ILIKETOLEARN
Member
Is there a "how to" on trimming the back side of plants in a stadium set up?
World Peace,
ILL
World Peace,
ILL
I ran my room sealed w/ co2 last summer with 3k(air cooled horizontal)temps were in the mid 80's most of the time(thermostat was set to 82 so i could have gotten it even cooler) however i think that if the room wasn't sealed i could have had the temps down a bit without running the a/c and dehuey $$$ but the co2 increased the yield and also added approx another $100 a month to my elec bill(A/C & dehuey) although the added cost was more than made up for by the increase in yield it was a pita trying to control humidity and i live in the desert....also the dehuey made the room even hotter it's a total catch 22 I'm not sure im willing to put my quality on the line for an increased yield. I opened it up for winter and it's very easy for me to seal it back up and give it some boost but I'm really just curious on whether or not I would be able to cool 3k in bare bulbs, I know I could make it happen with cool tubes but i just dont know if it will make the efficiency of the vert setup go down to the point where the benefits are unseen.Whadeezlrg, I was/am dealing with same probs... i have 2 bare 1k's in a room with a 12k btu a/c... when i was venting out I was getting okay temps, 80 with lights off/90 on... for teh hell of it and to see what would happen, I sealed the room in, now my temps are 85 when lights are off...not sure what they are when the lights are on...i sealed it to run co2, but i will go back to venting out...
at least until next run, when i get a better a/c..and some other modifications..
Nice thread. Never done vert, but I do have a question..
While looking at this pattern of a 4 plant grow:
xox
oxo
xox
the thought came to mind.. If you drew lines through this (like a tic tac toe board)..
x I 0 I x
--I--I--
0 I x I 0
--I--I--
x I 0 I x
and then counted the the sides of the plant on each line that was in contact with direct light the sum would be 12..
If you used this configuration:
0 I x I 0
--I--I--
x I 0 I x
--I--I--
0 I x I 0
the sum would also be 12. I am completely non-vert-savvy, but is there any reason to think the outcome would not be the same using four lights instead of five?
With the standard configuration, each plant gets the exact same 3 sides coverage of light.
With your configuration, the four outer plants recieve 2 sides of light, while the center plant has 4 sides of light. So you'll have a giant bush in the middle with 4 smaller bushes outside.
The five lamp, four tree configuration has stood the test of time. Save yourself the headache of trying to reinvent the wheel, and just focus on dialing in the specifics of your grow.