-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
ICMAG Administration endorses The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010
- Thread starter JJScorpio
- Start date
- Status
Keep asking, people will see how repetitive and pointless your arguments are. It's been answered many times already.
localhero
Member
sometimes the most vicious fights are between brothers.
not in my family. I dont trat anyone like that I guess it's just me what a would we live in
It gets rid of all the recreational users from the 215 system so medical marijuana can be taken seriously instead of people pointing at California and saying see they aren't sick they just want to get high. Which makes it incredibly more difficult for patients in non med states to pass legislation to ensure safety for those who benefit from cannabis.
And I won't have to waste any more time and money on incompetant "doctors" who can't run a real practice...
Bunt. B-U-N-T, in perfect cursive. Any more brain busters?
truth huh? Well where is the truth in your second sentence then? This Felony your talking about? Because the only felonies in 19 have to do with...and I quote..
nowhere in there does it say smoking around kids gets you a felony.
So...it say's this 'Act' does not cover smoking around minors. That's it. It doesn't say your going to get a felony or that your going to jail.
Besides that...why would anyone want to smoke around thier kids anyways? Remember were taking 'recreational' here. Let me answer...a total idiot.
but hey...Super good job on the make believe fear mongering BS though.
localhero
Member
im asking because so far no one can answer with a valid arguement.
perhaps you would like a shot at answering it? or are you afraid that you too cant come up with one?
id like to know, it would ease my mind when voting yes.
I still like you HH and I know they don't have the man power to look at everyone, but they do have the man power to squeeze the shit out of who ever they want. And I have ZERO faith that the pigs won't harass people given the opportunity.
We all know from personal experience or that of family and close friends, once the pigs come in they break everything and respect nothing. They don't do it to all of us but they do do it to ALL that they interact with.
You should vote your mind and I'm your friend either way, but I don't like this proposal because it VALIDATES the actions of the pigs. Right now they abuse us and violate our rights and we proclaim the injustice. In December when they jackboot someone and say that bad guy had WAY TOO MUCH weed or WAY TOO BIG A GARDEN they can also say and EVERYONE agrees that TOO MUCH WEED = 7 years in prison, see the recent passage of prop 19
That is why I have to say no this prop 19 advocates IMMORAL imprisonment.
I still like you HH and I know they don't have the man power to look at everyone, but they do have the man power to squeeze the shit out of who ever they want. And I have ZERO faith that the pigs won't harass people given the opportunity.
We all know from personal experience or that of family and close friends, once the pigs come in they break everything and respect nothing. They don't do it to all of us but they do do it to ALL that they interact with.
You should vote your mind and I'm your friend either way, but I don't like this proposal because it VALIDATES the actions of the pigs. Right now they abuse us and violate our rights and we proclaim the injustice. In December when they jackboot someone and say that bad guy had WAY TOO MUCH weed or WAY TOO BIG A GARDEN they can also say and EVERYONE agrees that TOO MUCH WEED = 7 years in prison, see the recent passage of prop 19
That is why I have to say no this prop 19 advocates IMMORAL imprisonment.
Q.E.D.
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission,
Proposition 18 (2010 Water Bond)
and now this... I never had faith in politics but it just feels like everything's going down the shitter lately. But someone is going to come out very rich from all this.
give and take my friend. I wish you all the best and I will be voting yes. I know you will be voting no that does not mean I feel any different about you but most on here dont show that kind of respect. I have done my research and I don't need someone telling me im a piece of shit because of they way I have chosen to vote. Im sure you have seen this behaviour. Im just not into that. Take care im out
Dude I hope you didn't read anything I wrote as calling you a piece of shit. I've just given my opinion on why I don't like this prop. and it looks like I am in the minority. As I see the name calling is directed in general at the NO's without naming anyone specifically.
An individuals vote is private and no one has the right to know which way you vote or who you vote for. Discussion over this prop shouldn't get into calling anyone a piece of shit, but the fact that there is so much disagreement is a warning sigh about this proposal.
Nothing personal,
See this is what I'm talking about. This isn't a boxing match. We aren't debating which is better. 215 and 19 are two different species.
Ask me why you are hellbent to misinterpret and trash this bill? Be real. If you think you will lose money just say so. But quit acting like you give a fuck about anyone elses safety, because all of you proved your hate is fueled by something else, as all of your arguments have no merit and are disproven faster than you can create them.
Theoretical? Why is it theoretical to think I won't need to pay these fucking fake doctors $150 for a piece of paper once it becomes legal?
Watch how fast those packed dr.s office become a ghost town with passage of 19...
localhero
Member
im taking a plant tending break. but i will be back to see if anyone has a real answer to the bolded question below.
the point is simple. why would i want to vote in something that doesnt extend freedoms? anyone can get a med card. am i abusing the medical system? BOO HOO.
im asking again, because i want to know,
what part of 19 is better than 215?
the question is so simple. i will bold it.
can anyone copy and paste the part of the wording of prop 19 that clearly outdoes 215?
i wanna know
Boo Hoo? Check out the link I've attached that was posted earlier opposing the passage of 19. When the inevitable backlash comes and 215 is reduced back to what it was originally intended, what are you going to use to skirt around the law if 19 doesn't pass? http://www.nipitinthebud2010.org/215_medical_mess.html
Localzero it's obvious there us nothing we can say to sway your vote. You already have made it clear you grow for profit. You have made it clear that you will not welcome even the slightest regulation. And you have made it clear you will misinterpret this prop to decieve voters.
You are truly a piece of shit. You have no grounds of an argument. 19 is all win. If it somehow superceded 215 I would be on your side but this is simply a false accusation made by a scared yellow bellied coward grasping at straws.
19 takes nothing away and gives us a whole he'll of a lot. It was written conservatively to intice non cannabis smokers into voting in favor of legalization or at the very least not voting against it. It was written with compromises for the opposers, but also sets laws for local counties to decide to raise the legal limit.
Let's pass this prop, than we can work on raising the limits at a local level.
I'm still waiting to hear a single valid argument to note vote yes....
You are truly a piece of shit. You have no grounds of an argument. 19 is all win. If it somehow superceded 215 I would be on your side but this is simply a false accusation made by a scared yellow bellied coward grasping at straws.
19 takes nothing away and gives us a whole he'll of a lot. It was written conservatively to intice non cannabis smokers into voting in favor of legalization or at the very least not voting against it. It was written with compromises for the opposers, but also sets laws for local counties to decide to raise the legal limit.
Let's pass this prop, than we can work on raising the limits at a local level.
I'm still waiting to hear a single valid argument to note vote yes....
he said he was changing his vote to yes pages ago after t.hill posted. I guess he changed his mind again? why even bother to say witch way you are going to vote when it's obvious you don't even know yet
- Status
