taken over by the government, Trudeau is fully onboard.
Trudeau reportedly told his country’s Minister of Heritage to write a mandate letter ordering Canadian legislators to draw up a bill, or series of bills, outlining his plans to crack down on internet free speech. In it, “hate speech” is specifically named as needing special attention.
“Create new regulations for social media platforms, starting with a requirement that all platforms remove illegal content, including hate speech, within 24 hours or face significant penalties,” the letter reads.
“This should include other online harms such as radicalization, incitement to violence, exploitation of children, or creation or distribution of terrorist propaganda.”
In a separate letter sent to David Lametti, Canada’s Minister of Justice, Trudeau ordered that he work together with his colleagues to combat “online hate,” which would seem to go even a step further beyond just “hate speech.”

“Work with the Minister of Diversity and Inclusion and Youth and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness to combat online hate and harassment,” this other letter reads.
In Nazi Germany 2.0, tech companies can be fined upwards of 50 million euros for failing to promptly remove “hate speech”

Trudeau is taking a page from Nazi Germany 2.0, meaning modern-day Germany where fascist policies such as the ones he’s now proposing for Canada are already in place. Believe it or not, tech companies in Deutschland can be fined up to 50 million euros for failing to promptly remove so-called “hate speech” from their platforms.
France is considering a similar but even more extreme proposal that would involve jailing tech executives deemed complicit in allowing “hateful” content to persist on their respective platforms.
Many of these nations, including Canada, have signed on to a collective demand entitled, “Christchurch Call to Action” that urges social media companies to do more to crack down on “extremism.” The United States, however, has thankfully refused to join up over concerns that the demand violates the First Amendment to the Constitution – which it does!
It remains unclear whether or not Trudeau’s blackface photos, should they be posted on social media in Canada, will qualify as “hate speech” under the proposed new laws.
Ironically, this relentless attack on free speech by Trudeau and other leftists is quintessential fascism, the very thing that these leftists claim to be against. But because they’re the ones doing it and not conservatives, they’re calling it “progressivism,” though we’re certainly not fooled by it.
“Leftists are always the natural-born fascists,” wrote one Breitbart News commenter. “They can only have total control when they have total control of everyone’s speech, and they are always trying to seize it.”
“Liberal definition of hate: For a person(s) to hold a conservative viewpoint or one that is not politically correct or liberal in nature,” wrote another.
For more related news about Big Tech censorship and the government push to continue expanding it in the name of fighting “hate,” be sure to check out Censorship.news.
There’s also now a free speech alternative to YouTube known as Brighteon.com that will never comply with egregious government demands like the one Trudeau is trying to impose because in the United States, at least, our free speech is non-negotiable.
Sources for this article include:
Breitbart.com
NaturalNews.com

 

[pipeline]

Well shit, can you just tell us the three lifesaving tips to survive the un-apocalypse. Like executive summary style. Do I have to buy stuff? Help your fellow man pipeline. Otherwise I'm just gonna buy a shitload of twinkies and become a barter town baron.

You will need at least 3 rifles, long term storable food, and water purification. Pray without ceasing. Merry Christmas!

 

[h.h.]

Well shit, can you just tell us the three lifesaving tips to survive the un-apocalypse. Like executive summary style. Do I have to buy stuff? Help your fellow man pipeline. Otherwise I'm just gonna buy a shitload of twinkies and become a barter town baron.

Guns: Good til you run out of powder.

Gold. You’re fucking kidding me.

Stale twinkies: just no.

I got nothing.

 

[buzzmobile]

Breaking new information about Jeffry Epstein and those involved in the criminal pedophile child trafficking activity being released on INFOWARS today.



Stay tuned!



Justice will be served!

I stay tuned. Nothing happened. What's up with that?

 

[audiohi]

Did anyone ever see that show about preppers and how long they'd last in a dire scenario? Shit was hilarious. I mean, the show was awful, but the people...

Everyone believed they were prepped ready for the apocalypse, and in the final reveal they were always like "You would survive 3 days."

An emergency stock is great to have. Anyone who believes it's anything more than that, probably isn't going to make it anyway.

 

[Capra ibex]

Did anyone ever see that show about preppers and how long they'd last in a dire scenario? Shit was hilarious. I mean, the show was awful, but the people...

Everyone believed they were prepped ready for the apocalypse, and in the final reveal they were always like "You would survive 3 days."

An emergency stock is great to have. Anyone who believes it's anything more than that, probably isn't going to make it anyway.

The only show i can vaguely remember about 'preppers' had a guy with bodybuilder-esque physique, veins popping, muscles bulging, tattoos all over, wearing camouflage and a massive stock of weapons.... all kinds of booby traps and pop up targets etc. etc.

Telling how things would go down when the sh*t hits the fan.... all you could hear were birds chirping

I imagine his wife was either just like him or looking out her window shaking her head and facepalming, thinking how the hell am i going to get away from this guy??

 

[xavier7995]

I am torn on who the best prepper was. There was the guy that shot himself in the thumb, but there were also the people that cruised around on fat carts from walmart.

Anywho...gonna go with bullets as being more important than having more than one gun. It's just a big stick/club if you have no ammo.

I need to learn how to use and build a still. My barter town will be rife with drugs and booze. Viva the apocalypse.

 

[h.h.]

Stockpiling Sudafed.

 

[beta]

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

Well - at least he's honest - but already I think many others have come to that conclusion -

 

[pipeline]

The documentary was being produced Monday and was going to be released late Mon or early Today. Sorry for the delay.


Justice will be served.


Merry Christmas

Here is part of the series of releases to be coming out in the near future.


Epstein affiliated airplane rides with child sex trafficking is still going on.


https://www.infowars.com/epstein-network-still-up-operational-recruiting-young-girls/



https://banned.video/watch?id=5e0195e1d8d7ec002764b20a


Epstein Network Still Up & Operational, Recruiting Young Girls

Shock video shows young ‘stewardesses’ advertising to elite clients

Infowars.com - December 24, 2019 26 Comments





In an in-depth, extremely important interview, Alex Jones and a guest investigator break down undeniable evidence that individuals directly linked to the late Jeffrey Epstein – ones associated with him for many, many years – are linked to businesses promoted by – and offering contact with – young, solicitous models dressed in stewardess and pilot costumes.

This information has been hiding in plain view this entire time, but the mainstream media has largely been hesitant to cover the story and its salaciousness, choosing instead to focus simply on Epstein who’s conveniently dead.
Shock video shows young girls dressed as stewardesses being used in the elite world of private executive jet travel to entice men to join their club. Please share this video!
Case in point, one of Epstein’s former associates owns and runs an aviation marketing company called Aviloop which was promoted by young “deal attendants” – wearing costumes instead of uniforms – explaining the services offered to elite clients of executive jet travel.
“We offer deals on flight lessons, pilot accessories, fuel, FBO [fixed-based operator] services, charter flights and even small aircraft,” says one young model in an solicitous ad uploaded to YouTube on Aug. 5, 2011. “Our deals are usually 50 to 90% off, that means whether you want to learn to fly, charter an airplane or see more girls like me, Aviloop can help.”

Here’s one of Aviloop’s “Deal Attendants” in a 2011 ad posted to YouTube.

 

[pipeline]

Well - at least he's honest - but already I think many others have come to that conclusion -

The information is there to find. It not about the retard Alex Jones. He is a goofball, but he's authentic. Thats how normal, un-tainted humans act in America. Alex mimics Americana culture, its just how we are out in the country.


Infowars has become so successful because the news and information is presented in talk-radio/television format which is easy to digest and keeps you interested. Also the journalists and guests discuss facts and topics which are not allowed on the mainstream media. Even FOX news is controlled establishment propaganda, although they do allow some truth to make its way through to make people think they are getting the entire story.


Do you understand what I'm saying?

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/many-couples-arguing-more-about-trump-than-finances/


Many Couples Arguing More About Trump Than Finances

Political strife tearing relationships apart

Dora Mekouar | Voice of America - December 24, 2019 12 Comments
Image Credits: Witthaya Prasongsin / Getty.





Her husband’s steady shift to the political right during their 24-year marriage was a source of frustration and embarrassment for liberal Jennifer Merrill, but it wasn’t until the election of Donald Trump — and her husband’s support for the president — that she’d finally had enough.
Merrill moved out and filed for divorce.
“I just couldn’t see sharing a bed with somebody that agreed with what Trump was doing when I was so against everything that Trump represented,” says Merrill, a book editor for a trade association, and the mother of three children. “He had no sensitivity for how I felt, that I felt so strongly about it, especially when I was going out and doing protests … and he would just laugh about it and continue to defend [Trump]. So that just made me very, very angry.”

​

Merrill is among 11% of Americans who have ended a serious relationship due to political differences, according to a 2017 poll. One in 5 Americans say they know a couple whose marriage or relationship has been negatively affected by President Trump’s election.
Ezra Levant joins Alex Jones to discuss the motive behind propagating ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ throughout the American populace and the global population.
“Among Americans in a committed relationship who voted differently in 2016 than their significant other, 41% say they and their partner disagree or argue about politics more than ever,” says Nathan Richter of Wakefield Research, a self-described nonpartisan firm that conducted the study.
Various polls show the country is deeply divided when it comes to President Trump and whether he should have been impeached. The study results suggest there is a very real human toll to the divisiveness and rancor that has gripped the nation since the president’s election.
Virginia attorney Anita Jo Shifflett, who voted for Trump, says she and her husband, Douglas Williams, a committed Democrat, argue over politics pretty much every time they watch the news together. The couple married in 2015.
“He was aware that I was a Trump supporter, that I voted for Trump, and I was aware he was a Democrat to the core when we were dating, so it’s kind of something we just knew about each other and accepted. It hasn’t really been a big issue for us,” Shifflett says.
But that doesn’t mean their political differences don’t cause friction.
“He likes to bash Trump. You know, he likes to call him names and all that stuff,” Shifflett says. “He’s really angry about it. When he criticizes Trump I feel like I’ve heard it before. Again and again, and I heard it the first time. You don’t need to keep repeating it to me.”
Shifflett’s experience isn’t unique, according to Wakefield’s research, which finds that 1 in 5 couples now argue more about Trump than they do about money. Finances are traditionally the biggest cause of strife in a relationship.
“To see that is superseded by disagreements over views on President Trump is very notable,” says Richter of Wakefield Research. “That’s a way to sort of put this trend in context, to show just how passionate that 21 percent is on that issue.”
The so-called Trump effect seems to hit millennials the hardest. The Wakefield study found that 22% of people in their 20s and 30s report breaking up with someone over political differences. That’s double the rate of the general population. And almost 1 in 3 millennials say they know a couple whose marriage has been negatively affected by President Trump’s election.

Francesco Carta fotografo / Getty Images J.D. Dobson was a Republican staffer working on Capitol Hill when he met his future wife, Katie Dobson, a Democrat. The St. Louis, Missouri, couple used to argue over gun control. After 11 years of marriage and two children, J.D. says his political views have shifted somewhat. Although he still considers himself a conservative, he is not a supporter of President Trump.
“I think our general outlook on the world was pretty similar even though our partisan affiliation was different,” J.D. says. “But I will tell you with certainty that if I woke up tomorrow and decided that I was pro-Trump, it would threaten our marriage.”
“The kids would be in the car,” Kate says with a laugh. “I mean, should I leave a note or would you know what it was?”
Merrill, the woman who left her husband after Trump’s election, maintains a good relationship with her ex — as long as they don’t discuss politics, religion or gun control. Merrill says there were other issues in her marriage. She’d had a growing sense that she and her partner of 24 years weren’t particularly compatible.
But would she still be married if Donald Trump hadn’t been elected president?
“If Hillary [Clinton] had won, maybe we would still be married. Maybe we’d still be together,” Merrill says. “That’s hard to say because we did have other problems, and I feel like Trump was just the last piece that made me go. So if he wasn’t president, maybe I would still be there, but I’m not 100% sure.”

 

[pipeline]

https://www.infowars.com/jeffrey-ep...mossad-says-ex-biz-partner-steven-hoffenberg/


Jeffrey Epstein ‘Admitted To Me’ He Was A Spy For The Mossad, Says Ex-Biz Partner Steven Hoffenberg

Hoffenberg claims was afraid to mention the espionage angle because he felt “the espionage connections were too hot

Chris Menahan | Information Liberation - December 24, 2019 4 Comments





Jeffrey Epstein “admitted” he was “a top-level agent for the Israeli Mossad” to his fellow now-disgraced business partner Steven Hoffenberg, Dylan Howard reports.
From Dylan Howard:

EPSTEIN ‘ADMITTED TO ME’ HE WAS A SPY: Ex-Business Partner Of Sex Criminal Claims Prince Andrew Is Protecting Ghislaine Maxwell, Stonewalling Prosecutors’ Investigation Over Blackmail Fears

​

Steven Hoffenberg was arrested by FBI agents in Arkansas in 1996, after regulators accused him of defrauding investors.
The former business partner of Jeffrey Epstein in Towers Financial spent 18 years in jail for the largest Ponzi schemes in history prior to Bernie Madoff’s crimes.
But the notorious sex criminal got away scot-free.
Why? In a series of new and exclusives conversations, Hoffenberg reveals the real reason he evaded justice in one of America’s largest Ponzi schemes—he was an international spy.
by Dylan Howard
Britain’s Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged pimp Ghislaine Maxwell have joined forces to stonewall investigators and prevent Epstein’s victims from obtaining justice.
That’s the explosive claim of former Epstein colleague and friend, Steven Hoffenberg, who confirms that Epstein was indeed a top-level agent for the Israeli Mossad, as first confirmed in the best-selling book Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales.
In a series of bombshell interviews with me following the release of the book, Hoffenberg confirmed that not only does he have first-hand knowledge of Epstein’s work as an agent of the Mossad, as described in the book; but also, his former cohorts Prince Andrew and Maxwell are still actively working to keep his explosive secrets.
Hoffenberg famously worked as Epstein’s business partner at the ill-fated Towers Financial Group in the 1990s.
In 1993, the business collapsed as a multi-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme was exposed. Hoffenberg pleaded guilty and went to prison in 1995, but Epstein got off scot-free.
Steven Hoffenberg is the former chairman of Towers Financial Corporation, a debt collection agency, that he used in a Ponzi scheme.
He was the owner of the New York Post. The firm collapsed in 1993, and in 1995 Hoffenberg pleaded guilty to bilking investors out of $475 million.
The SEC considered his financial crimes as “one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history” prior to Bernie Madoff’s crimes a decade later. According to Hoffenberg, it was his espionage connections that helped him skate.
During his work with Epstein, Hoffenberg says, he had a front-row seat to the espionage work that brought Epstein into close contact with foreign agents from Saudi Arabia, Israel, Russia and more.
​

Shock videos show young girls dressed as stewardesses being used to lure other young women into the elite world of private executive jet travel while enticing men to join their club. Independent investigator reveals connections between former Epstein sex slave turned pilot who was given immunity and Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s property managing brother.

Read Hoffenberg’s full statement. Hoffenberg claims was afraid to mention the espionage angle because he felt “the espionage connections were too hot, and that concerned me for risk — up until your book.”
I don’t know whether Hoffenberg is actually telling the truth but the evidence we already have unquestionably points to Epstein having been an agent of the Mossad (despite Alan Dershowitz’s claims to the contrary).
Hoffenberg, who is said to be around 72 years old now, claims he became a Christian while in prison.
He was also part of a now-withdrawn lawsuit filed in 2018 by former Tower investors which alleged that Epstein was an “uncharged co-conspirator” in his Ponzi scheme.
The lawsuit also alleged “that the millions in stolen investment was the seed capital for Epstein’s hedge fund, which it values at $50 billion,” QZ.com reported.
Ed Opperman interviewed Hoffenberg on the case on Friday:
Epstein went to work for pro-Israel billionaire Les Wexner after Hoffenberg was taken down.
As to Epstein being handled with kid gloves by our government, The Daily Mail reported earlier this year that Epstein worked as an FBI informant to secure his sweetheart plea deal when he was facing life in prison back in 2007. The probe was closed out in 2008. The FBI, which at the time was under director Robert Mueller, allegedly let Epstein off the hook in part because he turned over some info on two Bear Sterns execs — who were later both acquitted!
He ended up only having to serve 13 months.
Then-US attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alex Acosta — who crafted the plea deal — in 2016 told the Trump transition team when asked about his handling of Epstein’s case that “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.”

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

infowars just doesn't seem to be popular so much on this forum pipeline - can be interesting no doubt - but not really so popular - as a news-source - around these parts - usually looked at as being distinctly sensationalistic and gratuitously so - to the point of it being unbearable - so disbelieved -

Whether any of the stories hold water or not - you would probably have to do your own research to be absolutely sure - and not take infowars word for it -

 

[pipeline]

35,000 views on this thread, but ok-- thats what I'm talking about. Do research on the information "leads" they provide to determine the truth for yourself.



How else do you explain the millions of views, and support from well known constitutional conservatives like Ron Paul and President Trump?


Infowars is on a mission to bring the truth to light for the citizens of America and the world. Maintaining a pro-liberty and pro-freedom news organization provides information needed for citizen activists to help our society become better. Becoming clear now?